e8vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 7, 2010
Conns, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
000-50421
|
|
06-1672840 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3295 College Street
Beaumont, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
77701
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (409) 832-1696
Not applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 8.01. Other Events.
We are filing this Current Report on Form 8-K to retrospectively revise portions of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, filed on March 25, 2010 and amended
by our Form 10-K/A filed on April 12, 2010, our January 31, 2010 Form 10-K, to reflect: (1) the
retrospective application of our adoption of a new accounting principle, effective February 1,
2010, that resulted in a change in our accounting for our interest in a variable interest entity,
and (2) a change in reportable business segments creating two reportable segments.
In June 2009, the FASB issued revised authoritative guidance to improve the relevance and
comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements
about:
|
|
|
a transfer of financial assets; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows; |
|
|
|
|
a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets; and |
|
|
|
|
improvements in financial reporting by companies involved with variable interest
entities (VIE) to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial
statements by requiring an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the
enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a
VIE. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has
both of the following characteristics: |
|
a) |
|
The power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact
the entitys economic performance; and |
|
|
b) |
|
The obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be
significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could
potentially be significant to the VIE. |
As a result of the Companys adoption of the provisions of the new guidance, effective February 1,
2010, the Companys VIE, which is engaged in customer receivable financing and securitization, is
being consolidated in the Companys balance sheet and the Companys statements of operations,
stockholders equity and cash flows. Previously, the operations of the VIE were reported
off-balance sheet. The Company has elected to apply the provisions of this new guidance by
retrospectively restating prior period financial statements to give effect to the consolidation of
the VIE, presenting the balances at their carrying value as if they had always been carried on its
balance sheet.
As a result of our adoption of a new accounting principle that resulted in the consolidation of our
finance subsidiary and the changes in the financial markets and availability of capital, we have
expanded the operational reporting now being used by management to provide more detailed operating
performance information for our retail and credit operations, including modification of the
financial information reported to the chief decision maker and the board of directors. As such, we
have concluded, beginning with fiscal 2011, that it is appropriate to include additional financial
information about our retail and credit segments.
The attached exhibits contain the portions of our January 31, 2010 Form 10-K that are affected by
the retrospective application of the adoption of the abovementioned new authoritative guidance and
the resulting two reporting segments. Exhibit 99.1 reflects changes made to Item 1 Business.
Exhibit 99.2 reflects changes made to Item 6 Selected Financial Data. Exhibit 99.3 reflects
changes made to Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations. Exhibit 99.4 contains Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, which
includes the complete set of consolidated financial statements from our January 31, 2010 Form 10-K
as adjusted for the retrospective application of the new accounting principle and the addition of the reporting
segments discussed above.
The information presented in the exhibits to this Current Report on Form 8-K updates the
information set forth in our January 31, 2010 Form 10-K and the related consent of our independent
registered public accounting firm. None of the exhibits to this Current Report on Form 8-K reflect
events after the filing of our January 31, 2010 Form 10-K or modifies or updates the disclosure in
our January 31, 2010 Form 10-K other than (i) certain information in Exhibit 99.1 updates Item 1
Business to include certain data and financial information for our fiscal quarter ended April 30,
2010, and (ii) to reflect the changes related to the retrospective application of the adoption of
the new accounting principle and the additional reporting segments discussed above; thus, all other sections and
exhibits to our January 31, 2010 Form 10-K remain unchanged.
Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed with this report:
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
Description |
12.1
|
|
Statement of computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charge |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
2010 10-K, Item 1 Business |
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
Description |
99.2
|
|
2010 10-K, Item 6 Selected Financial Data |
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
2010 10-K, Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
2010 10-K, Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONNS, INC.
|
|
Date: July 7, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Michael J. Poppe
|
|
|
Name: |
Michael J. Poppe |
|
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv12w1
Exhibit 12.1
Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Income before minority interest
and income taxes |
|
$ |
8,035 |
|
|
$ |
63,642 |
|
|
$ |
64,242 |
|
|
$ |
58,234 |
|
|
$ |
61,482 |
|
Fixed charges |
|
|
34,880 |
|
|
|
37,105 |
|
|
|
36,560 |
|
|
|
32,299 |
|
|
|
26,467 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total earnings |
|
$ |
42,826 |
|
|
$ |
100,583 |
|
|
$ |
100,550 |
|
|
$ |
90,234 |
|
|
$ |
87,949 |
|
Interest expense
(including capitalized interest) |
|
$ |
20,666 |
|
|
$ |
24,072 |
|
|
$ |
25,853 |
|
|
$ |
22,505 |
|
|
$ |
17,647 |
|
Amortized premiums and expenses |
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
Estimated interest within rent expense |
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
12,011 |
|
|
|
10,209 |
|
|
|
9,286 |
|
|
|
8,363 |
|
Total fixed charges |
|
$ |
34,880 |
|
|
$ |
37,105 |
|
|
$ |
36,560 |
|
|
$ |
32,299 |
|
|
$ |
26,467 |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Conns, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charged to |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Beginning of |
|
Costs and |
|
Accounts- |
|
Deductions- |
|
End of |
Description |
|
Period |
|
Expenses |
|
Describe |
|
Describe1 |
|
Period |
|
Year ended January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves and allowances from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
17,520 |
|
|
$ |
19,465 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(18,142 |
) |
|
$ |
18,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves and allowances from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
18,843 |
|
|
$ |
27,952 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(19,814 |
) |
|
$ |
26,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves and allowances from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
26,981 |
|
|
$ |
36,843 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(27,972 |
) |
|
$ |
35,852 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. |
|
Note: The schedule has been restated to reflect the retrospective
adoption of a new accounting
principle that required
the consolidation of the Companys variable interest entity as discussed in
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. |
- 1 -
exv23w1
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1) Form S-8 No. 333-111280
(2) Form S-8 No. 333-111281
(3) Form S-8 No. 333-111282
(4) Form S-8 No. 333-111208
(5) Form S-3 No. 333-157390
of our report dated March 25, 2010, except for Notes 2 and 14 as to which the date is July 7, 2010,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Conns, Inc. for the year
ended January 31, 2010 included in the Current Report (Form 8-K),
/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
Houston, Texas
July 7, 2010
- 1 -
exv99w1
Exhibit 99.1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to we, us, and our refer to the
consolidated business operations of Conns, Inc. and all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries,
limited liability companies and limited partnerships.
Company overview
We are a leading specialty retailer of durable consumer products, and we also provide consumer
credit to support our customers purchases of the products that we offer. Currently, we derive our
revenue primarily from two sources: (i) retail sales and delivery of consumer electronics, home
appliances, furniture and mattresses, lawn and garden equipment and repair service agreements; and
(ii) our in-house consumer credit program, including sales of related credit insurance products. We
operate a highly integrated and scalable business through our 76 retail stores and our website,
providing our customers with a broad range of brand name products, in-house financing options, next
day delivery capabilities, and outstanding product repair service through well-trained and
knowledgeable sales, consumer credit and service personnel. Through our wide range of in-house
proprietary consumer credit programs, we provided financing for 60.1% of our retail sales during
the twelve months ended April 30, 2010.
We offer over 3,000 product items, or SKUs, at good-better-best price points in our core
retail product categories of:
|
|
|
Consumer Electronics, which includes LED, LCD, plasma, DLP and 3-D televisions,
camcorders, digital cameras, computers and computer accessories, Blu-ray and DVD
players, video game equipment, portable audio, MP3 players, GPS devices and home
theater products. We represent such brands as Samsung, Sony, LG, Toshiba, Hewlett
Packard, Panasonic, Mitsubishi, Compaq, Bose, Canon and JVC. As reported in This Week
in Consumer Electronics, or Twice, we were the 35th largest retailer of consumer
electronics in the United States in 2009; |
|
|
|
|
Home Appliances, which includes refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers,
dishwashers, ranges and room air conditioners. We represent such brands as Whirlpool,
Maytag, Frigidaire, Kitchen Aid, Samsung, LG, General Electric and Friedrich. As
reported by Twice, we were the 9th largest appliance retailer in the United States in
2009; |
|
|
|
|
Furniture and Mattresses, which includes living room, bedroom and dining room
furniture. We represent such brands as Serta, Lady Americana, Better Homes and Gardens,
Ashley, Lane, Broyhill, Franklin and Jackson Furniture; |
|
|
|
|
Lawn and Garden Equipment, which includes lawn mowers, lawn tractors and handheld
equipment. We represent such brands as Poulan, Husqvarna and Toro; and |
|
|
|
|
Repair service agreements, which provide product repair and replacement services for
customers who purchase such agreements. |
We offer our products through 76 retail stores located in three states: Texas (67), Louisiana
(6) and Oklahoma (3), as well as through our website. We sell our products for cash or for payment
through major credit cards, in addition to offering our customers several financing alternatives
through our proprietary credit programs and third-party financing. Under our proprietary in-house
credit program, we offer our customers a choice of installment payment plans and revolving credit
plans through our primary credit portfolio. We also offer an installment program through our
secondary credit portfolio to a limited number of customers who do not qualify for credit under our
primary credit portfolio. Additionally, the most credit worthy customers in our primary credit
portfolio may be eligible for no-interest financing plans.
We began as a small plumbing and heating business in 1890. We started selling home appliances
to the retail market in 1937 through one store located in Beaumont, Texas. In 1959 we
opened our second store and have since grown to 76 stores. We have been known for providing
excellent customer service for over 119 years. We believe that our customer-focused business
strategies make us an attractive alternative to appliance and electronics superstores, department
stores and other national, regional and local retailers. We strive to provide our customers with:
|
|
|
a broad selection of products at various price points; |
|
|
|
|
next day delivery and installation capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
a high level of customer service; |
|
|
|
|
flexible financing alternatives through our proprietary in-house credit programs and
third-party financing; |
|
|
|
|
commissioned and trained sales force; and |
|
|
|
|
outstanding product repair or replacement service. |
For over 40 years we have offered flexible consumer credit through our proprietary in-house
credit program to our credit-worthy customers for purchases of only the products we offer. We
believe our consumer credit program differentiates us from our competitors who do not offer similar
in-store consumer credit programs, and generates strong customer loyalty and repeat business for
us. We believe that our credit customers represent an underserved market that seeks to purchase the
latest in consumer goods through access to flexible consumer credit alternatives that are not
widely available to them.
We believe that these strategies drive repeat purchases and enable us to generate substantial
brand name recognition and customer loyalty. During the twelve months ended April 30, 2010,
approximately 68% of our credit customers, based on the number of invoices written, were repeat
customers, and we have a 90% customer satisfaction rate in surveys our customers voluntarily
complete.
Our decisions to extend consumer credit to our retail customers are made by our internal
credit underwriting department located at our corporate office separate and distinct from our
retail sales department. As of April 30, 2010, we employed 21 credit underwriters who make credit
granting decisions using our proprietary underwriting process. Our underwriting process considers
one or more of the following elements: credit bureau reporting; income verification; current income
and debt levels; a review of the customers previous credit history with us; the credit risk of the
particular products being purchased; and the level of the down payment made at the time of
purchase.
In addition to our underwriting personnel, as of April 30, 2010, we employed approximately 600
people in our collections department who service 100% of our consumer credit portfolio. Our
in-house credit financed sales are secured by the products purchased, which we believe gives us a
distinct advantage over other creditors when pursuing collections, especially given that many of
the products we finance are necessities for the home. We employ an intensive credit collection
strategy that includes dialer-based calls, virtual calling and messaging systems, field collectors
that contact borrowers at their home or place of employment, collection letters, a legal staff that
files lawsuits and attends bankruptcy hearings, and voluntary repossession.
By combining our front-end underwriting discipline with the back-end rigor in monitoring and
collections, we have achieved an average net loss ratio of 3.4% over the past three fiscal years.
As of April 30, 2010, our total portfolio balance was $700.5 million and the percentage of
borrowers who were more than 60 days delinquent was 8.6%. Additionally, we work with our borrowers
after they experience financial hardships in order to help them re-establish their regular payment
habits through our reaging program. As of April 30, 2010, 19.1% of the total portfolio balance had
been reaged during the term of the financing, thereby extending the total term of those customers
financing agreements. For the three
- 2 -
months ended April 30, 2010 and the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, our ratio of net
charge-offs as a percentage of our total receivables balance was 4.6% and 3.9%, respectively.
In 1994, we realigned and added to our management team, enhanced our infrastructure and
refined our operating strategy to position ourselves for future growth. From fiscal
19941 to fiscal 1999, we selectively grew our store base from 21 to 26 stores while
improving operating margins. Since fiscal 1999, we have generated significant growth in our number
of stores and revenue. Specifically:
|
|
|
we have grown from 26 stores to 76 stores, an increase of over 192%, and although we
have no new store openings currently planned, we plan to continue our store development
in the future, dependent on capital availability, to fund the expansion of consumer
financial operations; |
|
|
|
|
total revenues have grown 257%, at a compounded annual rate of 12.3%, from $245.1
million in fiscal 1999, to $875.6 million in fiscal 2010 and our same store sales
growth from fiscal 1999 through fiscal 2010 has averaged 5.7%; it decreased by 13.8%
for fiscal 2010; |
|
|
|
|
our operating margin has averaged 8.6% since fiscal 2006; it was 3.3% for fiscal
2010; and |
|
|
|
|
our consumer credit portfolio has grown 356.3%, at a compound annual growth rate of
14.8%, from $161.3 million at July 31, 1999 to $736.0 million at January 31, 2010. |
Industry overview
The products we sell are generally home necessities used by our customers in their everyday
lives.
We believe we will continue to benefit from several key industry trends and characteristics,
including:
|
|
|
introduction of new technologies driving consumers to upgrade existing appliances
and electronics (i.e. 3-D televisions, energy-efficient front-load laundry); |
|
|
|
|
increasing demand for large screen (42 inches and greater) televisions, which are
large items that cannot be easily carried out of the retail store, and therefore
typically require delivery and installation; |
|
|
|
|
rationalization of several national and regional players leading to market share
opportunities; and |
|
|
|
|
reductions in consumer lending, especially for lower tier credit score customers. |
As measured by Twice, the top 100 consumer electronics retailers in the United States reported
consumer electronic sales of $121.3 billion in 2009, a 1.8% increase from the $119.1 billion
reported in 2008. The consumer electronics market is highly fragmented with sales coming from large
appliance and electronics superstores, national chains, small regional chains, single-store
operators, and consumer electronics departments of selected department and discount stores. We
estimate, based on data provided in Twice, that Best Buy and Wal-Mart, the two largest consumer
electronics retailers, together accounted for approximately 42% of the total electronics sales
attributable to the 100 largest retailers in 2009. Based on revenue
in 2009, we were the 35th
largest retailer of consumer electronics in the United States. For the twelve months ended April
30, 2010, we generated $237.9 million, or 37.6%, of total product sales from the sale of consumer
electronics.
|
|
|
1 |
|
Effective August 1, 2001, we changed our
fiscal year end from July 31 to January 31. |
- 3 -
Technological advancements and the introduction of new products have largely driven growth in
the consumer electronics market. Recently, industry growth has been fueled primarily by the
introduction of products that incorporate digital technology, such as high definition flat-panel
(including 3-D, LCD, and LED technology) and projection televisions, Blu-ray and traditional DVD
players, digital cameras and camcorders, digital stereo receivers, satellite technology and MP3
products. Digital products offer significant advantages over their analog counterparts, including
better clarity and quality of video and audio, durability of recording and compatibility with
computers. Due to these advantages, we believe that digital technology will continue to drive
industry growth.
Based on data published in
Twice the top 100 major appliance retailers reported sales of
approximately $22.6 billion in 2009, down approximately 3.7% from reported sales in 2008 of
approximately $23.5 billion. The retail appliance market is large and concentrated among a few
major dealers, with sales coming primarily from large appliance and electronics superstores,
national chains, small regional chains and home improvement centers. Sears has been the leader in
the retail appliance market, with a market share of the top 100
retailers of approximately 32% in
2009 and 33% in 2008. Lowes and Home Depot held the second and third place positions,
respectively, in national market share in 2008. We were the 9th largest appliance
retailer in the United States in 2009. For the twelve months ended April 30, 2010, we generated
$199.3 million, or 31.5%, of total product sales from the sale of home appliances.
In the home appliance market, many factors impact sales, including consumer confidence,
economic conditions, household formations and new product introductions. Product design and
innovation have recently been a key driver of sales in this market, while the reduction in sales of
homes has negatively impacted appliance sales. Products recently introduced include high
efficiency, front-loading laundry appliances and three door refrigerators, and variations on these
products, including new features.
According to the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis, personal
consumption expenditures for household furniture were estimated to be approximately
$85.8 billion in 2009, down from $92.8 billion in the prior year.
The household furniture and mattress market is highly fragmented with sales
coming from manufacturer-owned stores, independent dealers, furniture centers, specialty sleep
product stores, national and local chains, mass market retailers, department stores and, to a
lesser extent, home improvement centers, decorator showrooms, wholesale clubs, catalog retailers,
and the Internet. For the twelve months ended April 30, 2010, retail sales of furniture and
mattresses comprised approximately 10.7% of our total product sales, and, other than accessories,
which account for less than 2% of our total product sales, generated our highest individual product
category gross margin of 32% versus our overall retail product margin of 21% for the twelve months
ended April 30, 2010. Given our ability to provide consumer financing and next day delivery, we
believe that we have significant growth opportunities in this market, and expect to continue to
expand this product line.
Based on data from the Federal Reserve System, estimated total consumer credit outstanding,
which excludes primarily loans secured by real estate, was $2.45 trillion as of December 31, 2009,
down 4.3% from $2.56 trillion at December 31, 2008. As a result of the recession that began in late
2007, consumers have increased their rate of savings and reduced their level of borrowing to fund
purchases. Consumers obtain credit from banks, credit unions, finance companies and non-financial
businesses that offer credit, including retailers. The credit obtained takes many forms, including
revolving (e.g., credit cards) or fixed-term (e.g., automobile loans) credit, and at times is
secured by the products being purchased.
- 4 -
Our competitive strengths
Distinct shopping experience.
We strive to offer our customers a distinct shopping experience through a continuing focus on
execution in five key areas: merchandising, consumer credit, distribution, product service and
training. Successful execution in each area relies on the following strategies:
|
|
|
Providing a high level of customer service. We endeavor to maintain a high level of
customer service as a key component of our culture. Our sales associates serve as
ongoing resources for our customers, including assisting with the credit application
process, scheduling delivery and installation, and acting as a point of contact for
service issues. We believe this commitment to our customers drives customer loyalty and
generates a high level of repeat purchases. Our customer service resolution department
takes more than 18,000 calls or online requests for assistance each month and attempts
to assist customers within 72 hours of contact. |
|
|
|
|
Offering a broad range of brand name products. We offer a comprehensive selection of
high-quality, brand name merchandise to our customers at guaranteed low prices.
Consistent with our good-better-best merchandising strategy, we offer a wide range of
product selections from entry-level models through high-end models. We maintain strong
relationships with the approximately 200 manufacturers and distributors that enable us
to offer over 3,000 SKUs to our customers. We carry the latest in consumer brand names
in our core product categories, including: Samsung; Sony; LG; Toshiba; Hewlett Packard;
Panasonic; Mitsubishi; Compaq; Bose; Canon; JVC; Whirlpool; Maytag; Frigidaire; Kitchen
Aid; General Electric; Friedrich; Serta; Lady Americana; Better Homes and Gardens;
Ashley; Lane; Broyhill; Franklin and Jackson Furniture. |
|
|
|
|
Employing a commissioned and trained sales force. Through a targeted sales
compensation incentive structure, regular product and sales training, and our
good-better-best merchandising strategy, our sales effort is focused on driving sales
volume towards products that both provide better value to the customer and typically
generate higher margins for our business. We require all sales personnel to complete an
intensive classroom training program and additional time riding in a delivery truck and
a service truck to observe how we serve our customers after the sale is made. After the
initial new hire training, all sales personnel participate in regular training programs
to learn about new products and refresh their knowledge of the general sales process
and maintaining a high level of customer service. Additionally, we also require all
credit personnel to complete a two week classroom training program. Classroom
instruction includes negotiation techniques and credit policy training to ensure
customer retention and compliance with debt collection regulations. Post graduation,
the collection trainees undergo additional skill set assessment training, coaching, and
call monitoring within their respective department assignments. All credit personnel
are required to complete monthly and quarterly refresher training and testing. |
|
|
|
|
Maintaining next day delivery and installation capabilities. We maintain four
regional distribution centers and two other related facilities that, in combination
with outsourced third-party distribution arrangements, cover all of the markets in
which we operate. These facilities are part of a sophisticated inventory management
system that also includes a fleet of approximately 70 transfer and delivery vehicles
that service all of our customers not serviced by our third-party providers. Our
distribution operations have enabled us to deliver products on the day after the sale
for approximately 94% of our customers who scheduled delivery during that timeframe. |
|
|
|
|
Offering outstanding product repair or replacement services. For all products that
are either covered by warranties or for customers who purchase repair service
agreements, we provide repair or replacement services. We service every product that we
sell, and we service only |
- 5 -
|
|
|
the products that we sell. In this way, we can assure our customers that they will
receive our service technicians exclusive attention to their product repair needs. We
will repair the product ourselves, make house calls if necessary or facilitate
replacement products. All of our service centers are authorized factory service
facilities that provide trained technicians to offer in-home diagnostic and repair
service utilizing a fleet of approximately 120 service vehicles as well as on-site
service and repairs for products that cannot be repaired in the customers home. At
times, we also use third-party service providers to allow us to cover some of the
markets outside our traditional service areas and maintain the appropriate level of
customer service. |
|
|
|
|
Endeavoring to maintain a high level of customer satisfaction. Our customer
satisfaction level, which is measured for the sales floor, delivery operation and
service department, averaged approximately 90% over the past three fiscal years, based
on customer surveys which typically have a response rate of approximately 17%. We
measure customer satisfaction on the sales floor, in our delivery operation and in our
service department by sending survey cards to all customers to whom we have delivered
or installed a product or made a service call. |
Proprietary in-house credit program.
Our consumer in-house credit program is an integral part of our business, and we believe it is
a major driver of customer loyalty. We have offered flexible financing alternatives to our
customers through our proprietary in-house credit programs for over 40 years. Our credit program
allows us to differentiate ourselves from our competitors who do not offer similar programs.
As of April 30, 2010, the aggregate outstanding account balances in our consumer credit
portfolio were $700.5 million, of which 40% was financed through our own capital and 60% was
financed by our borrowings. Historically, our equity investment in our credit portfolio has been
greater than 35%. We believe that our deeply rooted collections culture stems in large part from
our dedication to protecting this investment, and since a significant portion of our own capital is
at stake, we believe it is important for us to control the credit process from initial underwriting
to final collection. Thus, we do not outsource our credit operations. We believe that it is this
high level of attention, from our strict underwriting standards to our robust in-house monitoring
and collections practices, when combined with the secured nature of our portfolio, which drives the
strong long-term performance of our credit portfolio.
In the last three years, we financed, on average, approximately 61% of our retail sales
through our proprietary in-house credit programs. We believe that our credit programs provide our
customers access to financing alternatives that our competitors typically do not offer and, as a
result they:
|
|
|
expand our potential customer base, |
|
|
|
|
increase our sales revenue, |
|
|
|
|
enhance customer loyalty, and |
|
|
|
|
enhance our overall profitability through earnings from financing income. |
Our credit department makes all credit decisions internally, entirely independent of our sales
personnel. We provide special consideration to customers with good credit history with us. Before
extending credit, we consider our loss experience by product category and the customers credit
worthiness and income to debt level in determining the down payment amount and other credit terms.
This facilitates product sales while keeping our credit risk within an acceptable range, allowing
us to generate the performance of our credit portfolio despite the recent difficult economic
conditions. We provide a full range of credit products, including interest-free programs for the
highest credit quality customers and our secondary portfolio for our credit-challenged customers.
The secondary portfolio, which has generally lower average credit scores than our primary
portfolio, undergoes more intense
- 6 -
internal underwriting scrutiny to mitigate the inherently greater risk, including address and
employment verification and reference checks. Approximately 60% of our customers who have active
credit accounts with us take advantage of our in-store payment option and come to our stores each
month to make their payments, which we believe results in additional sales to these customers. We
employ a rigorous series of measures to ensure collection of our customer credit receivables
including contacting customers with past due accounts daily and attempt to work with them to
collect payments in times of financial difficulty or periods of economic downturn. Our experience
in credit underwriting and the collections process has enabled us to achieve an average net loss
ratio of 3.3% over the past three years on the credit portfolio that we manage, including customer
receivables sold to our bankruptcy-remote variable interest entity, or VIE.
Strong presence in desirable geographic region.
We believe our typical customer is a working class repeat buyer living in a mature
neighborhood who comes to our store to replace older household goods with newer items. Our stores
are often strategically located as the anchor store in a strip center, where we can improve access
to this target customer segment.
With 67 of our 76 stores in Texas, we believe we benefit from strong demographic trends.
According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Texas was the second largest state by nominal GDP in
2008. In addition, from 2000 to 2009, Texas experienced population growth of 18.8% compared to the
U.S. population growth of 9.1% over the same period. Moreover, Texas average unemployment rate
continues to trend below the national rate (8.3% in Texas
versus 9.7% nationally as of May 2010).
Long history of providing credit to an underserved customer base.
Many of our customers have a long credit history with us, providing us with valuable
information when making underwriting decisions. Our long history of providing consumer finance in
our markets and our in-depth understanding of the credit profile of our customers gives us the
ability to offer flexible financing options to an underserved market.
Flexible and scalable operating platform.
Our highly integrated retail and credit business model allows us to adapt a changing economic
environment and appropriately manage our liquidity. As recent economic conditions deteriorated, we:
|
|
|
adjusted our credit standards, thereby improving the credit quality of the additions
to our credit portfolio; as a result, we decreased the size of our credit portfolio and
debt balances and reduced the use of cash for working capital; |
|
|
|
|
reduced expenses, in addition to those expenses that are directly variable with
changes in net sales, which we believe will improve our operating leverage in the
future; and |
|
|
|
|
emphasized pricing discipline on the sales floor, while maintaining our competitive
pricing position in the marketplace, to drive an increase in our retail gross margin to
27.9% in the three months ended April 30, 2010, as compared to 25.0% for the same
period in the prior fiscal year; |
We have the ability to open up new stores with minimal capital requirements (less than $1.5
million of capital expenditure per leased store) and can easily integrate them into our existing
infrastructure. Our credit operations are in a central location and our vendor relationships
provide us access to stock the necessary inventory.
- 7 -
Experienced management team and collections personnel.
Our executive management team has spent an average of approximately 13 years with the Company.
The senior management team of our retail operations has experience in all aspects of that business
and has an average of approximately 15 years with the Company. The seven senior credit underwriters
possess an average of over 21 years of credit experience, supervise a group of 21 underwriters and
oversee the credit underwriting process. This level of experience ensures that both our retail and
credit operations are closely monitored.
Our strategies
Our strategies to maximize and grow returns for our stakeholders by offering customers quality
products, excellent customer service and flexible consumer credit options, include:
Be the
leading specialty retailer of consumer electronics, appliances and furniture and mattresses
in our geographic footprint.
We seek to drive improved store productivity through comparable store sales growth, expansion
of retail gross margin and increased operational efficiencies. We expect to grow sales by expanding
existing categories, especially furniture and mattresses, which we expanded in our stores over the
past five years, through improved merchandising, by reviewing and adjusting our product and brand
offerings to meet customer demand, and by a continued focus on customer service. Specifically, we
plan to increase our same store sales by:
|
|
|
adding new merchandise to our existing product lines; |
|
|
|
|
re-merchandising our product offerings in response to changes in consumer interest
and demand; |
|
|
|
|
increasing sales of our merchandise, finance products, repair service agreements and
credit insurance through direct mail and in-store credit promotion programs; |
|
|
|
|
continuing to offer quality products at competitive prices; |
|
|
|
|
continuing to provide a high level of customer service in sales, delivery and
servicing of our products; |
|
|
|
|
training our sales personnel to increase sales closing rates; and |
|
|
|
|
updating our stores as needed. |
Maintain strong credit portfolio performance.
During fiscal 2010, we re-assessed the underlying delinquency and charge-off performance of
our credit portfolio in light of the deterioration of the economy and tightened our underwriting
standards in response. The implementation of stricter underwriting standards is also a reflection
of our assessment of the profitability of our credit operation relative to the capital requirements
of that business. Our adjusted approach to underwriting credit with enhanced data verification
requirements sequentially improved our portfolio credit metrics in the first quarter of fiscal 2011
compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. Cash collections have improved since the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010 with 60-day delinquencies down 140 basis points and re-aged receivables down
50 basis points since the end of fiscal 2010, compared to a decline of 40 basis points and an
increase of 10 basis points, respectively, in the first quarter of the prior fiscal year. Our net
portfolio charge-offs (as a percent of average outstanding receivables) have averaged 3.4% over the
last three fiscal years, using a weighted average, although our net charge-offs have increased from
3.2% for the year ended January 31, 2009 to 3.9% for the year ended January 31, 2010, as a result
of challenging economic conditions. Though net charge-offs increased from 3.0% for the quarter
ended April 30, 2009, to 4.6% for the quarter ended April 30, 2010, the total amounts charged off
- 8 -
decreased $0.6 million and as a percent, from 4.8%, compared to the quarter ended January 31,
2010, despite the reduction in the outstanding balance of the portfolio. We believe that the key
drivers of our strong portfolio performance are:
|
|
|
a significant portion of our credit portfolio is financed with our capital; we
control all aspects of the credit process and do not sell our receivables to third
parties; |
|
|
|
|
we service 100% of our portfolio in-house; |
|
|
|
|
our loans to our customers are secured by the items purchased; |
|
|
|
|
customized front-end underwriting procedures tailored to our customer base,
including customer and product risk assessment and down payment determination; |
|
|
|
|
credit history of our large pool of repeat customers; |
|
|
|
|
rigorous collection process; |
|
|
|
|
64% of our loans are covered by credit insurance which covers borrowers in certain
events, and |
|
|
|
|
64% of the products securing our loans are covered by repair service agreements. |
Controlled growth of our store base and credit offerings.
As a result of the recent volatility in the capital markets we modified our store opening
plans, and currently have no new store openings planned. However, in the future we intend to
reinitiate our new store development program and increase our market presence by opening new stores
in our existing markets and in adjacent markets as we identify the need and opportunity, in each
case, dependent upon future capital availability. New store openings in these locations will allow
us to leverage our existing advertising presence, brand name recognition, reputation and
infrastructure. This infrastructure includes our proprietary management information systems,
training processes, distribution network, merchandising capabilities, supplier relationships,
product service capabilities and centralized credit approval and collection management processes.
We have historically grown our new store count by about 10% per year, except as appropriate or
necessary to take advantage of unique market opportunities, and expect to return to this modest,
controlled pace based on capital availability to support the resultant growth in our credit
operations. As we increase our capital base, we intend to increase the amount of credit
originations to our underserved customer base, to help them purchase products and services they may
not be able to purchase otherwise.
We intend to expand our store base in existing, adjacent and new markets, as follows:
|
|
|
Existing and adjacent markets. Over the long-term, we intend to increase our market
presence by opening new stores in our existing markets and in adjacent markets as we
identify the need and opportunity. New store openings in these locations will allow us
to maximize opportunity in those markets and leverage our existing distribution
network, advertising presence, brand name recognition and reputation. In fiscal 2010,
we opened one new store in each of Dallas and Houston. |
|
|
|
|
New markets. During fiscal 2008 we opened our first store in Oklahoma and opened
two additional stores in the market during fiscal 2009. We intend to consider new
markets over the next several fiscal years, beginning with markets in states in which
we currently operate. We expect that new store growth will include major metropolitan
markets in Texas and have also identified a number of smaller markets within Texas,
Louisiana and Oklahoma in which we expect to explore new store opportunities. Our
long-term growth plans include markets in other areas of significant population density
in neighboring states. |
The addition of new stores and new and expanded product categories have played a significant
role in our continued growth and success. We currently operate 76 retail stores located in Texas,
- 9 -
Louisiana and Oklahoma. We opened seven stores in each of fiscal 2008 and 2009 and two stores
in fiscal 2010. Additionally, we closed two of our clearance center locations in fiscal 2010. We
believe that continuing our strategies of updating existing stores, growing our store base and
locating our stores in desirable geographic markets is important to our future success.
Customers
We do not have a significant concentration of sales with any individual customer and,
therefore, the loss of any one customer would not have a material impact on our business. No
single customer accounts for more than 10% of our total revenues; in fact, no single customer
accounted for more than $250,000 during the year ended January 31, 2010.
Products and merchandising
Product categories.
Each of our stores sells the major categories of products shown below. The following table,
which has been adjusted from previous filings to ensure comparability, presents a summary of total
revenues for the years ended January 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Consumer electronics |
|
$ |
244,872 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
$ |
305,056 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
$ |
262,751 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
Home appliances |
|
|
223,877 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
221,474 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
208,470 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Track |
|
|
101,289 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
109,799 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
97,463 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Furniture and mattresses |
|
|
62,797 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
68,869 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
68,208 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
38,736 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
38,531 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
30,509 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product sales |
|
|
671,571 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
743,729 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
667,401 |
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
Repair service agreement commissions |
|
|
36,424 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
40,199 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
33,272 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
22,115 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
730,992 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
805,049 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
722,788 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
139,538 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
154,492 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
152,797 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
870,530 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
959,541 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
875,585 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within these major product categories (excluding repair service agreements, service
revenues and delivery and installation), we offer our customers over 3,000 SKUs in a wide range of
price points. Most of these products are manufactured by brand name companies, including General
Electric, Whirlpool, Frigidaire, Friedrich, Maytag, LG, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba, Bose,
Canon, JVC, Serta, Simmons, Spring Air, Ashley, Lane, Broyhill, Franklin, Hewlett Packard, Compaq,
Poulan, Husqvarna and Toro. As part of our good-better-best merchandising strategy, our customers
are able to choose from products ranging from low-end to mid- to high-end models in each of our key
product categories, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
Products |
|
Selected Brands |
Home appliances
|
|
Refrigerators,
freezers, washers,
dryers, ranges,
dishwashers, builtins,
air conditioners and
vacuum cleaners
|
|
Whirlpool, Maytag,
Frigidaire, Kitchen
Aid, Samsung, LG,
General Electric,
Friedrich, Roper,
Hoover, Dyson and
Eureka |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer electronics
|
|
3D, LCD, plasma, and
DLP televisions, and
home theater systems
|
|
Samsung, Sony, LG,
Toshiba, Panasonic,
Mitsubishi and Bose |
|
|
|
|
|
Track
|
|
Computers, computer
peripherals,
|
|
Hewlett Packard,
Compaq, Sony, |
- 10 -
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
Products |
|
Selected Brands |
|
|
camcorders, digital
cameras, DVD players,
audio components,
compact disc players,
GPS devices, video game
equipment, speakers and
portable electronics
(e.g. MP3 players)
|
|
Canon, Garmin,
Panasonic,
Nintendo, Microsoft
and JVC |
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and mattresses
|
|
Furniture and mattresses
|
|
Serta, Lady
Americana, Better
Homes and Gardens,
Ashley, Lane,
Broyhill, Franklin
and Jackson
Furniture |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Lawn and garden
|
|
Poulan, Husqvarna,
Toro, Weedeater |
Purchasing.
We purchase products from over 200 manufacturers and distributors. Our agreements with these
manufacturers and distributors typically cover a one-year time period, are renewable at the option
of the parties and are terminable upon 30 days written notice by either party. Similar to other
specialty retailers, we purchase a significant portion of our total inventory from a limited number
of vendors. During fiscal 2010, 58.3% of our total inventory purchases were from six vendors,
including 12.6%, 10.7% and 10.2% of our total inventory purchases from Samsung, LG and Toshiba,
respectively. The loss of any one or more of these key vendors or our failure to establish and
maintain relationships with these and other vendors could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition. We have no indication that any of our suppliers
will discontinue selling us merchandise. We have not experienced significant difficulty in
maintaining adequate sources of merchandise, and we generally expect that adequate sources of
merchandise will continue to exist for the types of products we sell.
Merchandising strategy.
We focus on providing a comprehensive selection of high-quality merchandise to appeal to a
broad range of potential customers. Consistent with our good-better-best merchandising strategy, we
offer a wide range of product selections from entry-level models through high-end models. We
primarily sell brand name warranted merchandise. Our established relationships with major appliance
and electronic vendors and our affiliation with NATM, a major buying group with $5 billion in
purchases annually, give us purchasing power that allows us to offer custom-featured appliances and
electronics at prices which compare favorably with national retailers and provides us a competitive
selling advantage over other independent retailers. As part of our merchandising strategy, we
operate two clearance centers with one in Houston and one in Dallas to help sell damaged, used or
discontinued merchandise.
Pricing.
We emphasize competitive pricing on all of our products and maintain a low price guarantee
that is valid in all markets for 10 to 30 days after the sale, depending on the product. At our
stores, to print an invoice that contains pricing other than the price maintained within our
computer system, sales personnel must call a special hotline number at the corporate office for
approval. Personnel staffing this hotline number are familiar with competitor pricing and are
authorized to make price adjustments to fulfill our low price guarantee when a customer presents
acceptable proof of the competitors lower price. This centralized function allows us to maintain
control of pricing and gross margins, and to store and retrieve pricing data of our competitors.
Store operations
Stores.
We currently operate 76 retail and clearance stores located in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma.
We recently closed our clearance center in San Antonio, Texas, to provide additional space for the
expansion of our credit collection center, which was located in the same facility, and closed and
sold our
- 11 -
clearance center in Baytown, Texas. The following table illustrates our markets, the number of
freestanding and strip mall stores in each market and the calendar year in which we opened our
first store in each market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Stores |
|
First Store |
Market |
|
Stand Alone |
|
Strip Mall |
|
Opened |
Houston |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1983 |
|
San Antonio/Austin |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1994 |
|
Golden Triangle (Beaumont,
Port Arthur, Lufkin and
Orange, Texas and Lake
Charles, Louisiana) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1937 |
|
Baton Rouge/Lafayette |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1975 |
|
Corpus Christi |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
South Texas |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our stores have an average selling space of approximately 22,000 square feet, plus a rear
storage area averaging approximately 5,500 square feet for fast-moving or smaller products that
customers prefer to carry out rather than wait for in-home delivery. Two of our stores are
clearance centers for discontinued product models, damaged merchandise, returns and repossessed
product located in our Houston and Dallas markets and contain 30,630 square feet of combined
selling space. All stores are open from 10:00 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, from 9:00
a.m. to 9:30 p.m. on Saturday, and from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Sunday. We also offer extended
store hours during the holiday selling season.
Approximately 80% our stores are located in strip shopping centers and regional malls, with
the balance being stand-alone buildings in power centers of big box consumer retail stores. All
of our locations have parking available immediately adjacent to the stores front entrance. Our
storefronts have a distinctive front that guides the customer to the entrance of the store. Inside
the store, a large colorful tile track separates the interior floor of the store for our track
products. One track leads the customer to major appliances, while the other track leads the
customer to a large display of television and home theater products. The inside of the track
contains various home office and consumer electronic products such as computers, laptops, printers,
Blu-ray and DVD players, camcorders, digital cameras, MP3 players, video game equipment and GPS
devices. We are expanding the rear floor areas of our stores for the display of furniture,
mattresses, and lawn and garden equipment. To reach the cashiers desk at the center of the track
area, our customers must walk past our products. We believe this increases sales to customers who
have purchased products from us on credit in the past and who return to our stores to make their
monthly credit payments.
We have updated many of our stores in the last three fiscal years. We expect to continue to
update our stores as needed to address each stores specific needs. We continue to update our
prototype store model and implement it at new locations and in existing locations in which the
market demands support the required design changes. As we continue to add new stores or update or
replace existing stores, we intend to modify our floor plan to include elements of this new model.
All of our updated stores, as well as our new stores, include modern interior selling spaces
featuring attractive signage and display areas specifically designed for each major product type.
Our prototype store for future expansion has from 20,000 to 25,000 square feet of retail selling
space, which approximates the average size of our existing stores and a rear storage area of
between 5,000 and 7,000 square feet. Our investment to update our stores has averaged approximately
$168,025 per store over the past three years, and we expect these improvements to benefit sales at
those stores over time. Over the last three years, we have invested approximately $10.4 million
updating, refurbishing or relocating our existing stores. We
- 12 -
continuously evaluate our existing and potential sites to position our stores in desirable
locations and relocate stores that are not properly positioned. We typically lease rather than
purchase our stores to retain the flexibility of managing our financial commitment to a location if
we later decide that the store is performing below our standards or the market would be better
served by a relocation. After updating, expanding or relocating a store, we expect to increase same
store sales at the store.
Site selection.
Our stores are typically located adjacent to freeways or major travel arteries and in the
vicinity of major retail shopping areas. We prefer to locate our stores in areas where our
prominent storefront will be the anchor of the shopping center or readily visible from major
thoroughfares. We also prefer to locate our stores in mature working class neighborhoods. We have
typically entered major metropolitan markets where we can potentially support at least 10 to 12
stores. We believe this number of stores allows us to optimize advertising and distribution costs.
We have and may continue to elect to experiment with opening lower numbers of new stores in smaller
communities where customer demand for products and services outweighs any extra cost, including our
initial move to the Oklahoma City market. Other factors we consider when evaluating potential
markets include the distance from our distribution centers, our existing store locations and store
locations of our competitors and population, demographics and growth potential of the market.
Store economics.
We lease 72 of our 76 current store locations, with an average monthly rent of $20,900. Our
average per store investment for the 14 new leased stores we have opened in the last three years
was approximately $1.4 million, including leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment and
inventory (net of accounts payable). Our total investment for the owned location that was built in
2008 totaled approximately $4.6 million, including land, buildings, fixtures and equipment and
inventory (net of accounts payable). For these new stores, excluding the clearance center opened in
San Antonio and subsequently closed to expand our call center in that location, the net sales per
store have averaged $0.5 million per month.
Our new stores have typically been profitable on an operating basis within their first three
to six months of operation and, on average, have returned our net cash investment in 20 months or
less. We consider a new store to be successful if it achieves $8 million to $9 million in sales
volume and 4% to 7% in operating margins before other ancillary revenues and allocations of
overhead and advertising in the first full year of operation. We expect successful stores that have
matured, which generally occurs after two to three years of operations, to generate annual sales of
approximately $12 million to $15 million and 9% to 12% in operating margins before other ancillary
revenues and overhead and allocations. However, depending on the credit and insurance penetration
of an individual store, we believe that a store that does not achieve these levels of sales can
still contribute significantly to our pretax margin.
Personnel and compensation.
We staff a typical store with a store manager, an assistant manager, an average of 17 sales
personnel and other support staff including cashiers and/or porters based on store size and
location. Managers have an average tenure with us of approximately five years and typically have
prior sales floor experience. In addition to store managers, we have seven district management
personnel that generally oversee from seven to ten stores in each market. The senior management
team of retail operations have an average of approximately 15 years of experience with us.
We compensate the majority of our sales associates on a straight commission arrangement, while
we generally compensate store managers on a salary basis plus incentives and cashiers at an hourly
rate. In some instances, store managers receive earned commissions plus base salary. We believe
that because our store compensation plans are tied to sales, they generally provide us an advantage
in attracting and retaining highly motivated employees.
- 13 -
Training.
New sales personnel must complete an intensive classroom training program in the markets where
they will be assigned, under the direction of sales management personnel in those markets. We then
require them to spend additional time riding in delivery and service trucks to gain an
understanding of how we serve our customers after the sale is made. Installation and delivery staff
and service personnel receive training through an on-the-job program in which individuals are
assigned to an experienced installation and delivery or service employee as helpers prior to
working alone. In addition, our employees benefit from on-site training conducted by many of our
vendors.
We attempt to identify store manager candidates early in their careers with us and place them
in a defined program of training. They generally first attend our in-house training program, which
provides guidance and direction for the development of managerial and supervisory skills. They then
attend a Dale Carnegie® certified management course that helps solidify their management knowledge
and builds upon their internal training. After completion of these training programs, manager
candidates work as assistant managers for six to twelve months and are then allowed to manage one
of our smaller stores, where they are supervised closely by the stores district manager. We give
new managers an opportunity to operate larger stores as they become more proficient in their
management skills. Each store manager attends mandatory training sessions on a monthly basis and
also attends bi-weekly sales training meetings where participants receive and discuss new product
information.
Marketing
We design our marketing and advertising programs to increase our brand name recognition,
educate consumers about our products and services and generate customer traffic in order to
increase sales. We conduct our advertising programs primarily through newspapers, radio and
television stations, direct mail, telephone and our website. Our promotional programs include the
use of discounts, rebates, product bundling and no-interest financing plans. Our website and the
information contained on our website is not incorporated in this annual report or Form 8-K or any
other document filed with the SEC.
Our website provides customers the ability to purchase our products on-line, offers
information about our selection of products and provides useful information to the consumer on
pricing, features and benefits for each product. Our website also allows the customers residing in
the markets in which we operate retail locations to apply and be considered for credit. The website
currently averages approximately 15,000 visits per day from potential and existing customers and
during fiscal 2010 was a source of retail sales and credit applications. The website is linked to
a call center, allowing us to better assist customers with their credit and product needs.
Distribution and inventory management
We typically locate our stores in close proximity of our four regional distribution centers
located in Houston, San Antonio, Dallas and Beaumont, Texas and smaller cross-dock facilities in
Austin and Harlingen, Texas. This enables us to deliver products to our customers quickly, reduces
inventory requirements at the individual stores and facilitates regionalized inventory and
accounting controls.
In our retail stores we maintain an inventory of fast-moving items and products that the
customer is likely to carry out of the store. Our Distribution Inventory Sales computer system and
the use of scanning technology in our distribution centers allow us to determine, on a real-time
basis, the exact location of any product we sell. If we do not have a product at the desired retail
store at the time of sale, we can provide it through our distribution system on a next day basis.
We maintain a fleet of tractors and trailers that allow us to move products from market to
market and from distribution centers to stores to meet customer needs. We outsource a portion of
our deliveries to a third party. Our fleet of home delivery vehicles enables our highly-trained
delivery and installation specialists, in combination with the outsourced distribution arrangements
to quickly complete the sales process, enhancing customer service. We receive a delivery fee based
on the products sold and the services needed to complete the delivery. Additionally, we are able to
complete deliveries to our
- 14 -
customers on the day after the sale for approximately 94% of our customers who have scheduled
delivery during that timeframe.
Finance operations
General.
We sell our products for cash or for payment through major credit cards and third-party
financing, in addition to offering our customers several financing alternatives through our
proprietary credit programs. In the last three fiscal years, we financed, on average, approximately
61% of our retail sales through one of our two credit programs. We offer our customers a choice of
installment payment plans and revolving credit plans through our primary credit portfolio. We also
offer an installment program through our secondary credit portfolio to a limited number of
customers who do not qualify for credit under our primary credit portfolio. Additionally, the most
credit worthy customers in our primary credit portfolio may be eligible for no-interest financing
plans. We use a third-party finance company to provide a portion of our no-interest financing
offerings.
The following table shows our product and repair service agreements sales, net of returns and
allowances, by method of payment for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|
|
Cash and other credit cards |
|
$ |
267,931 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
$ |
293,131 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
$ |
293,512 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
% |
Primary credit portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
|
340,274 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
390,040 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
|
|
336,337 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
Revolving |
|
|
34,025 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
23,105 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
28,638 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Secondary credit portfolio |
|
|
65,765 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
77,652 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
42,186 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
707,995 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
783,928 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
700,673 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Credit
underwriting.
Our decisions to extend consumer credit to our retail customers are made by our internal
credit underwriting department located at our corporate office separate and distinct from our
retail sales department. The seven senior credit underwriters possess an average of 21 years of
credit experience. These senior underwriters supervise 21 credit underwriters who make credit
granting decisions using our proprietary underwriting process and oversees our credit underwriting
process. Our underwriting process considers one or more of the following elements: credit bureau
reporting; income verification; current income and debt levels; a review of the customers previous
credit history with us; the credit risk of the particular products being purchased; and the level
of the down payment made at the time of purchase.
Our credit programs are managed by our centralized credit underwriting department staff,
independent of sales personnel. As part of our centralized credit approval process, we have
developed a proprietary standardized scoring model that provides preliminary credit decisions,
including down payment amounts and credit terms, based on customer risk, income level, and product
risk. While we automatically approve some credit applications from customers, approximately 85% of
all of our credit decisions are based on evaluation of the customers creditworthiness by a
qualified in-house credit underwriter. As of April 30, 2010, we employed over 620 full-time and
part-time employees who focus on credit approval, collections and credit customer service.
Employees in these operational areas are trained to follow our strict methodology in approving
credit, collecting our accounts, and charging off any uncollectible accounts based on
pre-determined aging criteria, depending on their area of responsibility.
Part of our ability to control delinquency and net charge-off is based on the level of down
payments that we require and the purchase money security interest that we obtain in the product
financed, which reduce our credit risk and increase our customers ability and willingness to meet
their
- 15 -
future obligations. We require the customer to purchase or provide proof of credit property
insurance coverage to offset potential losses relating to theft or damage of the product financed.
Installment accounts are paid over a specified period of time with set monthly payments.
Revolving accounts provide customers with a specified amount which the customer may borrow, repay
and re-borrow so long as the credit limit is not exceeded. Most of our installment accounts provide
for payment over 12 to 36 months, with the average account in the primary credit portfolio
remaining outstanding for approximately 14 to 16 months. Our revolving accounts remain outstanding
approximately 14 to 16 months. During fiscal 2010, approximately 34% of the applications approved
under the primary program were approved automatically through our computer system based on the
customers credit history. The remaining applications, of both new and repeat customers, are sent
to an experienced in-house credit underwriter.
We created our secondary credit portfolio program to meet the needs of those customers who do
not qualify for credit under our primary program, typically due to past credit problems or lack of
credit history. If we cannot approve a customers application for credit under our primary
portfolio, we automatically send the application to the credit staff of our secondary portfolio for
further consideration, using stricter underwriting criteria. The additional requirements include
verification of employment and recent work history, reference checks and higher required down
payment levels. We only offer the installment program to those customers who qualify under these
stricter underwriting criteria, and these customers are not eligible for our no-interest programs.
An experienced, in-house credit underwriter administers the credit approval process for all
applications received under our secondary portfolio program. Most of the installment accounts
approved under this program provide for repayment over 12 to 36 months, with the average account
remaining outstanding for approximately 21 to 23 months.
The following tables present, for comparison purposes, information regarding our two credit
portfolios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
January 31, |
Primary Portfolio (1) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(total outstanding balance in thousands) |
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
511,586 |
|
|
$ |
589,922 |
|
|
$ |
597,360 |
|
|
$ |
589,922 |
|
|
$ |
597,360 |
|
Average outstanding customer balance |
|
$ |
1,287 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
1,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
1,339 |
|
Number of accounts (period end) |
|
|
397,606 |
|
|
|
420,585 |
|
|
|
446,203 |
|
|
|
420,585 |
|
|
|
446,203 |
|
Weighted average credit score of
outstanding balances |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Total applications processed (2) |
|
|
823,627 |
|
|
|
850,538 |
|
|
|
802,765 |
|
|
|
257,840 |
|
|
|
206,422 |
|
Percent of retail sales financed |
|
|
52.9 |
% |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
52.1 |
% |
|
|
48.9 |
% |
|
|
54.7 |
% |
Weighted average origination credit
score of sales financed |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
Total applications approved |
|
|
49.8 |
% |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
51.1 |
% |
|
|
49.9 |
% |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
Average down payment |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Portfolio (1) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(total outstanding balance in thousands) |
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
143,281 |
|
|
$ |
163,591 |
|
|
$ |
138,681 |
|
|
$ |
163,591 |
|
|
$ |
138,681 |
|
Average outstanding customer balance |
|
$ |
1,264 |
|
|
$ |
1,394 |
|
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
|
$ |
1,394 |
|
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
Number of accounts (period end) |
|
|
113,316 |
|
|
|
117,372 |
|
|
|
105,109 |
|
|
|
117,372 |
|
|
|
105,109 |
|
Weighted average credit score of
outstanding balances |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Total applications processed (2) |
|
|
400,592 |
|
|
|
386,126 |
|
|
|
351,613 |
|
|
|
114,133 |
|
|
|
89,615 |
|
Percent of retail sales financed |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Weighted average origination credit
score of sales financed |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
Total applications approved |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
Average down payment |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
- 16 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Portfolio (1) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(total outstanding balance in thousands) |
Total outstanding balance
(period end) |
|
$ |
654,867 |
|
|
$ |
753,513 |
|
|
$ |
736,041 |
|
|
$ |
753,513 |
|
|
$ |
736,041 |
|
Average outstanding customer
balance |
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
|
$ |
1,335 |
|
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
Number of accounts (period end) |
|
|
510,922 |
|
|
|
537,957 |
|
|
|
551,312 |
|
|
|
537,957 |
|
|
|
551,312 |
|
Weighted average credit score
of outstanding balances |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
Total applications processed (2) |
|
|
1,224,219 |
|
|
|
1,236,664 |
|
|
|
1,154,378 |
|
|
|
371,973 |
|
|
|
296,037 |
|
Percent of retail sales financed |
|
|
62.2 |
% |
|
|
62.5 |
% |
|
|
58.1 |
% |
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
|
60.7 |
% |
Weighted average origination
credit score of sales financed |
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
Total applications approved |
|
|
45.3 |
% |
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
41.7 |
% |
|
|
41.7 |
% |
|
|
42.6 |
% |
Average down payment |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Portfolios consist of owned customer receivables and customer receivables sold to our
VIE. |
|
(2) |
|
Unapproved and not declined credit applications in the primary portfolio are automatically
referred to the secondary portfolio. |
Credit monitoring and collections.
In addition to our underwriting personnel, as of April 30, 2010, we employed approximately 600
people in our collections department who service 100% of our consumer credit portfolio. Our
in-house credit financed sales are secured by the products purchased, which we believe gives us a
distinct advantage over other creditors when pursuing collections, especially given that many of
the products we finance are necessities for the home. We employ a very intensive credit collection
strategy that includes dialer-based calls, virtual calling and messaging systems, field collectors
that contact borrowers at their home or place of employment, collection letters, a legal staff that
files lawsuits and attends bankruptcy hearings, and voluntary repossession.
We closely monitor the credit portfolios to identify delinquent accounts early and dedicate
resources to contacting customers concerning past due accounts. We believe that our unique
underwriting model, secured interest in the products financed, required down payments, local
presence, ability to work with customers, relative to their product, service and credit insurance
needs, and the flexible financing alternatives we offer contribute to the historically low net
charge-off rates on these portfolios. In addition, our customers have the opportunity to make their
monthly payments in our stores, and approximately 60% of our active credit accounts did so at some
time during the twelve months ended January 31, 2010. We believe that these factors help us
maintain a relationship with the customer that keeps losses lower while encouraging repeat
purchases.
Our collection activities involve a combination of efforts that take place in our Beaumont,
Texas and San Antonio collection centers, and field collection efforts that involve a visit by one
of our credit counselors to the customers home. We maintain a predictive dialer system, including
virtual collection systems, and letter campaign that helps us contact over 35,000 delinquent
customers daily. We also maintain an experienced skip-trace department that utilizes current
technology to locate customers who have moved and left no forwarding address. Our field collectors
provide on-site contact with the customer to assist in the collection process or, if needed, to
voluntarily repossess the product in the event of non-payment. As part of our effort to work with
our customers to achieve and maintain a habit of making consistent monthly payments on their credit
accounts with us we will, at times, extend their contractual payment terms, also known as reaging,
which usually results in updating the past due status of the account to reflect it as current.
Typically, we will agree to reage an account when a customer has experienced a financial hardship,
such as temporary loss of employment, if, after discussing the situation with the customer, we
validate that they will be able to resume making their regularly scheduled payments. Generally, for
the reage process to be completed, the customer is required to pay interest on the account for the
number of months reaged and at times may require one or more full monthly
- 17 -
payments. An account can be reaged multiple times over its life, but the use of the reage
program is limited and must comply with company guidelines. We believe our reaging programs reduce
our ultimate net charge-offs and enhance our ability to collect the full amounts due to us from
sales under our credit programs and results in building long-term relationships with those
customers that help drive future sales. Repossessions are made when it is clear that the customer
is unwilling to establish a reasonable payment program and voluntarily relinquishes control of the
purchased merchandise to our field collectors. Our legal department processes our legal collection
efforts and helps handle any legal issues associated with the collection process.
Generally, we deem an account to be uncollectible and charge it off if the account is 120 days
or more past due and we have not received a payment in the last seven months. Over the last 36
months, we have recovered approximately 11% of charged-off amounts through our collection
activities. The income that we realize from the customer receivables portfolio that we manage
depends on a number of factors, including expected credit losses. Therefore, it is to our advantage
to maintain a low delinquency rate and net loss ratio on the credit portfolios.
Our accounting and credit staff consistently monitor trends in charge-offs by examining the
various characteristics of the charge-offs, including store of origination, product type, customer
credit and income information, down payment amounts and other identifying information. We track our
charge-offs both gross, before recoveries, and net, after recoveries. We periodically adjust our
credit granting, collection and charge-off policies based on this information.
The following tables reflect the performance of our two credit portfolios, net of unearned
interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
January 31, |
Primary Portfolio (1) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(total outstanding balance in thousands) |
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
511,586 |
|
|
$ |
589,922 |
|
|
$ |
597,360 |
|
|
$ |
589,922 |
|
|
$ |
597,360 |
|
Average total outstanding balance |
|
$ |
465,429 |
|
|
$ |
538,673 |
|
|
$ |
592,376 |
|
|
$ |
579,539 |
|
|
$ |
601,763 |
|
Account balances over 60 days
old (period end) |
|
|
31,558 |
|
|
|
35,153 |
|
|
|
48,775 |
|
|
|
35,153 |
|
|
|
48,775 |
|
Percent of balances over 60 days old
to total outstanding (period end) |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
Total account balances reaged (2) |
|
|
71,883 |
|
|
|
90,560 |
|
|
|
95,038 |
|
|
|
90,560 |
|
|
|
95,038 |
|
Percent of balances reaged to total
outstanding (period end) (2) |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
Account balances reaged more than six
months |
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
36,452 |
|
|
|
35,448 |
|
|
|
36,452 |
|
|
|
35,448 |
|
Bad debt charge-offs (net of
recoveries) |
|
|
12,429 |
|
|
|
15,071 |
|
|
|
20,777 |
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
Percent of charge-offs (net of
recoveries) to average outstanding |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Estimated percent of reage balances
collected (3) |
|
|
89.7 |
% |
|
|
89.5 |
% |
|
|
86.4 |
% |
|
|
89.5 |
% |
|
|
82.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Portfolio (1) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(total outstanding balance in thousands) |
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
143,281 |
|
|
$ |
163,591 |
|
|
$ |
138,681 |
|
|
$ |
163,591 |
|
|
$ |
138,681 |
|
Average total outstanding balance |
|
$ |
141,202 |
|
|
$ |
157,529 |
|
|
$ |
151,380 |
|
|
$ |
163,320 |
|
|
$ |
141,125 |
|
Account balances over 60 days
old (period end) |
|
|
18,220 |
|
|
|
19,988 |
|
|
|
24,616 |
|
|
|
19,988 |
|
|
|
24,616 |
|
Percent of balances over 60 days old
to total outstanding (period end) |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
Total account balances reaged (2) |
|
|
35,844 |
|
|
|
50,602 |
|
|
|
49,135 |
|
|
|
50,602 |
|
|
|
49,135 |
|
Percent of balances reaged to total
outstanding (period end) (2) |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
35.4 |
% |
- 18 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Portfolio (1) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(total outstanding balance in thousands) |
Account balances reaged more than six
months |
|
|
15,599 |
|
|
|
19,860 |
|
|
|
21,920 |
|
|
|
19,860 |
|
|
|
21,920 |
|
Bad debt charge-offs (net of
recoveries) |
|
|
4,989 |
|
|
|
7,291 |
|
|
|
8,165 |
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
Percent of charge-offs (net of
recoveries) to average outstanding |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
Estimated percent of reage balances
collected (3) |
|
|
90.7 |
% |
|
|
89.8 |
% |
|
|
88.7 |
% |
|
|
90.3 |
% |
|
|
86.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Portfolio (1) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(total outstanding balance in thousands) |
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
654,867 |
|
|
$ |
753,513 |
|
|
$ |
736,041 |
|
|
$ |
753,513 |
|
|
$ |
736,041 |
|
Average total outstanding balance |
|
$ |
606,631 |
|
|
$ |
696,202 |
|
|
$ |
743,756 |
|
|
$ |
742,859 |
|
|
$ |
742,888 |
|
Account balances over 60 days
old (period end) |
|
|
49,778 |
|
|
|
55,141 |
|
|
|
73,391 |
|
|
|
55,141 |
|
|
|
73,391 |
|
Percent of balances over 60 days old to
total outstanding (period end) |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Total account balances reaged (2) |
|
|
107,727 |
|
|
|
141,162 |
|
|
|
144,173 |
|
|
|
141,162 |
|
|
|
144,173 |
|
Percent of balances reaged to total
outstanding (period end) (2) |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
Account balances reaged more than six
months |
|
|
51,230 |
|
|
|
56,312 |
|
|
|
57,368 |
|
|
|
56,312 |
|
|
|
57,368 |
|
Bad debt charge-offs (net of recoveries) |
|
|
17,418 |
|
|
|
22,362 |
|
|
|
28,942 |
|
|
|
6,323 |
|
|
|
8,841 |
|
Percent of charge-offs (net of
recoveries) to average outstanding |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Estimated percent of reage balances
collected (3) |
|
|
90.0 |
% |
|
|
89.6 |
% |
|
|
87.2 |
% |
|
|
89.8 |
% |
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Portfolios consist of owned customer receivables and transferred customer receivables
sold to our VIE. |
|
(2) |
|
Unapproved and not declined credit applications in the primary portfolio are automatically
referred to the secondary portfolio. |
|
(3) |
|
Calculated as 1 minus the percent of bad debt charge-offs (net of recoveries) of reage
balances as a percent of average reage balances. The reage bad debt charge-offs are included
as a component of the percent of bad debt charge-offs (net of recoveries) to average
outstanding balance. |
By combining our front-end underwriting discipline with the back-end rigor in monitoring
and collections, we have achieved an average net loss ratio of 3.4% over the past three fiscal
years. As of April 30, 2010, our total portfolio balance was $700.5 million and the percentage of
borrowers who were more than 60 days delinquent was 8.6%. Additionally, we work with our borrowers
after they experience financial hardships in order to help them re-establish their regular payment
habits through our reaging program. As of April 30, 2010, 19.1% of the total portfolio balance had
been reaged during the term of the financing, thereby extending the total term of those customers
financing agreements. For the three months ended April 30, 2010 and the fiscal year ended January
31, 2010, our ratio of net charge-offs as a percentage of our total receivables balance was 4.6%
and 3.9%, respectively.
Product support services
Credit insurance.
Acting as agents for unaffiliated insurance companies, we offer credit life, credit
disability, credit involuntary unemployment and credit property insurance, which we collectively
refer to as credit insurance, at all of our stores on sales financed under our credit programs.
These products cover payment of the customers credit account in the event of the customers death,
disability or involuntary unemployment or if the financed property is lost or damaged. We receive
sales commissions from the unaffiliated insurance company at the time we sell the coverage, and we
receive retrospective commissions, which are additional commissions paid by the insurance carrier
if insurance claims are less than earned premiums.
- 19 -
We require proof of property insurance on all installment credit purchases, although we do not
require that customers purchase this insurance from us. During fiscal 2010, approximately 72.3% of
our credit customers purchased one or more of the credit insurance products we offer, and
approximately 14.9% purchased all of the insurance products we offer. Commission revenues from the
sale of credit insurance contracts represented approximately 2.5%, 2.1% and 1.9% of total revenues
for fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Warranty service.
We provide service for all of the products we sell and only for the products we sell.
Customers purchased repair service agreements that we sell for third-party insurers on products
representing approximately 45.1% of our total product sales for fiscal 2010. These agreements
broaden and extend the period of covered manufacturer warranty service for up to four years from
the date of purchase, depending on the product. These agreements are sold at the time the product
is purchased. Customers may finance the cost of the agreements along with the purchase price of the
associated product. We contact the customer prior to the expiration of the repair service agreement
period to provide them the opportunity to purchase an extended period of coverage for which we are
the direct obligor.
We have contracts with unaffiliated third party insurers that issue the initial repair service
agreements to cover the costs of repairs performed under these agreements. The initial service
agreement is between the customer and the independent third-party insurance company, and, through
our agreements with the third-party insurance company, we are obligated to provide service when it
is needed under each agreement sold. We receive a commission on the sale of the contract, which is
recognized in revenues at the time of the sale, and we receive retrospective commissions, which are
additional commissions paid by the insurance carrier over time if the cost of repair claims are
less than earned premiums. Additionally, we bill the insurance company for the cost of the service
work that we perform. We are the obligor under the renewal contracts sold after the primary
warranty and third-party repair service agreements expire. Under renewal contracts we recognize
revenues received, and direct selling expenses incurred, over the life of the contracts, and
expense the cost of the service work performed as products are repaired. We also sell furniture
protection program agreements at the time of sale of furniture, for which we are the obligor. We
recognize revenues for this program the same as we do for the renewal contracts.
Of the 16,000 repairs, on average, that we perform each month, approximately 47.3% are covered
under repair service agreements, approximately 40.9% are covered by manufacturer warranties and the
remainder are cash and customer accommodation repairs. Revenues from the sale of repair service
agreements and the other product protection products that we sell represented approximately 5.0%,
5.0% and 4.6% of net sales during fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Management information systems
We have a fully integrated management information system that tracks, on a real-time basis,
point-of-sale information, inventory receipt and distribution, merchandise movement and financial
information. The management information system also includes a local area network that connects all
corporate users to e-mail, scheduling and various servers. All of our facilities are linked by a
wide-area network that provides communication for in-house credit authorization and real-time
capture of sales and merchandise movement at the store level. In our distribution centers, we use
wireless terminals to assist in receiving, stock put-away, stock movement, order filling, cycle
counting and inventory management. At our stores, we currently use desktop terminals to provide
sales, and inventory receiving, transferring and maintenance capabilities.
Our integrated management information system also includes extensive functionality for
management of the complete credit portfolio life cycle as well as functionality for the management
of product service. The credit system provides in-house credit underwriting, new account set up and
tracking, credit portfolio reporting, collections, credit employee productivity metrics,
skip-tracing, and bankruptcy, fraud and legal account management. The service system provides for
service order processing, warranty claims processing, parts inventory management, technician
scheduling and
- 20 -
dispatch, technician performance metrics and customer satisfaction measurement. The sales,
credit and service systems share a common customer and product sold database.
Our invoicing system uses an IBM Series i5 hardware system that runs on the i5OS operating
system. This system enables us to use a variety of readily available applications in conjunction
with software that supports the system. All of our current business application software, except
our website, accounting, human resources and credit legal systems, has been developed in-house by
our management information system employees. We believe our management information systems
efficiently support our current operations and provide a foundation for future growth.
We employ Nortel telephone switches and Avaya predictive dialers, as well as a redundant data
network and cable plant, to improve the efficiency of our collection and overall corporate
communication efforts.
As part of our ongoing system availability protection and disaster recovery planning, we have
implemented a secondary IBM Series i5 system. We installed and implemented the back-up IBM Series
i5 system in our corporate offices to provide the ability to switch production processing from the
primary system to the secondary system within thirty minutes should the primary system become
disabled or unreachable. The two machines are kept synchronized utilizing third party software.
This backup system provides high availability of the production processing environment. The
primary IBM Series i5 system is geographically removed from our corporate office for purposes of
disaster recovery and security. Our disaster recovery plan worked as designed during our evacuation
from our corporate headquarters in Beaumont, Texas, due to Hurricane Rita in September 2005, and
Hurricanes Gustav and Ike in September 2008. While we were displaced, our store, distribution and
service operations that were not impacted by the hurricane continued to have normal system
availability and functionality.
Competition
As measured by Twice, the top 100 consumer electronics retailers in the United States reported
electronic sales of $121.3 billion in 2009, a 1.8% increase from the $119.1 billion reported in
2008. The consumer electronics market is highly fragmented with sales coming from large appliance
and electronics superstores, national chains, small regional chains, single-store operators, and
consumer electronics departments of selected department and discount stores. We estimate, based on
data provided in Twice, that Best Buy and Wal-Mart, the two largest consumer electronics retailers,
together accounted for approximately 42% of the total electronics sales attributable to the 100
largest retailers in 2009. According to the most recently available data reported by Twice, based
on revenue in 2009, we were the 35th largest retailer of consumer electronics in the United States.
Based on data published in Twice, the top 100 major appliance retailers reported sales of
approximately $22.6 billion in 2009, down approximately 3.7%
from reported sales in 2008 of
approximately $23.5 billion. The retail appliance market is large and concentrated among a few
major dealers, with sales coming primarily from large appliance and electronics superstores,
national chains, small regional chains and home improvement centers. Sears has been the leader in
the retail appliance market, with a market share of the top 100
retailers of approximately 32% in
2009 and 33% in 2008. Lowes and Home Depot held the second and third place positions,
respectively, in national market share in 2008. According to the most recently available data
reported by Twice, we were the 9th largest appliance retailer
in the United States in 2009.
According to the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis, personal
consumption expenditures for household furniture were estimated to be approximately
$85.8 billion in 2009, down from $92.8 billion in the prior year.
The household furniture and mattress market is highly fragmented with sales
coming from manufacturer-owned stores, independent dealers, furniture centers, specialty sleep
product stores, national and local chains, mass market retailers, department stores and, to a
lesser extent, home improvement centers, decorator showrooms, wholesale clubs, catalog retailers,
and the Internet.
- 21 -
Based on data from the Federal Reserve System, estimated total consumer credit outstanding,
which excludes primarily loans secured by real estate, was $2.45 trillion as of December 31, 2009,
down 4.3% from $2.56 trillion at December 31, 2008. As a result of the recession that began in late
2007, consumers have increased their rate of savings and reduced their level of borrowing to fund
purchases. Consumers obtain credit from banks, credit unions, finance companies and non-financial
businesses that offer credit, including retailers. The credit obtained takes many forms, including
revolving (e.g., credit cards) or fixed-term (e.g., automobile loans) credit, and at times is
secured by the products being purchased.
We compete primarily based on enhanced customer service and customer shopping experience
through our unique sales force training and product knowledge, next day delivery capabilities,
proprietary in-house credit program, guaranteed low prices and product repair service.
Regulation
The extension of credit to consumers is a highly regulated area of our business. Numerous
federal and state laws impose disclosure and other requirements on the origination, servicing and
enforcement of credit accounts. These laws include, but are not limited to, the Federal Truth in
Lending Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Federal Trade Commission Act. State laws impose
limitations on the maximum amount of finance charges that we can charge and also impose other
restrictions on consumer creditors, such as us, including restrictions on collection and
enforcement. We routinely review our contracts and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable
consumer credit laws. Failure on our part to comply with applicable laws could expose us to
substantial penalties and claims for damages and, in certain circumstances, may require us to
refund finance charges already paid and to forego finance charges not yet paid under non-complying
contracts. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable federal and state
consumer credit and collection laws.
Our sale of credit life, credit disability, credit involuntary unemployment and credit
property insurance products is also highly regulated. State laws currently impose disclosure
obligations with respect to our sales of credit and other insurance products similar to those
required by the Federal Truth in Lending Act, impose restrictions on the amount of premiums that we
may charge and require licensing of certain of our employees and operating entities. We believe we
are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to our credit
insurance business.
Employees
As of April 30, 2010, we had approximately 2,500 full-time employees and 200 part-time
employees, of which approximately 1,350 were sales personnel. We offer a comprehensive benefits
package including health, life, short and long term disability, and dental insurance coverage as
well as a 401(k) plan, employee stock purchase plan, paid vacation and holiday pay, for eligible
employees. None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements governing their
employment with us and we believe that our employee relations are good. Conns has a formal dispute
resolution plan that requires mandatory arbitration for employment related issues.
Tradenames and trademarks
We have registered the trademarks Conns and our logos.
Available information.
We are subject to reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the
Exchange Act, and its rules and regulations. The Exchange Act requires us to file reports, proxy
and other information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Copies of these reports, proxy statements and other information can be inspected an copied
at the SEC Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
You may also obtain these materials electronically by accessing the SECs home page on the Internet
at www.sec.gov.
- 22 -
Our board has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for our employees, code of ethics
for our chief executive officer and senior financial professionals and a code of business conduct
and ethics for our board of directors. A copy of these codes are published on our website at
www.conns.com under Investor Relations Corporate Governance. We intend to make all
required disclosures concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, these codes on our website. In
addition, we make available, free of charge on our Internet website, our Annual Report on Form
10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on From 8-K, and amendments to these reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file this material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. You may
review these documents, under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance, by
accessing our website at www.conns.com.
- 23 -
exv99w2
Exhibit 99.2
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth selected historical financial information as of and for the
periods indicated and reflects our retrospective adoption, for all periods presented, of a change
in our accounting for our interest in our variable interest entity, or VIE. See Note 2 in our Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended January 31, 2010 for additional
information. We have provided the following selected historical financial information for your
reference. We have derived the selected statement of operations and balance sheet data as of
January 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 from our
audited consolidated financial statements included as Exhibit 99.4 to this Current Report on Form
8-K. Balance sheet data as of January 31, 2008 and statement of operations data for the years ended
January 31, 2007 and 2006 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements
which do not appear in this in this Current Report on Form 8-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Statement Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
569,877 |
|
|
$ |
623,959 |
|
|
$ |
671,571 |
|
|
$ |
743,729 |
|
|
$ |
667,401 |
|
Repair service agreement commissions, net (1) |
|
|
30,583 |
|
|
|
30,567 |
|
|
|
36,424 |
|
|
|
40,199 |
|
|
|
33,272 |
|
Service revenues (2) |
|
|
20,278 |
|
|
|
22,411 |
|
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
22,115 |
|
Total net sales |
|
|
620,738 |
|
|
|
676,937 |
|
|
|
730,992 |
|
|
|
805,049 |
|
|
|
722,788 |
|
Finance charges and other (3) |
|
|
109,250 |
|
|
|
122,649 |
|
|
|
139,538 |
|
|
|
154,492 |
|
|
|
152,797 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
729,988 |
|
|
$ |
799,586 |
|
|
$ |
870,530 |
|
|
$ |
959,541 |
|
|
$ |
875,585 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy cost |
|
|
422,533 |
|
|
|
466,279 |
|
|
|
508,787 |
|
|
|
580,423 |
|
|
|
534,299 |
|
Cost of parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
5,310 |
|
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
|
8,379 |
|
|
|
9,638 |
|
|
|
10,401 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
208,652 |
|
|
|
225,434 |
|
|
|
245,761 |
|
|
|
254,172 |
|
|
|
255,942 |
|
Goodwill impairment (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
14,519 |
|
|
|
22,173 |
|
|
|
19,465 |
|
|
|
27,952 |
|
|
|
36,843 |
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
$ |
651,014 |
|
|
$ |
720,671 |
|
|
$ |
782,392 |
|
|
$ |
872,185 |
|
|
$ |
847,102 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
78,974 |
|
|
|
78,915 |
|
|
|
88,138 |
|
|
|
87,356 |
|
|
|
28,483 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
17,423 |
|
|
|
21,454 |
|
|
|
24,839 |
|
|
|
23,597 |
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
Other (income) expense (5) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
61,482 |
|
|
|
58,233 |
|
|
|
64,242 |
|
|
|
63,642 |
|
|
|
8,035 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
21,380 |
|
|
|
20,613 |
|
|
|
22,575 |
|
|
|
23,624 |
|
|
|
4,111 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
40,102 |
|
|
$ |
37,620 |
|
|
$ |
41,667 |
|
|
$ |
40,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,924 |
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
23,412 |
|
|
|
23,663 |
|
|
|
23,193 |
|
|
|
22,413 |
|
|
|
22,456 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,088 |
|
|
|
24,289 |
|
|
|
23,673 |
|
|
|
22,577 |
|
|
|
22,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stores open at end of period |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Same stores sales growth (6) |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(13.8 |
)% |
Inventory turns (7) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Gross margin percentage (8) |
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
|
40.8 |
% |
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Operating margin (9) |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Ratio of
earnings to fixed charges (10) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Return on
average equity (11) |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
18,490 |
|
|
$ |
18,425 |
|
|
$ |
18,955 |
|
|
$ |
17,597 |
|
|
$ |
10,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
307,948 |
|
|
$ |
372,668 |
|
|
$ |
387,730 |
|
|
$ |
277,296 |
|
|
$ |
340,122 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
45,179 |
|
|
$ |
56,598 |
|
|
$ |
11,024 |
|
|
$ |
11,909 |
|
|
$ |
12,247 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
73,986 |
|
|
|
87,098 |
|
|
|
81,495 |
|
|
|
95,971 |
|
|
|
63,499 |
|
Other accounts receivable, net |
|
|
17,796 |
|
|
|
22,329 |
|
|
|
27,722 |
|
|
|
32,505 |
|
|
|
23,254 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
721,447 |
|
|
|
810,511 |
|
|
|
835,499 |
|
|
|
957,566 |
|
|
|
892,466 |
|
Total debt, including current maturities |
|
$ |
385,136 |
|
|
$ |
438,198 |
|
|
$ |
468,119 |
|
|
$ |
505,417 |
|
|
$ |
452,304 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
236,962 |
|
|
$ |
274,182 |
|
|
$ |
288,726 |
|
|
$ |
332,784 |
|
|
$ |
339,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
(dollars and shares in thousands) |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Other Relevant Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense
(12) |
|
$ |
18,905 |
|
|
$ |
22,242 |
|
|
$ |
23,703 |
|
Percent of retail sales financed |
|
|
62.2 |
% |
|
|
62.6 |
% |
|
|
58.1 |
% |
Allowance
for bad debts as a percent of average outstanding balance (13) |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Weighted
average monthly payment rate (14) |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes commissions from sales of third-party repair service agreements and
replacement product programs, and income from company-obligor repair service
agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes revenues derived from parts sales and labor sales on products serviced
for customers, both covered under manufacturer warranty and outside manufacturers
warranty coverage. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes primarily interest income and fees earned on credit accounts and
commissions earned from the sale of third-party credit insurance products. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes the write-off of the carrying amount of goodwill after interim testing
in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 determined that the goodwill was fully impaired. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes primarily gains or losses resulting from sales of fixed assets during
the period. |
|
(6) |
|
Same store sales is calculated by comparing the reported sales for all stores
that were open during the entirety of a period and the entirety of the same period
during the prior fiscal year. Sales from closed stores, if any, are removed from each
period. Sales from relocated stores have been included in each period because each such
store was relocated within the same general geographic market. Sales from expanded
stores have been included in each period. |
|
(7) |
|
Inventory turns are defined as the cost of goods sold, excluding warehousing
and occupancy cost, divided by the monthly average product inventory balance, excluding
consigned goods. |
|
(8) |
|
Gross margin percentage is defined as total revenues less cost of goods and
parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy cost, divided by total revenues. |
|
(9) |
|
Operating margin is defined as operating income divided by total revenues. |
|
(10) |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges is calculated as income
before provision for income taxes plus fixed charges (excluding
capitalized interest), divided by fixed charges.
Fixed charges consist of the sum of interest expensed and
capitalized, amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses
related to indebtedness and an estimate of the interest within rental
expense. |
- 2 -
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Return on average equity is calculated as current period net income divided by
the average of the beginning and ending equity. |
|
(12) |
|
Rent expense includes rent expense incurred on our properties, equipment and
vehicles, and is net of any rental income received. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes Reserve for uncollectible interest. |
|
(14) |
|
Represents the monthly weighted average of gross cash collections received on
the credit portfolio as a percentage of the average monthly portfolio balances for each
period. |
- 3 -
exv99w3
Exhibit 99.3
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included as
Exhibit 99.4 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
This report includes statements that express our opinions, expectations, beliefs, plans,
objectives, assumptions or projections regarding future events or future results, and therefore
are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements can
generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms believes,
estimates, anticipates, expects, estimates, seeks, projects, intends, plans, may,
will or should or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology.
These forward-looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to
events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. We believe that these
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
our inability to maintain compliance with debt covenant requirements, including taking
the actions necessary to maintain compliance with the covenants, such as obtaining
amendments to the borrowing facilities that modify the covenant requirements, which could
result in higher borrowing costs; |
|
|
|
|
reduced availability under our revolving credit facility as a result of borrowing base
requirements and the impact on the borrowing base calculation of changes in the performance
or eligibility of the customer receivables financed by that facility; |
|
|
|
|
the success of our growth strategy and plans regarding opening new stores and entering
adjacent and new markets, including our plans to continue expanding into existing markets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to open and profitably operate new stores in existing, adjacent and new
geographic markets; |
|
|
|
|
our intention to update or expand existing stores; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to introduce additional product categories; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain capital for required capital expenditures and costs related to the
opening of new stores or to update, relocate or expand existing stores; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to fund our operations, capital expenditures, debt repayment and expansion
from cash flows from operations, borrowings from our revolving line of credit and proceeds
from securitizations, and proceeds from accessing debt or equity markets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional funding for the purpose of funding the customer
receivables generated by us, including limitations on our ability to obtain financing
through our commercial paper-based funding sources and our ability to maintain the current
credit rating issued by a recognized statistical rating organization; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to renew or replace our revolving credit facility on or before its maturity
date; |
|
|
|
|
the cost or terms of any amended, renewed or replacement credit facilities; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the financial institutions to provide lending facilities to us and fund
their commitments; |
- 1 -
|
|
|
the effect of any downgrades by rating agencies on our borrowing costs; |
|
|
|
|
the effect on our borrowing cost of changes in laws and regulations affecting the
providers of debt financing; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of rising interest rates or borrowing spreads that could increase our cost of
borrowing or reduce securitization income; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of rising interest rates or other economic conditions on mortgage borrowers
that could impair our customers ability to make payments on outstanding credit accounts; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to make customer financing programs available that allow consumers to
purchase products at levels that can support our growth and maintain profitable operations; |
|
|
|
|
the potential for deterioration in the delinquency status of our credit portfolio or
higher than historical net charge-offs in the customer receivables portfolio could
adversely impact earnings; |
|
|
|
|
technological and market developments, growth trends and projected sales in the home
appliance and consumer electronics industry, including, with respect to digital products
like Blu-ray players, HDTV, LED and 3-D televisions, GPS devices, home networking devices
and other new products, and our ability to capitalize on such growth; |
|
|
|
|
the potential for price erosion or lower unit sales points that could result in declines
in revenues; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of changes in oil and gas prices that could adversely affect our customers
shopping decisions and patterns, as well as the cost of our delivery and service operations
and our cost of products, if vendors pass on their additional fuel costs through increased
pricing for products; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; |
|
|
|
|
both the short-term and long-term impact of adverse weather conditions (e.g. hurricanes)
that could result in volatility in our revenues and increased expenses and casualty losses; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulations and/or interest, premium and commission rates allowed by
regulators on our credit, credit insurance, repair service and product replacement
agreements as allowed by those laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
our relationships with key suppliers and their ability to provide products at
competitive prices and support sales of their products through their rebate and discount
programs; |
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our distribution and information systems and management experience to
support our expansion plans; |
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our expectations regarding competition and our competitive advantages; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our stock price or the number of shares we have outstanding; |
|
|
|
|
the potential for market share erosion that could result in reduced revenues; |
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our expectations regarding the similarity or dissimilarity of our
existing markets as compared to new markets we enter; |
|
|
|
|
the use of third parties to complete certain of our distribution, delivery and home
repair services; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions in the regions in which we operate; and |
- 2 -
|
|
|
the outcome of litigation or government investigations affecting our business. |
Additional important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our
expectations are discussed under Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. These factors
should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read with the other cautionary statements in
this report.
Although we base these forward-looking statements on assumptions that we believe are reasonable
when made, we caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance
and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development
of the industry in which we operate may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the
forward-looking statements contained in this report. In addition, even if our results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we
operate are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this report, those results
or developments may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods.
Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements which we make in this report speak only
as of the date of such statement, and we do not undertake, and specifically decline, any obligation
to update such statements or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any such
statements to reflect future events or developments. Comparisons of results for current and any
prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance,
unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.
- 3 -
General
We intend the following discussion and analysis to provide you with a better understanding of
the financial condition and performance of our retail and credit segments for the indicated
periods, including an analysis of those key factors that contributed to our financial condition and
performance and that are, or are expected to be, the key drivers of our business.
Through our 76 retail stores, we provide products and services to our customers in seven
primary market areas, including Houston, San Antonio/Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth, southern Louisiana,
Southeast and South Texas and Oklahoma. Products and services offered through retail sales outlets
include home appliances, consumer electronics, home office equipment, lawn and garden products,
mattresses, furniture, repair service agreements, customer credit programs, including installment
and revolving credit account programs, and various credit insurance products. These activities are
supported through our extensive service, warehouse and distribution system. Our stores bear the
Conns name, after our founders family, and deliver the same products and services to our
customers. All of our stores follow the same procedures and methods in managing their operations.
Our management evaluates performance and allocates resources based on
the operating results of its retail and credit segments.
The five cornerstones of our business which represent, in our view, the five components of our
business model that drive profitability are strong merchandising systems, flexible credit
options for our customers, extensive warehousing and distribution systems, service systems to
support our customers needs during and beyond the product warranty periods, and our uniquely,
well-trained employees in each area. Each of these systems combine to create a nuts and bolts
support system for our customers needs and desires. Each of these systems is discussed at length
in our Business discussion included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
We derive the majority of our revenues from our product sales and repair service agreement
commissions, which are generated by sales of third-party and company-obligor repair service
agreements and product replacement policies. However, unlike many of our competitors, we provide
in-house credit options for our customers product purchases. Additionally, we derive a portion of
our revenues from the sale of credit insurance products of third-party insurers to our customers.
In the last three years, we have financed, on average, approximately 61% of our retail sales
through our credit programs. We offer our customers a choice of installment payment plans and
revolving credit plans through our primary credit portfolio. We also offer an installment program
through our secondary credit portfolio to a limited number of customers who do not qualify for
credit under our primary credit portfolio. In addition to interest-bearing installment and
revolving charge contracts, at times, we offer promotional credit programs to certain of our
primary credit portfolio customers that provide for same as cash or deferred interest
interest-free periods of varying terms, generally three, six, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months, and require
monthly payments beginning in the month after the sale. In turn, we finance substantially all of
our customer receivables from these credit options through our revolving credit facility and an
asset-backed securitization facility. In addition to our own credit programs, we use third-party
financing programs to provide a portion of the non-interest bearing financing for purchases made by
our customers. As part of our asset-backed securitization facility, we have created a
bankruptcy-remote variable interest entity, which we refer to as the VIE, to purchase customer
receivables from us and to issue medium-term and variable funding notes secured by the customer
receivables to finance its acquisition of the customer receivables. We transfer eligible customer
receivables, consisting of retail installment and revolving account receivables extended to our
customers, to the VIE in exchange for cash and subordinated securities. The VIE is consolidated in
our financial statements. Customer receivables not sold to the VIE have been funded by our
revolving credit facility.
While our warehouse and distribution system does not directly generate revenues, other than
the fees paid by our customers for delivery and installation of the products to their homes, it is
our extra, value-added program that our existing customers have come to rely on, and our new
customers are hopefully sufficiently impressed with to become repeat customers. We derive revenues
from our repair services on the products we sell. Additionally, acting as an agent for unaffiliated
companies, we sell credit insurance to protect our customers from credit losses due to death,
disability, involuntary unemployment and damage to the products they have purchased to the extent
they do not already have it.
- 4 -
Application of critical accounting policies
In applying the accounting policies that we use to prepare our consolidated financial
statements, we necessarily make accounting estimates that affect our reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. Some of these accounting estimates require us to make
assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time we make the accounting estimates.
We base these assumptions and the resulting estimates on authoritative pronouncements, historical
information and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, and we
evaluate these assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. We could reasonably use different
accounting estimates, and changes in our accounting estimates could occur from period to period,
with the result in each case being a material change in the financial statement presentation of our
financial condition or results of operations. We refer to accounting estimates of this type as
critical accounting estimates. We believe that the critical accounting estimates discussed below
are among those most important to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements.
Customer accounts receivable.
Customer accounts receivable reported in our consolidated balance sheet include receivables
transferred to our VIE and those receivables not transferred to our VIE. We include the amount of
principal and accrued interest on those receivables that are expected to be collected within the
next twelve months, based on contractual terms, in current assets on our consolidated balance
sheet. Those amounts expected to be collected after twelve months, based on contractual terms, are
included in long-term assets. Typically, a receivable is considered delinquent if a payment has not
been received on the scheduled due date. Additionally, we offer reage programs to customers with
past due balances that have experienced a financial hardship, if they meet the conditions of our
reage policy. Reaging a customers account can result in updating it from a delinquent status to a
current status. Generally, an account that is delinquent more than 120 days and for which no
payment has been received in the past seven months will be charged-off against the allowance for
doubtful accounts and interest accrued subsequent to the last payment will be reversed. We have a
secured interest in the merchandise financed by these receivables and therefore have the
opportunity to recover a portion of any charged-off amount.
Interest income on customer accounts receivable.
Interest income is accrued using the Rule of 78s method for installment contracts and the
simple interest method for revolving charge accounts, and is reflected in Finance charges and
other. Typically, interest income is accrued until the contract or account is paid off or
charged-off and we provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible interest. Interest income is
recognized on our interest-free promotional accounts based on our historical experience related to
customers who fail to satisfy the requirements of the interest-free programs. Additionally, for
sales on deferred interest and same as cash programs that exceed one year in duration, we
discount the sales to their fair value, resulting in a reduction in sales and receivables, and
amortize the discount amount in to Finance charges and other over the term of the program.
Allowance for doubtful accounts.
We record an allowance for doubtful accounts, including estimated uncollectible interest, for
our Customer accounts receivable, based on our historical net loss experience and expectations for
future losses. The net charge-off data used in computing the loss rate is reduced by the amount of
post-charge-off recoveries received, including cash payments, and amounts realized from the
repossession of the products financed and, at times, payments received under credit insurance
policies. Additionally, we separately evaluate the Primary and Secondary portfolios when estimating
the allowance for doubtful accounts. The balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts and
uncollectible interest for customer receivables was $26.9 million and $35.8 million, at January 31,
2009, and 2010, respectively. Additionally, as a result of our practice of reaging customer
accounts, if the account is not ultimately collected, the timing and amount of the charge-off is
impacted. If these accounts had been charged-off sooner the net loss rates might have been higher.
Reaged customer receivable balances represented 19.6% of the total portfolio balance at January 31,
2010. If the loss rate used to calculate the allowance for doubtful accounts was increased by 10%
at January 31, 2010, we would have increased our Provision for bad debts by approximately $3.6
million for fiscal 2010.
- 5 -
Revenue recognition.
Revenues from the sale of retail products are recognized at the time the customer takes
possession of the product. Such revenues are recognized net of any adjustments for sales incentive
offers such as discounts, coupons, rebates, or other free products or services and discounts of
promotional credit sales that will extend beyond one year. We sell repair service agreements and
credit insurance contracts on behalf of unrelated third parties. For contracts where the third
parties are the obligors on the contract, commissions are recognized in revenues at the time of
sale, and in the case of retrospective commissions, at the time that they are earned. Where we sell
repair service renewal agreements in which we are deemed to be the obligor on the contract at the
time of sale, revenue is recognized ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the term of the repair
service agreement. These repair service agreements are renewal contracts that provide our customers
protection against product repair costs arising after the expiration of the manufacturers warranty
and the third party obligor contracts. These agreements typically have terms ranging from 12 to 36
months. These agreements are separate units of accounting and are valued based on the agreed upon
retail selling price. The amount of repair service agreement revenues deferred at January 31, 2009
and 2010 were $7.2 million and $7.3 million, respectively, and are included in Deferred revenues
and allowances in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The amounts of repair service
agreement revenue recognized for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 were $5.7
million, $6.5 million and $7.0 million, respectively.
Vendor allowances.
We receive funds from vendors for price protection, product rebates (earned upon purchase or
sale of product), marketing, training and promotion programs which are recorded on the accrual
basis as a reduction to the related product cost, cost of goods sold, compensation expense or
advertising expense, according to the nature of the program. We accrue rebates based on the
satisfaction of terms of the program and sales of qualifying products even though funds may not be
received until the end of a quarter or year. If the programs are related to product purchases, the
allowances, credits or payments are recorded as a reduction of product cost; if the programs are
related to product sales, the allowances, credits or payments are recorded as a reduction of cost
of goods sold; if the programs are directly related to promotion, marketing or compensation expense
paid related to the product, the allowances, credits, or payments are recorded as a reduction of
the applicable expense in the period in which the expense is incurred. We received $36.1 million,
$46.2 million and $51.3 million in vendor allowances during the fiscal years ended January 31,
2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, of which $6.6 million, $6.4 million and $5.1 million,
respectively, represented advertising assistance allowances. The increase in fiscal year 2010 was
due to increased use of instant rebates by vendors to drive sales. Over the past three years we
have received funds from approximately 50 vendors, with the terms of the programs ranging between
one month and one year.
Accounting for leases.
We analyze each lease, at its inception and any subsequent renewal, to determine whether it
should be accounted for as an operating lease or a capital lease. Additionally, monthly lease
expense for each operating lease is calculated as the average of all payments required under the
minimum lease term, including rent escalations. Generally, the minimum lease term begins with the
date we take possession of the property and ends on the last day of the minimum lease term, and
includes all rent holidays, but excludes renewal terms that are at our option. Any tenant
improvement allowances received are deferred and amortized into income as a reduction of lease
expense on a straight line basis over the minimum lease term. The amortization of leasehold
improvements is computed on a straight line basis over the shorter of the remaining lease term or
the estimated useful life of the improvements. For transactions that qualify for treatment as a
sale-leaseback, any gain or loss is deferred and amortized as rent expense on a straight-line basis
over the minimum lease term. Any deferred gain would be included in Deferred gain on sale of
property and any deferred loss would be included in Other assets on the consolidated balance
sheets.
Year ended January 31, 2009 compared to the year ended January 31, 2010
Executive overview
This overview is intended to provide an executive level overview of our operations for our
fiscal year ended January 31, 2010. Our performance during fiscal 2010 was impacted by the
slowdown in the
- 6 -
economy and rising unemployment in our markets that occurred during the year. Following are
significant financial items in managements view:
|
|
|
Our revenues for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, decreased by 8.7%, or $83.9
million, from fiscal year 2009, to $875.6 million due primarily to a decline in product
sales and related reduction in repair service agreement commissions. Sales declined during
the year largely as a result of the slowdown in the economic conditions in our markets,
reduced average selling prices for televisions and were also impacted by tighter credit
underwriting standards implemented during the year to improve the credit quality of our
consumer receivable portfolio. Our same store sales declined 13.8% in the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2010, as compared to an increase of 2.0% for fiscal 2009, with the sharpest
decline occurring in the fourth quarter, when same store sales fell 31.7%. |
|
|
|
|
The addition of stores in our existing Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, Southeast and South
Texas markets and the opening of three stores in Oklahoma in fiscal 2009 had a positive
impact on our revenues. We achieved approximately $20.3 million of increases in product
sales and repair service agreement (RSA) commissions for the year ended January 31, 2010,
from the opening of nine new stores in these markets since February 2008. While we have no
current plans to open additional stores, we have additional sites under consideration for
future development and continue to evaluate our store opening plans for future periods,
provided we have adequate capital availability. |
|
|
|
|
Deferred interest and same as cash plans continue to be an important part of our sales
promotion plans and are utilized to provide a wide variety of financing to enable us to
appeal to a broader customer base. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, $130.7
million, or 19.6%, of our product sales were financed by deferred interest and same as
cash plans. We have been able to reduce the volume of promotional credit as a percent of
product sales, as compared to the prior year. For the comparable period in the prior year,
product sales financed by deferred interest and same as cash sales were $155.8 million,
or 21.0%. Our promotional credit programs (same as cash and deferred interest programs),
which require monthly payments, are reserved for our highest credit quality customers,
thereby reducing the overall risk in the portfolio, and are used primarily to finance sales
of our highest margin products. We expect to continue to offer extended term promotional
credit in the future. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, we began offering
promotional credit programs through third-party consumer credit programs, which financed
$15.3 million of our product and repair service agreement sales during the year. |
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other decreased 1.1% for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010,
when compared to the same period last year, primarily due to a decline in insurance
commissions and retrospective commissions on our repair service agreements, which offset a
slight increase in interest income and other fees. |
|
|
|
|
Our gross margin, defined as total revenues less cost of goods and parts sold, was 37.8%
for fiscal 2010, a decrease from 38.5% in fiscal 2009, primarily as a result of: |
|
o |
|
reduced gross margin realized on product sales from 22.0% in the year
ended January 31, 2009, to 19.9% in fiscal year 2010, which negatively impacted the
total gross margin by 150 basis points. The product gross margins were negatively
impacted by a highly price-competitive retail market and our successful strategy
early in the fiscal year to grow market share through competitive pricing, and |
|
|
o |
|
a change in the revenue mix in the year ended January 31, 2010, such
that higher gross margin finance charge and other revenues contributed a larger
percentage of total revenues, partially offset by reduced revenue contribution from
repair service agreement commissions, which contributed a smaller percentage of
total revenues, and resulted in an increase in the total gross margin of
approximately 80 basis points. |
|
|
|
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, Selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expense increased as a percent of revenues to 29.2% from 26.5% in the prior year
period, primarily due to the litigation reserves we established to reflect our best
estimate of the amount we expect will be required to settle outstanding litigation as well
as the increase in expenses |
- 7 -
|
|
|
related to the new stores opened during the prior fiscal year and the general de-leveraging
effect of the decline in same store sales. |
|
|
|
|
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, we determined, as a result of the
sustained decline in our market capitalization, the increasingly challenging economic
environment and its impact on our comparable store sales, credit portfolio performance and
operating results, that an interim goodwill impairment test was necessary. A two-step
method was utilized for determining goodwill impairment. Our valuation was performed
utilizing the services of outside valuation consultants using both an income approach
utilizing our discounted debt-free cash flows and comparable valuation multiples. Upon
completion of the impairment test, we concluded that the carrying value of our recorded
goodwill was impaired. As a result, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $9.6
million to write-off the carrying value of our goodwill during the three month period ended
October 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
The provision for bad debts increased to $36.8 million in fiscal 2010, from $28.0
million in the prior year. This increase is due to higher actual and expected net credit
charge-offs on customer receivables. Actual net charge-offs increased approximately $6.6
million, or 29.4%, in fiscal 2010, compared to fiscal 2009. As a result of the recent
credit portfolio performance and expectations about future net charge-offs, the bad debt
and uncollectible interest reserves for customer receivables were increased, as a percent
of the customer receivable balance, to 5.0% at January 31, 2010, from 3.6% at January 31,
2009. |
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense decreased in fiscal 2010, due primarily to reduced outstanding debt
balances. |
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes was negatively impacted by the effect of the taxes for
the state of Texas, which are based on gross margin, instead of income before taxes. |
Operational changes and outlook
We have implemented, continued to focus on, or modified operating initiatives that we believe
will positively impact future results, including:
|
|
|
Increased emphasis on sales of furniture and mattresses by enhancing our product
offerings and displays; |
|
|
|
|
Increased emphasis on improving gross margin; and |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted credit underwriting guidelines to improve the credit quality and
profitability of our in-house credit programs. |
During the year, we opened one new store in the Houston market and one in the Dallas/Fort
Worth market and closed two of our clearance centers, one in the Houston market and one in the San
Antonio market. We have additional areas under consideration for future store locations and
continue to evaluate our store opening plans for future periods, provided we have adequate capital
availability.
In order to improve the credit quality of our credit portfolio and reduce the amount of
capital used in our credit operations, we reduced the amount of credit granted as a percentage of
sales during the past fiscal year. Additionally, as a result of these changes, we have seen the mix
between the primary and secondary customer receivables portfolios shift to a greater proportion of
the customer receivables being in the higher quality primary portfolio.
While we benefited from our operations being concentrated in the Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma
region in the earlier months of 2009, recent weakness in the national and state economies,
including instability in the financial markets, declining consumer confidence and the volatility of
oil prices, have and will present significant challenges to our operations in the coming quarters.
Specifically, future sales volumes, gross profit margins and credit portfolio performance could be
negatively impacted, and thus impact our overall profitability. Additionally, declines in our
future operating performance could impact compliance with our credit facility covenants, which we
recently renegotiated to avoid potentially triggering the default provisions of our credit
facilities. As a result, while we will strive to maintain our market share, improve credit
portfolio performance and reduce expenses, we will also work to maintain our access to the
liquidity necessary to maintain our operations through these challenging times.
- 8 -
Results of operations
The following table sets forth certain statement of operations information as a percentage of
total revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
|
77.2 |
% |
|
|
77.5 |
% |
|
|
76.2 |
% |
Repair service agreement commissions (net) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing
and occupancy costs |
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
Cost of parts sold, including warehousing
and occupancy costs |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
89.8 |
|
|
|
90.9 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Analysis of consolidated statements of operations
The presentation of our gross margins may not be comparable to other retailers since we
include the cost of our in-home delivery service as part of selling, general and administrative
expense. Similarly, we include the cost of merchandising our products, including amounts related to
purchasing the product in selling, general and administrative expense. It is our understanding that
other retailers may include such costs as part of cost of goods sold.
The following table presents certain operations information, on a consolidated and segment
basis, in dollars and percentage changes from year to year:
Total Consolidated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
(in thousands except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
671,571 |
|
|
$ |
743,729 |
|
|
$ |
667,401 |
|
|
$ |
72,158 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
$(76,328 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
)% |
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) |
|
|
36,424 |
|
|
|
40,199 |
|
|
|
33,272 |
|
|
|
3,775 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
(6,927 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
Service revenues |
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
22,115 |
|
|
|
(1,876 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
730,992 |
|
|
|
805,049 |
|
|
|
722,788 |
|
|
|
74,057 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
(82,261 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
Finance charges and other |
|
|
139,538 |
|
|
|
154,492 |
|
|
|
152,797 |
|
|
|
14,954 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
(1,695 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
870,530 |
|
|
|
959,541 |
|
|
|
875,585 |
|
|
|
89,011 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
(83,956 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods and parts sold |
|
|
517,166 |
|
|
|
590,061 |
|
|
|
544,700 |
|
|
|
72,895 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
(45,361 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
353,364 |
|
|
|
369,480 |
|
|
|
330,885 |
|
|
|
16,116 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(38,595 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
Gross Margin |
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
233,633 |
|
|
|
241,631 |
|
|
|
241,930 |
|
|
|
7,998 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,128 |
|
|
|
12,541 |
|
|
|
14,012 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
- 9 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
(in thousands except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
19,465 |
|
|
|
27,952 |
|
|
|
36,843 |
|
|
|
8,487 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
8,891 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
88,138 |
|
|
|
87,356 |
|
|
|
28,483 |
|
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(58,873 |
) |
|
|
(67.4 |
) |
Operating Margin |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
24,839 |
|
|
|
23,597 |
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(3,026 |
) |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
(112.4 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(205.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax Income |
|
|
64,242 |
|
|
|
63,642 |
|
|
|
8,035 |
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(55,607 |
) |
|
|
(87.4 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
22,575 |
|
|
|
23,624 |
|
|
|
4,111 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(19,513 |
) |
|
|
(82.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
41,667 |
|
|
$ |
40,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,924 |
|
|
|
$(1,649 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
)% |
|
|
$(36,094 |
) |
|
|
(90.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
(in thousands except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
671,571 |
|
|
$ |
743,729 |
|
|
$ |
667,401 |
|
|
$ |
72,158 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
$(76,328 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
)% |
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) (a) |
|
|
44,735 |
|
|
|
50,778 |
|
|
|
44,119 |
|
|
|
6,043 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
(6,659 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
Service revenues |
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
22,115 |
|
|
|
(1,876 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
739,303 |
|
|
|
815,628 |
|
|
|
733,635 |
|
|
|
76,325 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
(81,993 |
|
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
127.5 |
|
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
|
|
(75.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
740,253 |
|
|
|
817,789 |
|
|
|
734,167 |
|
|
|
77,536 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
(83,622 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods and parts sold |
|
|
517,166 |
|
|
|
590,061 |
|
|
|
544,700 |
|
|
|
72,895 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
(45,361 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
223,087 |
|
|
|
227,728 |
|
|
|
189,467 |
|
|
|
4,641 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(38,261 |
) |
|
|
(16.8 |
) |
Gross Margin |
|
|
30.1 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense (b) |
|
|
179,354 |
|
|
|
182,703 |
|
|
|
180,911 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(1,792 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,331 |
|
|
|
11,218 |
|
|
|
12,288 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1,070 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
32,212 |
|
|
|
33,647 |
|
|
|
(3,829 |
) |
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(37,476 |
) |
|
|
(111.4 |
) |
Operating Margin |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
(112.4 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(205.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) before income
taxes |
|
$ |
33,155 |
|
|
$ |
33,530 |
|
|
|
$(3,706 |
) |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
$(37,236 |
) |
|
|
111.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
(in thousands except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) (a) |
|
$ |
(8,311 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,579 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,847 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(27.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
(268 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
(8,311 |
) |
|
|
(10,579 |
) |
|
|
(10,847 |
) |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
138,588 |
|
|
|
152,331 |
|
|
|
152,265 |
|
|
|
13,743 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
130,277 |
|
|
|
141,752 |
|
|
|
141,418 |
|
|
|
11,475 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense (b) |
|
|
54,279 |
|
|
|
58,928 |
|
|
|
61,019 |
|
|
|
4,649 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
- 10 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
(in thousands except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
19,275 |
|
|
|
27,792 |
|
|
|
36,746 |
|
|
|
8,517 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
8,954 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
55,926 |
|
|
|
53,709 |
|
|
|
32,312 |
|
|
|
(2,217 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(21,397 |
) |
|
|
(39.8 |
) |
Operating Margin |
|
|
42.9 |
% |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
24,839 |
|
|
|
23,597 |
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(3,026 |
) |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income before income taxes |
|
$ |
31,087 |
|
|
$ |
30,112 |
|
|
$ |
11,741 |
|
|
$ |
(975 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
(18,371 |
) |
|
|
(61.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Retail repair service agreement commissions exclude repair
service agreement cancellations that are the result of consumer
credit account charge-offs. These amounts are reflected in
repair service agreement commissions for the credit segment. |
|
(b) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses include the
direct expenses of the retail and credit operations, allocated
overhead expenses and a charge to the credit segment to
reimburse the retail segment for expenses it incurs related to
occupancy, personnel, advertising and other direct costs of the
retail segment which benefit the credit operations by sourcing
credit customers and collecting payments. The reimbursement
received by the retail segment from the credit segment is
estimated using an annual rate of 2.5% times the average
portfolio balance for each applicable period. The amount of
overhead allocated to each segment was approximately $7.4
million, $9.6 million and $9.1 million for the fiscal years
ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amount
of reimbursement made to the retail segment by the credit
segment was approximately $18.6 million, $17.4 million and $15.2
million for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively. |
Year ended January 31, 2010 compared to the year ended January 31, 2009.
Refer to the above Analysis of consolidated statements of operations while reading the operations
review on a year-by-year basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
722.8 |
|
|
$ |
805.1 |
|
|
|
(82.3 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
Finance charges and other |
|
|
152.8 |
|
|
|
154.4 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
875.6 |
|
|
$ |
959.5 |
|
|
|
(83.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $82.3 million decrease in net sales was made up of the following:
|
|
|
a $104.5 million decrease resulted from a same store sales decrease of 13.8%, |
|
|
|
|
a $20.2 million increase generated by nine retail locations that were not open for
twelve consecutive months in each period, |
|
|
|
|
a $1.0 million increase resulted from a decrease in discounts on promotional credit
sales, and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.0 million increase resulted from an increase in service revenues. |
The components of the $82.3 million decrease in net sales were a $76.3 million decrease in
product sales and a $5.9 million net decrease in repair service agreement commissions and service
revenues. The $76.3 million decrease in product sales resulted from the following:
|
|
|
approximately $40.2 million decrease attributable to an overall decrease in the average
unit price. The decrease was due primarily to declines in the average unit price in
consumer electronics, furniture, bedding and track, partially offset by an increase in the
average unit price for appliances. Consumer electronics, driven primarily by televisions,
saw the largest decline with a 26.0% drop in the average unit price, and |
|
|
|
|
approximately $36.1 million was attributable to decreases in unit sales, due primarily
to reduced sales in appliances and track unit sales, partially offset by increases in
consumer electronics (especially flat-panel televisions), furniture and bedding sales. |
- 11 -
The $5.9 million decrease in repair service agreement commissions and service revenues
consisted of:
|
|
|
a $6.6 million decrease in the repair service agreement commissions of the retail
segment due primarily to the decline in product sales and due to reduced emphasis on this
product as a result of our monitoring of the program offered to consumers and the training
of our sales associates, in response to the Texas Attorney Generals litigation; |
|
|
|
|
a $0.3 million decrease in the repair service agreement commissions of the credit
segment due to the higher level of charge-offs experienced; and |
|
|
|
|
$1.0 million increase in the service revenues of the retail segment due primarily to
increased parts sales. |
The following table presents the makeup of net sales by product category in each period,
including repair service agreement commissions and service revenues, expressed both in dollar
amounts and as a percent of total net sales. Classification of sales has been adjusted from
previous filings to ensure comparability between the categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Category (dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
change |
|
Consumer electronics |
|
$ |
305,056 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
$ |
262,751 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
(13.9 |
)%(1) |
Home appliances |
|
|
221,474 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
208,470 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) (2) |
Track |
|
|
109,799 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
97,463 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
(11.2 |
) (3) |
Furniture and mattresses |
|
|
68,869 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
68,208 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) (4) |
Other |
|
|
38,531 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
30,509 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
(20.8 |
) (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product sales |
|
|
743,729 |
|
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
667,401 |
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) |
|
|
40,199 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
33,272 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) (6) |
Service revenues |
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
22,115 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
805,049 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
722,788 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(10.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This decrease is due to a 26.0% decline in average selling prices on flat-panel
televisions, partially offset by an increase in total units sold (increased LCD and plasma unit
sales were partially offset by a decline in projection television unit sales). |
|
(2) |
|
The home appliance category declined as lower unit sales across the category were partially
offset by higher average selling prices, as the appliance market in general showed continued
weakness. |
|
(3) |
|
The decrease in track sales (consisting largely of computers, computer peripherals, video game
equipment, portable electronics and small appliances) is driven primarily by reduced video game
equipment, computer monitor, printer, GPS device, camera, camcorder and audio equipment sales.
Sales from netbooks and desktop and laptop computers were essentially flat as lower average
selling prices offset a 24.4% increase in unit sales of these products. |
|
(4) |
|
This decrease is due to the slower economic conditions in our markets in the last half of the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Other category includes lawn and garden, delivery and other miscellaneous items. This category
declined primarily due to reduced generator sales as we benefited from an increase in sales of
generators in the areas affected by the hurricanes in the prior fiscal year that impacted certain
of our markets. Additionally, lower lawn and garden sales due to the drought conditions
experienced in many of our markets impacted sales in this category. The decline was also impacted
by a reduction in the total number of deliveries due largely to the overall decline in sales. |
|
(6) |
|
The repair service agreement commissions decreased due to reduced emphasis on this product as
a result of our monitoring of the program offered to consumers and the training of our sales
associates, in response to the Texas Attorney Generals litigation. We expect sales in this area
to trend towards our historical performance levels over time due to the enhancements made as a
result of the review. |
|
(7) |
|
This increase was driven by an increase in the cost of parts used to repair higher-priced
technology (flat-panel televisions, etc.). |
- 12 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
Interest income and fees |
|
$ |
135,828 |
|
|
$ |
132,270 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
16,437 |
|
|
|
20,061 |
|
|
|
(3,624 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
|
|
(75.4 |
) |
Finance charges and other |
|
$ |
152,797 |
|
|
$ |
154,492 |
|
|
|
(1,695 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Interest income and fees and insurance commissions are included in Finance charges and
other for the credit segment, while Other income is included in Finance charges and other for the
retail segment. |
The increase in Interest income and fees of the credit segment resulted primarily from a
6.8% increase in the average balance of customer accounts receivable outstanding for fiscal year
2010, partially offset by a decline in the average interest income and fee yield from 19.0% for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 to 18.3% for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010. The
interest income and fee yield dropped as a result of the higher level of charge-offs experienced
during the fiscal 2010 period.
Insurance commissions of the credit segment have declined due to lower front-end commissions
as a result of the decline in sales, lower retrospective commissions, which were negatively
impacted by higher claims filings due to Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, and lower interest earnings on
funds held by the insurance company for the payment of claims.
Other income of the retail segment declined primarily due to lower retrospective commissions
on our repair service agreements which were negatively impacted by higher repair and exchange
claims experience.
The following table provides key portfolio performance information for the year ended January
31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest income and fees (a) |
|
$ |
135,828 |
|
|
$ |
132,270 |
|
Net charge-offs (b) |
|
|
(28,942 |
) |
|
|
(22,362 |
) |
Borrowing costs (c) |
|
|
(20,666 |
) |
|
|
(24,072 |
) |
|
|
|
Net portfolio yield |
|
$ |
86,220 |
|
|
|
85,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average portfolio balance |
|
$ |
743,756 |
|
|
$ |
696,202 |
|
Portfolio yield % |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
Net charge-off % |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in Finance charges and other. |
|
(b) |
|
Included in Provision for bad debts. |
|
(c) |
|
Included in Interest expense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
534.3 |
|
|
$ |
580.4 |
|
|
|
(46.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
Product gross margin percentage |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
The product gross margin percentage decreased from the 2009 period to the 2010 period due
to a highly competitive retail environment driven by increased competition for market share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
Cost of service parts sold |
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
As a percent of service revenues |
|
|
47.1 |
% |
|
|
45.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
This increase was due primarily to a 15.9% increase in parts sales. Parts sales also
increased as a percentage of service revenues from 35.5% in the 2009 period to 39.3% in the 2010
period.
- 13 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense Retail |
|
$ |
193.2 |
|
|
$ |
193.9 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expense Credit |
|
|
62.7 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense Total |
|
$ |
255.9 |
|
|
$ |
254.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
As a percent of total revenues |
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
The increase in SG&A expense was largely attributable to a $4.9 million increase in our
litigation reserves to reflect the amount that was required to settle the outstanding Texas
Attorney General litigation, the addition of new stores since February 1, 2008, and related
increases in employee and employee-related expenses, partially offset by $1.3 million of expenses,
net of insurance proceeds, incurred related to the hurricanes in the prior year, and lower
advertising, postage, utilities, telephone and fuel expenses in the fiscal year ended January 31,
2010. Additionally, as a result of the decreased product sales volume in the current year, sales
compensation as a percentage of revenues increased as reduced commissions were more than offset by
minimum wage payment requirements. SG&A expense increased as a percent of revenues due to the
general de-leveraging effect of the decline in same store sales.
Significant SG&A expense increases and decreases related to specific business segments
included the following:
Retail Segment
The following are the significant factors affecting the retail segment:
|
|
|
There was an increase in litigation reserves of $4.9 million for the settlement of the
Texas Attorney General litigation. |
|
|
|
|
Net advertising expense decreased by approximately $4.3 million from the 2009 period. |
|
|
|
|
Total compensation costs and related expenses decreased approximately $3.1 million from
the 2009 period, primarily due to the reduced sales volume. |
|
|
|
|
Total occupancy expenses increased approximately $1.8 million, primarily as a result of
the stores opened during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Bank and credit card fees increased by approximately $1.5 million from the 2009 period,
primarily due to the use of the third-party finance providers for certain of our
interest-free programs. |
|
|
|
|
The reimbursement received from the credit segment increased approximately $1.2 million
due to the growth in the credit portfolio. |
Credit Segment
The following are the significant factors affecting the credit segment:
|
|
|
Total compensation costs and related expenses increased approximately $2.4 million from
the 2009 period as staffing was increased to address increased levels of delinquencies in
the challenging economic environment. |
|
|
|
|
The reimbursement of SG&A expenses to the retail segment increased approximately $1.2
million due to growth in the credit portfolio. |
- 14 -
|
|
|
Amortization expense increased approximately $0.4 million from the 2009 period due to
entering into our $210 million revolving credit facility in August of fiscal 2009. |
|
|
|
Corporate overhead expenses allocated decreased approximately $2.2 million, primarily
due to the reduction of expenses related to the hurricanes which occurred in the prior year
and a reduced bonus payout. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Goodwill impairment |
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
During the three months ended October 31, 2009, we determined, as a result of the
sustained decline in our market capitalization and the current challenging economic environment and
its impact on our comparable store sales, credit portfolio performance and operating results, that
an interim goodwill impairment test was necessary. We concluded from our analysis that our goodwill
was impaired and recorded a $9.6 million charge to write-off the carrying amount of our goodwill.
Since our goodwill was attributable to our acquisition of credit insurance operations and a portion
of the credit portfolio, the impairment charge is reflected in our credit segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Provision for bad debts |
|
$ |
36.8 |
|
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
As a percent of total revenues |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
The provision for bad debts is primarily related to our credit segment, with
approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, included in the results of operations for the retail segment.
The provision for bad debts on Other receivables and Customer receivables increased primarily
as a result of the increase in actual and expected net credit charge-offs on customer receivables.
Actual net charge-offs increased approximately $6.6 million, or 29.4%, in fiscal 2010, compared to
fiscal 2009. As a result of credit portfolio performance and expectations about future net
charge-offs, the bad debt and uncollectible interest reserves for receivables were increased, as a
percent of the customer receivable balance, to 5.0% at January 31, 2010, from 3.6% at January 31,
2009. See Business Finance operations Credit quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
All of our interest expense, net, is included in the results of operations for the credit
segment.
The decrease in net interest expense was driven by a decrease in outstanding debt balances
during the year ended January 31, 2010, as compared to the prior fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
(82.6 |
) |
As a percent of income before income taxes |
|
|
51.2 |
% |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
The effective tax rate was higher during the 2010 period because taxes for the State of
Texas are based on gross margin and are not affected by changes in income before income taxes.
- 15 -
Year ended January 31, 2008 compared to the year ended January 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Net sales |
|
$ |
805.1 |
|
|
$ |
731.0 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
154.4 |
|
|
|
139.5 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
959.5 |
|
|
$ |
870.5 |
|
|
$ |
89.0 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
The $74.1 million increase in net sales was made up of the following:
|
|
|
a $13.9 million increase resulted from a same store sales increase of 2.0%, |
|
|
|
a $60.6 million increase generated by 14 retail locations that were not open for twelve
consecutive months in both periods, |
|
|
|
a $1.5 million increase resulted from a decrease in discounts on promotional credit
sales, and |
|
|
|
a $1.9 million decrease resulted from a decrease in service revenues. |
The components of the $74.1 million increase in net sales were a $72.2 million increase in
product sales and a $1.9 million net increase in repair service agreement commissions and service
revenues. The $72.2 million increase in product sales resulted from the following:
|
|
|
approximately $42.3 million increase attributable to an overall increase in the average
unit price. The increase was due primarily to a change in the mix of product sales, driven
by an increase in the consumer electronics category, which has the highest average price
point of any category, as a percentage of total product sales. Additionally, there were
category price point increases as a result of a shift to higher-priced high-efficiency
laundry items and increases in price points on furniture and mattresses, partially offset
by a decline in the average price points on lawn and garden, and |
|
|
|
approximately $29.9 million was attributable to increases in unit sales, due primarily
to increased consumer electronics (especially flat-panel televisions), track and lawn and
garden sales, partially offset by a decline in appliance sales. The increase in unit sales
reflects the incremental net sales generated by our 14 opened retail locations offset by a
unit decline in other retail locations. |
The $1.9 million increase in repair service agreement commissions and service revenues
consisted of:
|
|
|
a $6.1 million increase in the repair service agreement commissions of the retail
segment due primarily to the increase in product sales; |
|
|
|
a $2.3 million decrease in the repair service agreement commissions of the credit
segment due to the higher level of charge-offs experienced; and |
|
|
|
a $1.9 million decrease in the service revenues of the retail segment due primarily to
lower service labor revenues. |
- 16 -
The following table presents the makeup of net sales by product category in each period,
including repair service agreement commissions and service revenues, expressed both in dollar
amounts and as a percent of total net sales. Classification of sales has been adjusted from
previous filings to ensure comparability between the categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Category (Dollars in Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Change |
|
Consumer electronics |
|
$ |
305,056 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
$ |
244,872 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
|
24.6 |
%(1) |
Home appliances |
|
|
221,474 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
223,877 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) (2) |
Track |
|
|
109,799 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
101,289 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
(3) |
Furniture and mattresses |
|
|
68,869 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
62,797 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
(4) |
Other |
|
|
38,531 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
38,736 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product sales |
|
|
743,729 |
|
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
671,571 |
|
|
|
91.9 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) |
|
|
40,199 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
36,424 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
(5) |
Service revenues |
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
805,049 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
730,992 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This increase is due to continued consumer interest in LCD televisions, which offset declines
in projection and plasma televisions. |
|
(2) |
|
The home appliance category declined as increased laundry and air conditioning sales were
offset by lower refrigeration and cooking sales, as the appliance market in general showed
continued weakness. |
|
(3) |
|
The increase in track sales (consisting largely of computers, computer peripherals, video game
equipment, portable electronics and small appliances) is driven primarily by increased video game
equipment, Blu-ray player, laptop computer and GPS device sales, partially offset by declines in
camcorder, camera, MP3 player and desktop computer sales. |
|
(4) |
|
This increase is due to store expansion and a change in our furniture and mattresses
merchandising driven by the multi-vendor strategy implemented during the prior year. |
|
(5) |
|
This increase is due to the increase in product sales. |
|
(6) |
|
This decrease is driven by a decrease in the number of warranty service calls performed by our
technicians. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Interest income and fees |
|
$ |
132,270 |
|
|
$ |
117,186 |
|
|
$ |
15,084 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
20,061 |
|
|
|
21,402 |
|
|
|
(1,341 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
127.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
$ |
154,492 |
|
|
|
139,538 |
|
|
$ |
14,954 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Note: Interest income and fees and insurance commissions are included in the Finance charges
and other for the credit segment, while Other income is included in Finance charges and other for
the retail segment.
The increase in Interest income and fees of the credit segment resulted primarily from a
14.8% increase in the average balance of customer accounts receivable outstanding for fiscal year
2009 as compared to 2008.
Insurance commissions of the credit segment have declined due to lower retrospective
commissions, which were negatively impacted by higher claims filings due to Hurricanes Gustav and
Ike, and lower interest earnings on funds held by the insurance company for the payment of claims.
Other income of the retail segment increased primarily due to increased retrospective
commissions in our repair service agreement program.
- 17 -
The following table provides key portfolio performance information for the year ended January
31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest income and fees (a) |
|
$ |
132,270 |
|
|
$ |
117,186 |
|
Net charge-offs (b) |
|
|
(22,362 |
) |
|
|
(17,418 |
) |
Borrowing costs (c) |
|
|
(24,072 |
) |
|
|
(25,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net portfolio yield |
|
$ |
85,836 |
|
|
$ |
73,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average portfolio balance |
|
$ |
696,202 |
|
|
$ |
606,631 |
|
Portfolio yield % |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
Net charge-off % |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in Finance charges and other. |
|
(b) |
|
Included in Provision for bad debts. |
|
(c) |
|
Included in Interest expense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
580.4 |
|
|
$ |
508.8 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Product gross margin percentage |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
The product gross margin percentage decreased from the 2008 period to the 2009 period due
to pricing pressures in retailing in general, and specifically in consumer electronics and
appliances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Cost of service parts sold |
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
As a percentage of service revenues |
|
|
45.5 |
% |
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
This increase was due primarily to a 22.8% increase in parts sales, which grew faster
than labor sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Selling, general and administrative expense Retail |
|
$ |
193.9 |
|
|
$ |
190.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense Credit |
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense Total |
|
$ |
254.2 |
|
|
$ |
245.8 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
As a percentage of total revenues |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
The increase in SG&A expense was largely attributable to the addition of new stores and
expenses of approximately $1.4 million, net of estimated insurance proceeds, that we incurred
related to the two hurricanes that occurred during the year. The improvement in our SG&A expense as
a percent of revenues was largely driven by lower compensation costs in absolute dollars and as a
percent of revenues as compared to the prior year, as well as reduced advertising expense as a
percent of revenues. Additionally, reductions in certain store operating expenses, including
repairs and maintenance and janitorial services contributed to the improvement. Partially
offsetting these improvements were increases in utility, credit data processing and stock-based
compensation expenses.
Significant SG&A expense increases and decreases related to specific business segments
included the following:
- 18 -
Retail Segment
The following are the significant factors affecting the retail segment:
|
|
|
Total occupancy expenses increased approximately $2.6 million primarily due to the
opening of new stores. |
|
|
|
There was an increase of approximately $0.7 million, net of estimated insurance
proceeds, incurred related to the two hurricanes that occurred during the fiscal 2009
period. |
|
|
|
Contract delivery and installation costs increased approximately $2.2 million from the
2008 period primarily driven by increased use of third-parties to provide the service and
increased product sales. |
|
|
|
Net advertising expense increased by approximately $0.8 million, but declined as a
percent of revenues. |
|
|
|
Total compensation costs and related expenses decreased approximately $1.8 million from
the fiscal 2008 period. |
|
|
|
The reimbursement received from the credit segment increased approximately $2.2 million
due to the growth in the credit portfolio. |
Credit Segment
The following are the significant factors affecting the credit segment:
|
|
|
The reimbursement of SG&A expenses to the retail segment increased approximately $2.2
million due to growth in the credit portfolio. |
|
|
|
Credit data processing expense increased approximately $1.2 million from the 2008
period, primarily due to the use of a new virtual messaging service beginning in fiscal
2009 and growth in the credit portfolio. |
|
|
|
Forms printing and related postage expense increased approximately $0.8 million from the
2008 period, primarily due to increased collection activity driven by the increase in
portfolio balance. |
|
|
|
Amortization expense increased approximately $0.5 million from the 2008 period due to
costs associated with the addition of our asset-based revolving credit facility. |
|
|
|
Professional fees and legal expenses increased approximately $0.4 million from the 2008
period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Provision for bad debts- |
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
As a percentage of total revenues |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
The provision for bad debts is primarily related to our credit segment, with
approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, included in the results of operations for the retail segment.
The provision for bad debts on Other receivables and Customer receivables increased primarily
as a result of the growth in the customer receivables portfolio and an increase in actual and
expected net charge-offs. Actual net charge-offs of Customer receivables increased approximately
$4.9 million in fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008. The allowance for bad debts increased
approximately $3.8 million as a result of the growth in the customer receivables portfolio and our
expectations about credit portfolio performance. See the notes to the financial statements for
information regarding the performance of the credit portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
All of our interest expense, net, is included in the results of operations for the credit
segment, as all of our interest expense is attributable to debt incurred to finance customer
receivables.
- 19 -
The decrease in net interest expense was a result of lower interest rates incurred on the debt
outstanding, partially offset by higher average balances being outstanding during the 2009 fiscal
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Other
(income) expense, net |
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
(943 |
) |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
(112.4 |
) |
We realized gains on sales of property in the year ended January 31, 2008. Additionally,
during the year ended January 31, 2008, there were approximately $1.2 million of gains realized,
but not recognized, on transactions qualifying for sale-leaseback accounting that were deferred and
are being amortized as a reduction of rent expense on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease
terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Change |
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
As a percent of income before income taxes |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
The effective tax rate was higher during the 2009 period because taxes for the State of
Texas are based on gross margin and are not affected by changes in income before income taxes. The
fiscal 2008 effective tax rate was reduced by the reversal of previously accrued Texas margin tax
as a result of a legal entity reorganization completed during that year.
Impact of inflation and changing prices
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our net sales or results of
operations. However, price deflation, primarily in consumer electronics has impacted our net sales
and results of operations. A significant increase in oil and gasoline prices could adversely affect
our customers shopping decisions and patterns. We rely heavily on our internal distribution system
and our next day delivery policy to satisfy our customers needs and desires, and any such
significant increases could result in increased distribution charges. Such increases may not affect
our competitors in the same manner as it affects us.
Seasonality and quarterly results of operations
Our business is somewhat seasonal, with a higher portion of sales and operating profit
realized during the quarter that ends January 31, due primarily to the holiday selling season. In
addition, historically our results of operations and portfolio performance for our first fiscal
quarter are stronger than for our second fiscal quarter. Over the four quarters of fiscal 2010,
gross margins were 38.1%, 37.7%, 37.4% and 37.9%. During the same period, operating margins were
9.6%, 6.0%, -6.6% and 2.2%. Our quarterly results may fluctuate materially depending on factors
such as the following:
|
|
|
timing of new product introductions, new store openings and store relocations; |
|
|
|
sales contributed by new stores; |
|
|
|
increases or decreases in comparable store sales; |
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions; |
|
|
|
shifts in the timing of certain holidays or promotions; |
|
|
|
one-time charges incurred, such as goodwill impairment and litigation reserves
incurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2010; and |
|
|
|
changes in our merchandise mix. |
Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for
a full year.
The following tables set forth certain unaudited quarterly statement of operations information
for the eight quarters ended January 31, 2010. The unaudited quarterly information has been
prepared on a consistent basis, includes all normal recurring adjustments that management considers
necessary for a fair presentation of the information shown and includes the effects of the
retrospective application of our
- 20 -
change in our method of accounting for our interest in our variable interest entity effective
February 1, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
Apr. 30 |
|
|
Jul. 31 |
|
|
Oct. 31 |
|
|
Jan. 31 |
|
|
|
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
184,817 |
|
|
$ |
175,389 |
|
|
$ |
148,463 |
|
|
$ |
158,732 |
|
Repair service agreement commissions (net) |
|
|
9,790 |
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
7,320 |
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
5,599 |
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
200,151 |
|
|
|
190,299 |
|
|
|
161,382 |
|
|
|
170,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
39,700 |
|
|
|
40,128 |
|
|
|
36,116 |
|
|
|
36,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
239,851 |
|
|
|
230,427 |
|
|
|
197,498 |
|
|
|
207,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of annual revenues |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
145,870 |
|
|
|
140,761 |
|
|
|
120,963 |
|
|
|
126,705 |
|
Cost of
service parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
|
2,345 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
62,738 |
|
|
|
64,979 |
|
|
|
65,661 |
|
|
|
62,564 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
5,644 |
|
|
|
8,026 |
|
|
|
12,651 |
|
|
|
10,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
216,839 |
|
|
|
216,563 |
|
|
|
211,564 |
|
|
|
202,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
23,012 |
|
|
|
13,864 |
|
|
|
(14,066 |
) |
|
|
5,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) as a % total revenues |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
(7.1 |
)% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
5,341 |
|
|
|
5,295 |
|
|
|
4,931 |
|
Other income |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
18,016 |
|
|
|
8,536 |
|
|
|
(19,328 |
) |
|
|
811 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
6,660 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
(4,955 |
) |
|
|
(906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
11,356 |
|
|
$ |
5,224 |
|
|
$ |
(14,373 |
) |
|
$ |
1,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as a % of revenue |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
22,447 |
|
|
|
22,454 |
|
|
|
22,459 |
|
|
|
22,466 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
22,689 |
|
|
|
22,660 |
|
|
|
22,459 |
|
|
|
22,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
Apr. 30 |
|
|
Jul. 31 |
|
|
Oct. 31 |
|
|
Jan. 31 |
|
|
|
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
179,911 |
|
|
$ |
175,240 |
|
|
$ |
160,253 |
|
|
$ |
228,325 |
|
Repair service agreement commissions (net) |
|
|
9,970 |
|
|
|
9,911 |
|
|
|
8,547 |
|
|
|
11,771 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
|
|
5,129 |
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
195,073 |
|
|
|
190,639 |
|
|
|
173,929 |
|
|
|
245,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
37,044 |
|
|
|
38,838 |
|
|
|
37,863 |
|
|
|
40,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
232,117 |
|
|
|
229,477 |
|
|
|
211,792 |
|
|
|
286,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of annual revenues |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
139,058 |
|
|
|
136,787 |
|
|
|
127,007 |
|
|
|
177,571 |
|
Cost of
service parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
60,436 |
|
|
|
62,968 |
|
|
|
62,472 |
|
|
|
68,296 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
6,860 |
|
|
|
6,226 |
|
|
|
7,193 |
|
|
|
7,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
208,684 |
|
|
|
208,245 |
|
|
|
199,151 |
|
|
|
256,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 21 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009 |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
Apr. 30 |
|
|
Jul. 31 |
|
|
Oct. 31 |
|
|
Jan. 31 |
|
|
|
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
23,433 |
|
|
|
21,232 |
|
|
|
12,641 |
|
|
|
30,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit as a % total revenues |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
5,486 |
|
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
6,783 |
|
|
|
6,198 |
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
17,969 |
|
|
|
15,974 |
|
|
|
5,862 |
|
|
|
23,837 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,472 |
|
|
|
5,918 |
|
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
8,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,497 |
|
|
$ |
10,056 |
|
|
$ |
3,434 |
|
|
$ |
15,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as a % of revenue |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
22,382 |
|
|
|
22,407 |
|
|
|
22,422 |
|
|
|
22,439 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
22,560 |
|
|
|
22,620 |
|
|
|
22,632 |
|
|
|
22,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Liquidity and capital resources
Current activities.
We require capital to finance our growth as we add new stores and markets to our operations,
which in turn requires additional working capital for increased customer receivables and inventory.
We have historically financed our operations through a combination of cash flow generated from
earnings and external borrowings, including primarily bank debt, extended terms provided by our
vendors for inventory purchases, acquisition of inventory under consignment arrangements and
transfers of customer receivables to our asset-backed securitization facilities.
Since we extend credit in connection with a large portion of our retail, repair service
agreement and credit insurance sales, we have entered into an asset-based revolving credit
facility, obtained a $10 million unsecured bank line of credit and created a securitization program
to fund the customer receivables generated by the extension of credit. In order to fund the
purchases of eligible customer receivables from us under the securitization program, we have issued
medium-term and variable funding notes through our variable interest entity, or VIE, secured by the
receivables to third parties to obtain cash for these purchases under the securitization program.
Asset based lending facility.
Our $210 million asset-based revolving credit facility provides funding based on a borrowing
base calculation that includes accounts customer receivable and inventory and matures in August
2011. Our revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 325 basis
points to 375 basis points, based on a fixed charge coverage ratio. In addition to the fixed charge
coverage ratio, our revolving credit facility includes a total liabilities to tangible net worth
ratio requirement, a minimum customer receivables cash recovery percentage requirement, a net
capital expenditures limit and combined portfolio performance covenants. Additionally, our
revolving credit facility contains cross-default provisions, such that, any default under another
of our credit facilities or our VIEs securitization facilities would result in a default under our
revolving credit facility, and any default under our revolving credit facility would result in a
default under those agreements. We expect, based on current facts and circumstances, that we will
be in compliance with the above covenants through fiscal 2011.
At January 31, 2010, we had additional capacity of $34.1 million under our revolving credit
facility and $10 million under an unsecured bank line of credit immediately available to us for
general corporate purposes. In addition to the $34.1 million currently available under the
revolving credit facility, an additional $46.7 million may become available under the borrowing
base calculation as we grow the balance of eligible customer receivables retained by us and when
there is growth in total eligible inventory balances. Recent credit portfolio performance resulted
in a reduction in availability under the revolving credit facility of approximately $6.0 million at
January 31, 2010. This amount may become available in the
- 22 -
future if customer credit portfolio performance improves, however, a further decline in credit
performance could lead to further reductions in availability. The principal payments received on
customer receivables, which averaged approximately $35 million per month during the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2010, will also be available each month to fund new customer receivables
generated. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit
facility at January 31, 2010 was 3.3%, including the interest expense associated with our interest
rate swaps. We expect that our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, including those for
our capital expenditure requirements, will be met with our available lines of credit, together with
cash generated from operations. While we have no new stores currently under development for fiscal
2011, our long-term plans are to grow our store base by approximately 10% a year, dependent upon
future capital availability. We expect we will invest in inventory, real estate and customer
receivables to support the additional stores and same store sales growth. Depending on market
conditions and our liquidity needs we may, at times, slow or suspend our new store growth plans,
enter into sale-leaseback transactions to finance our real estate or seek alternative financing
sources for new store expansions and customer receivables growth, including expansion of existing
lines of credit, and accessing new debt or equity markets.
A summary of the significant financial covenants that govern our revolving credit facility
compared to our actual compliance status at January 31, 2010, as amended, is presented below. These
covenants were amended in February 2010 as discussed below, and the amendment required the
covenants to be calculated on a consolidated basis to reflect the impact of inclusion of the
securitization program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required Minimum/ |
|
|
Actual |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
Fixed charge coverage ratio must exceed required minimum (1) |
|
|
1.24 to 1.00 |
|
|
|
1.10 to 1.00 |
|
Total liabilities to tangible net worth ratio must be lower
than the required maximum (1) |
|
|
1.61 to 1.00 |
|
|
|
2.00 to 1.00 |
|
Cash recovery percentage must exceed required minimum (1) |
|
|
5.00% |
|
|
|
4.75% |
|
Capital expenditures, net must be lower than the required
maximum |
|
|
$10.1 million |
|
|
|
$22.0 million |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These covenants are also covenants of our existing asset-backed securitization facility. |
|
|
|
Note: |
|
All terms in the above table are defined by our revolving credit facility and may or may
not agree directly to the financial statement captions in this document. The covenants are
calculated on a trailing four quarter basis, except for the Cash recovery percentage, which is
calculated on a trailing three month basis. |
As we have done in the past, we will adjust the volume of new customer receivables
transferred to the securitization program to allow it to use the proceeds of principal repayments
from its customer accounts receivable portfolio to reduce the balance outstanding under its
revolving credit facility prior to the commitment reduction date. As of January 31, 2010, the
balance under the securitization programs revolving credit facility was $200.0 million. Events of
default under our revolving credit facility include, but are not limited to, subject to grace
periods and notice provisions in certain circumstances, non-payment of principal, interest or fees;
violation of covenants; material inaccuracy of any representation or warranty; default under or
acceleration of certain other indebtedness; bankruptcy and insolvency events; certain judgments and
other liabilities; certain environmental claims; and a change of control. If an event of default
occurs, the lenders under the credit facility are entitled to take various actions, including
accelerating amounts due under the credit facility and requiring that all such amounts be
immediately paid in full. Any repayment requirement or acceleration of amounts owed could have a
material adverse affect on our business operations. Our obligations under our revolving credit
facility are secured by all of our and our subsidiaries assets, excluding customer receivables
transferred to the securitization program and certain inventory subject to vendor floor plan
arrangements.
Asset-backed securitization facility.
During the twelve months ended January 31, 2010, our VIE reduced its receivable portfolio by
$123.8 million and paid off $96.1 million in outstanding borrowings, while we borrowed $42.6
million to
- 23 -
finance a $106.3 million increase in customer receivables on balance sheet. As a result, the
combined borrowings of us and our VIE declined $53.5 million.
Under our asset-backed securitization facility, the VIE is subject to certain affirmative and
negative covenants contained in the transaction documents governing the 2002 Series A variable
funding note and 2006 Series A bonds, including covenants that restrict, subject to specified
exceptions: the incurrence of non-permitted indebtedness and other obligations and the granting of
additional liens; mergers, acquisitions, investments and disposition of assets; maintenance of a
minimum net worth by the VIE; and the use of proceeds of the program. The VIE also makes
representations and warranties relating to compliance with certain laws, payment of taxes,
maintenance of its separate legal entity, preservation of its existence, and protection of
collateral and financial reporting.
A summary of the significant financial covenants that govern the 2002 Series A variable
funding note compared to actual compliance status at January 31, 2010, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum/ |
|
|
As reported |
|
Maximum |
VIE interest must exceed required minimum
|
|
|
$93.2 million
|
|
|
$84.8 million
|
Gross loss rate must be lower than required maximum (a)
|
|
|
6.1% |
|
|
|
10.0% |
|
Serviced portfolio gross loss rate must be lower than required maximum (b)
|
|
|
5.2% |
|
|
|
10.0% |
|
Net portfolio yield must exceed required minimum (a)
|
|
|
5.8% |
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
Serviced portfolio net portfolio yield must exceed required minimum (b)
|
|
|
8.0% |
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
Payment rate must exceed required minimum (a)
|
|
|
6.3% |
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
Serviced portfolio payment rate must exceed required minimum (a)
|
|
|
5.00% |
|
|
4.75% |
Consolidated net worth must exceed required minimum
|
|
|
$345.4 million
|
|
|
$246.6 million
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated for those customer receivables transferred to our existing securitization
program. |
|
(b) |
|
Calculated for the total of customer receivables transferred to our existing
securitization program and those retained by us. |
|
|
|
Note: |
|
All terms in the above table are defined by our existing securitization program and may or
may not agree directly to the financial statement captions in this document. |
The various same as cash and deferred interest credit programs we offer are eligible
for securitization up to the limits provided for in our securitization agreements. This limit is
currently 30.0% of eligible securitized customer receivables. If we exceed this 30.0% limit, we
would be required to use some of our other capital resources to carry the unfunded balances of the
customer receivables for the promotional period. The percentage of eligible securitized customer
receivables represented by promotional customer receivables was 17.3% and 13.0%, as of January 31,
2009, and 2010, respectively. There is no limitation on the amount of same as cash or deferred
interest program accounts that can be carried as collateral under our revolving credit facility.
The percentage of all managed customer receivables represented by promotional customer receivables
was 15.3% as of January 31, 2010, as compared to 16.4% at January 31, 2009.
We expect, based on current facts and circumstances, that we will be in compliance with the
above covenants through fiscal 2011. Events of default under the 2002 Series A variable funding
note and the 2006 Series A bonds, subject to grace periods and notice provisions in some
circumstances, include, among others: failure of the VIE to pay principal, interest or fees;
violation by the VIE of any of its covenants or agreements; inaccuracy of any representation or
warranty made by the VIE; certain servicer defaults; failure of the trustee to have a valid and
perfected first priority security interest in the collateral; default under or acceleration of
certain other indebtedness; bankruptcy and insolvency events; failure to maintain certain loss
ratios and portfolio yield; change of control provisions and certain other events pertaining to us.
The VIEs obligations under the program are secured by the customer receivables and proceeds.
As a result of the declines in our profitability beginning in the quarter ended October 31,
2009, due to the slowdown in the economic conditions in our markets, we determined that there was a
reasonable likelihood that we would trigger the default provisions of our credit facilities. Based
on that expectation, we began working with our revolving credit facility lenders and VIE
noteholders to amend the covenants in our revolving credit facility and our securitization
facilities. We completed the necessary amendments in March 2010, which resulted in the following
changes:
- 24 -
|
|
|
Fixed charge coverage ratio requirement for our revolving credit facility and our
securitization facilities were reduced to 1.1 to 1.0 for the twelve month periods
ended January 31, 2010, and April 30, 2010, before returning to a requirement of 1.3
to 1.0 beginning with the quarter ending July 31, 2010, |
|
|
|
|
The leverage ratio for our revolving credit facility and our securitization
facilities was replaced with a maximum total liabilities to tangible net worth
requirement, beginning as of January 31, 2010 with a required maximum of 2.00 to 1.00
at January 31, 2010, declining to 1.75 to 1.00 as of July 31, 2010 and then to 1.50 to
1.00 as of April 30, 2011 and each fiscal quarter thereafter, |
|
|
|
|
The interest rate on our revolving credit facility increased by 100 basis points to
LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 325 basis points to 375 basis points, |
|
|
|
|
We will be required to pay a fee, as servicer of the customer receivables
transferred to the securitization program, equal to the following rates multiplied
times the total available borrowing commitment under the securitization programs
revolving credit facility on the dates shown: |
|
o |
|
50 basis points on May 1, 2010, |
|
|
o |
|
100 basis points on August 1, 2010, |
|
|
o |
|
110 basis points on November 1, 2010, |
|
|
o |
|
115 basis points on February 1, 2011, |
|
|
o |
|
115 basis point on May 1, 2011, and |
|
|
o |
|
123 basis points on August 1, 2011, |
|
|
|
The total available commitments under the securitization programs revolving credit
facility will be reduced from the current level of $200 million to $170 million in
April 2010 and then to $130 million in April 2011, |
|
|
|
|
We will use the proceeds from any capital raising activity to further reduce the
commitments and debt outstanding under the securitization programs debt facilities, |
|
|
|
|
The maturity date on the securitization programs variable funding note was reduced
from September 2012 to August 2011, and |
|
|
|
|
We may be required to complete certain additional tasks as servicer of the customer
receivables transferred to the securitization program, so long as commitments remain
outstanding under the securitization programs revolving credit facility. |
There are two series of notes and bonds outstanding under our securitization program. The 2002
Series A program functions as a revolving credit facility to fund the transfer of eligible customer
receivables. When the facility approaches a predetermined amount, the VIE is required to seek
financing to pay down the outstanding balance in the 2002 Series A variable funding note. The
amount paid down on the facility then becomes available to fund the transfer of new customer
receivables or to meet required principal payments on other series as they become due. The new
financing could be in the form of additional notes, bonds or other instruments as the market and
transaction documents might allow. Given the current state of the financial markets, especially
with respect to asset-backed securitization financing, we have been unable to issue medium-term
notes or increase the availability under the existing variable funding note program. The 2002
Series A program is renewable annually, at our option, until August 2011 and bears interest at
commercial paper rates plus a spread of 250 basis points. The total commitment under the 2002
Series A program was reduced from $200 million to $170 million in April 2010. Additionally, in
connection with recent amendments to the 2002 Series A facility, we agreed to reduce the total
available commitment to $130 million in April 2011. The weighted average interest on the variable
funding note during the month of January 2010 was 2.8%. The 2006 Series A program, which was
consummated in August 2006, is non-amortizing for the first four years and officially matures in
April 2017. However, it is expected that the scheduled $7.5 million principal payments, which begin
in September 2010, will retire the bonds prior to that date. Private institutional investors,
primarily insurance companies, purchased the 2006 Series A bonds at a weighted fixed rate of 5.75%.
The securitization borrowing agreements contain certain covenants requiring the maintenance of
various financial ratios and customer receivables performance standards. If the three-month average
net portfolio yield, as defined by agreements, falls below 5.0%, then the VIE may be required to
fund additions to the cash reserves in the restricted cash accounts. The three-month average net
portfolio yield was 5.8% at January 31, 2010. The investors and the securitization trustee have no
recourse to our other assets for failure of our or the VIEs individual customers to pay when due.
If the VIE is unable to repay the 2002 Series A note and 2006
- 25 -
Series A bonds due to its inability to collect the transferred customer accounts, the VIE could not
pay the subordinated notes it has issued to us in partial payment for transferred customer
accounts, and the 2006 Series A bond holders could claim the balance in its $6.0 million restricted
cash account. We are responsible under a $20.0 million letter of credit that secures the
performance of our obligations or services under the servicing agreement as it relates to the
transferred assets that are part of the asset-backed securitization facility.
Securitization Facilities
We finance a portion of our customer receivables through asset-backed securitization facilities
We continue to service the transferred accounts for the VIE, and we receive a monthly
servicing fee, so long as we act as servicer, in an amount equal to .25% multiplied by the average
aggregate principal amount of customer receivables serviced, including the amount of average
aggregate defaulted customer receivables. The VIE records revenues equal to the interest charged
to the customer on the receivables less losses, the cost of funds, the program administration fees
paid in connection with either the 2002 Series A or 2006 Series A bond holders, the servicing fee
and additional earnings to the extent they are available.
We will continue to finance our operations and future growth through a combination of cash
flow generated from operations and external borrowings, including primarily bank debt, extended
vendor terms for purchases of inventory, acquisition of inventory under consignment arrangements,
and the asset-backed securitization facilities. Based on our current operating plans, we believe
that cash generated from operations, available borrowings under our revolving credit facility and
unsecured credit line, extended vendor terms for purchases of inventory, acquisition of inventory
under consignment arrangements and cash flows from the asset-backed securitization program will be
sufficient to fund our operations for at least twelve months, subject to continued compliance with
the covenants in the credit facilities. If there is a default under any of the facilities that is
not waived by the various lenders, it could result in the requirement to immediately begin
repayment of all amounts owed under our credit facilities, as all of the facilities have
cross-default provisions that would result in default under all of the facilities if there is a
default under any one of the facilities. If the repayment of amounts owed under our credit
facilities is accelerated, we may not have sufficient cash and liquid assets at such time to be
able to immediately repay all the amounts owed under the facilities.
Both the revolving credit facility and the asset-backed securitization program are significant
factors relative to our ongoing liquidity and our ability to meet the cash needs associated with
the growth of our business. Our inability to use either of these programs because of a failure to
comply with their covenants would adversely affect our business operations. Funding of current and
future customer receivables under the borrowing facilities can be adversely affected if we exceed
certain predetermined levels of re-aged customer receivables, size of the secondary portfolio, the
amount of promotional customer receivables, write-offs, bankruptcies or other ineligible customer
receivable amounts.
- 26 -
There are several factors that could decrease cash availability, including:
|
|
|
reduced demand or margins for our products; |
|
|
|
|
more stringent vendor terms on our inventory purchases; |
|
|
|
|
loss of ability to acquire inventory on consignment; |
|
|
|
|
increases in product cost that we may not be able to pass on to our customers; |
|
|
|
|
reductions in product pricing due to competitor promotional activities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in inventory requirements based on longer delivery times of the manufacturers
or other requirements which would negatively impact our delivery and distribution
capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
an acceleration of the growth of the credit portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
increases in the retained portion of our customer receivables portfolio under our
current asset-backed securitization program as a result of changes in performance or
types of receivables transferred (promotional versus non-promotional and primary versus
secondary portfolio), or as a result of a change in the mix of funding sources available
under the asset-backed securitization program, requiring higher collateral levels, or
limitations on our ability to obtain financing through commercial paper-based funding
sources; |
|
|
|
|
reduced availability under our revolving credit facility as a result of borrowing
base requirements and the impact on the borrowing base calculation of changes in the
performance or eligibility of the customer receivables financed by that facility; |
|
|
|
|
reduced availability under our revolving credit facility or asset-backed
securitization facilities as a result of non-compliance with the covenant requirements; |
|
|
|
|
reduced availability under our revolving credit facility or asset-backed
securitization facilities as a result of the inability of any of the financial
institutions providing those facilities to fund their commitment, |
|
|
|
|
reductions in the capacity or inability to expand the capacity available for
financing our customer receivables portfolio under existing or replacement asset-backed
securitization programs or a requirement that we retain a higher percentage of the
credit portfolio under such programs; |
|
|
|
|
increases in borrowing costs (interest and administrative fees relative to our
customer receivables portfolio associated with the funding of our customer receivables); |
|
|
|
|
increases in personnel costs or other costs for us to stay competitive in our
markets; and |
|
|
|
|
inability to renew or replace all or a portion of our current credit facilities at
their annual maturity dates (our asset-based revolving credit facility and the revolving
facility of our securitization program mature in August 2011, and the medium term notes
issued under the securitization program begin repayment in September 2010 and we expect
them to be fully repaid by April 2012). |
We are discussing various options to renew or replace our existing credit facilities,
including exploring opportunities to raise capital in the various debt and equity capital markets.
If we are unable to renew or replace our existing credit facilities we could be required to further
reduce the size of the customer credit portfolio in order to repay the amounts outstanding under
our credit facilities. In order to reduce the size of the credit portfolio we would be required to
reduce, or possibly cease, originating new customer receivables until the amounts due under our
credit facilities are repaid. If necessary, in addition to available cash balances, cash flow from
operations and borrowing capacity under our revolving facilities, additional cash to fund our
operations and customer receivables balances could be obtained by:
|
|
|
reducing capital expenditures for updates of existing stores or new store
openings; |
|
|
|
|
taking advantage of longer payment terms and financing available for
inventory purchases; |
- 27 -
|
|
|
utilizing third-party sources to provide financing to our customers; |
|
|
|
|
reducing the size of our customer credit portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
reducing operating costs; |
|
|
|
|
negotiating to expand the capacity available under existing credit
facilities; and |
|
|
|
|
accessing new debt or equity markets. |
We can provide no assurance that we will be able to obtain these sources of funding on
favorable terms, if at all.
Capital expenditures.
We lease 72 of our 76 stores, and our plans for future store locations include primarily
leases, but do not exclude store ownership. Our capital expenditures for future new store projects
should primarily be for our tenant improvements to the property leased (including any new
distribution centers and warehouses), the cost of which is approximately $1.4 million per store,
and for our existing store remodels, in the range of $250,000 per store remodel, depending on store
size. In the event we purchase existing properties, our capital expenditures will depend on the
particular property and whether it is improved when purchased. We are continuously reviewing new
relationship and funding sources and alternatives for new stores, which may include
sale-leaseback or direct purchase-lease programs, as well as other funding sources for our
purchase and construction of those projects. If we are successful in these relationship developments, our direct cash needs should include only our capital expenditures
for tenant improvements to leased properties and our remodel programs for existing stores, but
could include full ownership if it meets our cash investment strategy. As a result of the recent
volatility in the capital markets, we modified our store opening plans and currently have no new
store openings planned. We have historically grown our new store count by about 10% per year and in
the future expect to return to this modest, controlled pace based on capital availability.
Cash flow.
Operating activities.
During the year ended January 31, 2010, net operating cash flows increased to $64.2 million
provided by operating activities, from $20.5 million used in operating activities in the twelve
months ended January 31, 2009. Operating cash flows for the year ended January 31, 2010 were
impacted primarily by decreased used of cash flow for customer receivables and a reduction in
inventories in light of reduced product sales. Operating cash flows were also increased by a drop
in Other accounts receivable, as amounts due from our vendors fell in the year ended January 31,
2010, as our vendors did not use sales incentive programs to the extent they did in fourth quarter
of the prior year. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable
balances, due largely to the reduction of inventory. There was also the impact of the decrease in
taxes payable due to the reduction in our taxable income in the year ended January 31, 2010 and the
overpayment of estimated taxes leading to the recoverable income taxes balance at year end.
During
the year ended January 31, 2009, net cash used in operating
activities decreased to
$20.5 million, from $39.4 million used in operating activities in the twelve months ended January
31, 2008. Operating cash flows for the current period were impacted primarily by the increased
retention of customer accounts receivable and increased inventories to support newly opened stores,
partially offset by an increase in accounts payable balances, due to the timing of inventory
purchases and taking advantage of payment terms available from our vendors.
- 28 -
Investing activities.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $3.2 million, from $13.3 million used in
the fiscal 2009 period to $10.1 million used in the fiscal 2010 period. The net decrease in cash
used in investing activities resulted primarily from a decline in purchases of property and
equipment compared to the prior fiscal year, as we opened fewer new stores in the fiscal 2010
period.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $7.3 million, from $6.0 million used in the
fiscal 2008 period to $13.3 million used in the fiscal 2009 period. The net increase in cash used
in investing activities resulted primarily from a decline in proceeds from sales of property and
equipment as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The cash expended for property
and equipment was used primarily for construction of new stores and the reformatting of existing
stores to better support our current product mix.
Financing activities.
Net cash from financing activities decreased by $88.5 million from $34.7 million provided
during the year ended January 31, 2009, to $53.8 million used during the year ended January 31,
2010, as we decreased the amount of net borrowings after repayments under our revolving credit
facility to fund the customer receivables generated and retained on our consolidated balance sheet.
Net cash from financing activities increased by $34.9 million from $0.2 million used during
the year ended January 31, 2008, to $34.7 million provided during the year ended January 31, 2009,
as we terminated our stock repurchase program in the period ended January 31, 2009 and increased
borrowings under our revolving credit facility to fund the new customer receivables generated and
retained on our consolidated balance sheet.
Certain transactions.
Since 1996, we have leased a retail store location of approximately 19,150 square feet in
Houston, Texas from Mr. Thomas J. Frank, Sr. Mr. Frank served as our Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer until June, 2009 and is the father of our Chief Executive Officer. The
lease provides for base monthly rental payments of $17,235 plus escrows for taxes, insurance and common area
maintenance expenses of increasing monthly amounts based on expenditures by the management company
operating the shopping center of which this store is a part through January 31, 2011. We also have
an option to renew the lease for two additional five-year terms. Mr. Frank received total payments
under this lease of $206,820 in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Based on market lease
rates for comparable retail space in the area, we believe that the terms of this lease are no less
favorable to us than we could have obtained in an arms length transaction at the date of the lease
commencement.
We engage the services of Direct Marketing Solutions, Inc., or DMS, for a substantial portion
of our direct mail advertising. Direct Marketing Solutions, Inc. is partially owned (less than
50%) by SF Holding Corp., members of the Stephens family, Jon E. M. Jacoby, and Douglas H. Martin.
SF Holding Corp. and the members of the Stephens family are significant shareholders of ours, and
Messrs. Jacoby and Martin are members of our Board of Directors. The fees we paid to DMS during
fiscal years ended 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounted to approximately $2.5 million, $4.0 million and
$2.4 million, respectively.
Contractual obligations.
The following table presents a summary of our known contractual obligations as of January 31,
2010, with respect to the specified categories, classified by payments due per period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
More Than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Long term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (1) |
|
$ |
105,904 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
105,749 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fixed rate notes of VIE (2) |
|
|
162,755 |
|
|
|
45,884 |
|
|
|
116,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate notes of VIE (3) |
|
|
196,400 |
|
|
|
26,400 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
|
153,394 |
|
|
|
22,008 |
|
|
|
41,469 |
|
|
|
34,724 |
|
|
|
55,193 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 29 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
More Than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Purchase obligations(4) |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
625,190 |
|
|
$ |
98,325 |
|
|
$ |
436,108 |
|
|
$ |
35,109 |
|
|
$ |
55,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
If the outstanding balance as of January 31, 2010 and the interest rate in effect at
that time were to remain the same over the remaining life of the facility, interest expense
on the facility would be approximately $3.1 million and $1.6 million for the fiscal years
ended January 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes interest payments due on the notes. |
|
(3) |
|
The $200 million 2002 Series A variable funding note is renewable at our option until
August 2011. If the outstanding balance as of January 31, 2010 and the interest rate in
effect at that time were to remain the same over the remaining lives of the notes, interest
expense on the notes would be approximately $5.6 million and $2.8 million for the fiscal
years ended January 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes contracts for long-term communication services. Does not include outstanding
purchase orders for merchandise, services or supplies which are ordered in the normal
course of operations and which generally are received and recorded within 30 days. |
- 30 -
exv99w4
EXHIBIT 99.4
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Conns, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Conns, Inc. as of January 31, 2010
and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2010. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Conns, Inc. at January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended January 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in
our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective February 1, 2010, the
Company retrospectively changed its method of accounting for its investment in its variable
interest entity.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Conns, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31,
2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 25,
2010, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Houston, Texas
March 25, 2010, except for Notes 2 and 14 as to which
the date is July 7, 2010
Conns, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
(includes balances of VIE of $111 and $104, respectively) |
|
$ |
11,909 |
|
|
$ |
12,247 |
|
Other accounts receivable, net of allowance of $60
and $50, respectively |
|
|
32,505 |
|
|
|
23,254 |
|
Customer accounts receivable, net of allowance of $13,735
and $19,204, respectively
(includes balances of VIE of $310,888 and $279,948, respectively) |
|
|
321,907 |
|
|
|
368,304 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
95,971 |
|
|
|
63,499 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
14,203 |
|
|
|
15,237 |
|
Federal income taxes recoverable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,148 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
5,933 |
|
|
|
8,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
482,428 |
|
|
|
498,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of customer accounts receivable, net of
allowance of $13,186 and $16,598, respectively
(includes balances of VIE of $298,470 and $241,971, respectively) |
|
|
389,748 |
|
|
|
318,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
7,682 |
|
|
|
7,682 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
12,011 |
|
|
|
10,480 |
|
Equipment and fixtures |
|
|
21,670 |
|
|
|
23,797 |
|
Transportation equipment |
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
83,361 |
|
|
|
91,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
127,370 |
|
|
|
135,053 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(64,819 |
) |
|
|
(75,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
62,551 |
|
|
|
59,703 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax asset |
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
5,485 |
|
Other assets, net
(includes balances of VIE of $7,545 and $7,106, respectively) |
|
|
11,197 |
|
|
|
10,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
957,566 |
|
|
$ |
892,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (includes balances of VIE of $92,500 and $63,900, respectively) |
|
$ |
92,505 |
|
|
$ |
64,055 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
57,809 |
|
|
|
39,944 |
|
Accrued compensation and related expenses |
|
|
11,473 |
|
|
|
5,697 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
24,843 |
|
|
|
31,685 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
Deferred revenues and allowances |
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
|
14,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
205,132 |
|
|
|
158,617 |
|
Long-term debt
(includes balances of VIE of $350,000 and $282,500, respectively) |
|
|
412,912 |
|
|
|
388,249 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,702 |
|
|
|
5,195 |
|
Fair value of interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
Deferred gain on sale of property |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued or outstanding) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized;
24,167,445 and 24,194,555 shares issued at January 31, 2009 and
2010, respectively) |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
103,553 |
|
|
|
106,226 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
266,060 |
|
|
|
269,984 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,723,205 shares |
|
|
(37,071 |
) |
|
|
(37,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
332,784 |
|
|
|
339,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
957,566 |
|
|
$ |
892,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 2 -
Conns, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except earnings per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
671,571 |
|
|
$ |
743,729 |
|
|
$ |
667,401 |
|
Repair service agreement commissions (net) |
|
|
36,424 |
|
|
|
40,199 |
|
|
|
33,272 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
22,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
730,992 |
|
|
|
805,049 |
|
|
|
722,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
139,538 |
|
|
|
154,492 |
|
|
|
152,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
870,530 |
|
|
|
959,541 |
|
|
|
875,585 |
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and
occupancy costs |
|
|
508,787 |
|
|
|
580,423 |
|
|
|
534,299 |
|
Cost of service parts sold, including warehousing
and occupancy cost |
|
|
8,379 |
|
|
|
9,638 |
|
|
|
10,401 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
245,761 |
|
|
|
254,172 |
|
|
|
255,942 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
19,465 |
|
|
|
27,952 |
|
|
|
36,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
782,392 |
|
|
|
872,185 |
|
|
|
847,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
88,138 |
|
|
|
87,356 |
|
|
|
28,483 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
24,839 |
|
|
|
23,597 |
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
64,242 |
|
|
|
63,642 |
|
|
|
8,035 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
22,575 |
|
|
|
23,624 |
|
|
|
4,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
41,667 |
|
|
$ |
40,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
23,193 |
|
|
|
22,413 |
|
|
|
22,456 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
23,673 |
|
|
|
22,577 |
|
|
|
22,610 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 3 -
Conns, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance January 31, 2007 |
|
|
23,810 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
6,305 |
|
|
$ |
93,365 |
|
|
$ |
196,417 |
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,797 |
) |
|
$ |
292,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of changes
in accounting principles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,347 |
) |
Exercise of options, including
tax benefit |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,243 |
|
Issuance of common stock
under Employee Stock Purchase
Plan |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
(33,274 |
) |
|
|
(33,274 |
) |
Return of shares |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 31, 2008 |
|
|
24,098 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,514 |
|
|
|
226,042 |
|
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
(37,071 |
) |
|
|
288,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options,
including tax benefit |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615 |
|
Issuance of common stock
under Employee Stock Purchase
Plan |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 31, 2009 |
|
|
24,167 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,553 |
|
|
|
266,060 |
|
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
(37,071 |
) |
|
|
332,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
under Employee stock Purchase
Plan |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of fair value of
interest rate swaps, net of
tax benefit of $118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 31, 2010 |
|
|
24,194 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
(218 |
) |
|
$ |
106,226 |
|
|
$ |
269,984 |
|
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,071 |
) |
|
$ |
339,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 4 -
Conns, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
41,667 |
|
|
$ |
40,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,924 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
12,441 |
|
|
|
12,672 |
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
Amortization / (Accretion), net |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
496 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
19,465 |
|
|
|
27,952 |
|
|
|
36,843 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
(4,051 |
) |
|
|
(3,499 |
) |
Loss (gain) from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
Discounts and accretion on promotional credit |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
(639 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
(98,658 |
) |
|
|
(119,320 |
) |
|
|
(11,139 |
) |
Other accounts receivable |
|
|
(5,390 |
) |
|
|
(4,783 |
) |
|
|
9,251 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
5,603 |
|
|
|
(14,476 |
) |
|
|
32,472 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
(1,481 |
) |
|
|
(2,087 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(22,849 |
) |
|
|
29,631 |
|
|
|
(17,866 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
3,540 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
2,686 |
|
|
|
(10,568 |
) |
Deferred revenues and allowances |
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
5,085 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(39,371 |
) |
|
|
(20,468 |
) |
|
|
64,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(18,955 |
) |
|
|
(17,597 |
) |
|
|
(10,255 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property |
|
|
8,921 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Changes in restricted cash balances |
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
4,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(6,009 |
) |
|
|
(13,344 |
) |
|
|
(10,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from stock issued under employee benefit
plans, including tax benefit |
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(33,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under lines of credit |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
300,800 |
|
|
|
270,838 |
|
Payments on lines of credit |
|
|
(120,000 |
) |
|
|
(263,400 |
) |
|
|
(324,340 |
) |
Increase in debt issuance costs |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(3,453 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
Payment of promissory notes |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
34,697 |
|
|
|
(53,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash |
|
|
(45,573 |
) |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year |
|
|
56,597 |
|
|
|
11,024 |
|
|
|
11,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year |
|
$ |
11,024 |
|
|
$ |
11,909 |
|
|
$ |
12,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest paid |
|
$ |
25,560 |
|
|
$ |
23,753 |
|
|
$ |
20,449 |
|
Cash income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
|
22,935 |
|
|
|
24,950 |
|
|
|
18,163 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment with debt financing |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473 |
|
Sales of property and equipment financed by notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 5 -
CONNS ,INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2010
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Conns, Inc. and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company), including the Companys VIE,
as defined below. The liabilities of the VIE and the assets specifically collateralizing those
obligations are not available for the general use of the Company and have been parenthetically
presented on the face of the Companys balance sheet. Conns, Inc. is a holding company with no
independent assets or operations other than its investments in its subsidiaries. All material
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation
Business Activities. The Company, through its retail stores, provides products and services to
its customer base in seven primary market areas, including southern Louisiana, southeast Texas,
Houston, South Texas, San Antonio/Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth and Oklahoma. Products and services
offered through retail sales outlets include home appliances, consumer electronics, home office
equipment, lawn and garden products, mattresses, furniture, repair service agreements, installment
and revolving credit account programs, and various credit insurance products. These activities are
supported through an extensive service, warehouse and distribution system. For the reasons
discussed below, the Company has aggregated its results into two operating segments: credit and
retail. The Companys retail stores bear the Conns name, and deliver the same products and
services to a common customer group. The Companys customers generally are individuals rather than
commercial accounts. All of the retail stores follow the same procedures and methods in managing
their operations. The Companys management evaluates performance and allocates resources based on
the operating results of its retail and credit segments. With the adoption of the new accounting
principles discussed in Note 2, which requires the consolidation of the Companys variable interest
entity engaged in receivables securitizations, it began separately evaluating the performance of
its retail and credit operations. As a result, the Company believes it is appropriate to disclose
separate financial information of its retail and credit segments. The separate financial
information is disclosed in Note 14 Segment Reporting.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Vendor Programs. The Company receives funds from vendors for price protection, product
rebates (earned upon purchase or sale of product), marketing, training and promotional programs
which are recorded on the accrual basis, as a reduction of the related product cost or advertising
expense, according to the nature of the program. The Company accrues rebates based on the
satisfaction of terms of the program and sales of qualifying products even though funds may not be
received until the end of a quarter or year. If the programs are related to product purchases, the
allowances, credits, or payments are recorded as a reduction of product cost; if the programs are
related to product sales, the allowances, credits or payments are recorded as a reduction of cost
of goods sold; if the programs are directly related to marketing or promotion of the product, the
allowances, credits, or payments are recorded as a reduction of advertising expense in the period
in which the expense is incurred. Vendor rebates earned and recorded as a reduction of product cost
and cost of goods sold totaled $29.5 million, $39.8 million and $46.2 million for the years ended
January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The increase in the current year is due to increased
use of instant rebates by vendors to drive sales. Over the past three years the Company has
received funds from approximately 50 vendors, with the terms of the programs ranging between one
month and one year.
- 6 -
Earnings Per Share. The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the
dilutive effects of any stock options granted, which is calculated using the treasury-stock method.
The following table sets forth the shares outstanding for the earnings per share calculations
(shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
Common stock outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
23,642 |
|
|
|
22,375 |
|
|
|
22,444 |
|
Weighted average common stock issued in stock
option exercises |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common stock issued to employee
stock purchase plan |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Less: Weighted average treasury shares purchased |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic earnings per share |
|
|
23,193 |
|
|
|
22,413 |
|
|
|
22,456 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options, net of assumed
repurchase of treasury stock |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted earnings per share |
|
|
23,673 |
|
|
|
22,577 |
|
|
|
22,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the periods presented, options with an exercise price in excess of the average
market price of the Companys common stock are excluded from the calculation of the dilutive effect
of stock options for diluted earnings per share calculations. The weighted average number of
options not included in the calculation of the dilutive effect of stock options was 0.4 million,
1.2 million, and 1.5 million for each of the years ended January 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010
respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased
with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Credit card deposits in-transit of
$5.3 million and $4.7 million, as of January 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, are included in cash
and cash equivalents.
Inventories. Inventories consist of finished goods or parts and are valued at the lower of
cost (moving weighted average method) or market.
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Costs associated with
major additions and betterments that increase the value or extend the lives of assets are
capitalized and depreciated. Normal repairs and maintenance that do not materially improve or
extend the lives of the respective assets are charged to operating expenses as incurred.
Depreciation, which includes amortization of capitalized leases, is computed on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or in the case of leasehold improvements,
over the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the remaining terms of the respective leases. The
estimated lives used to compute depreciation expense are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
30 years |
Equipment and fixtures |
|
3 5 years |
Transportation equipment |
|
3 years |
Leasehold improvements |
|
5 15 years |
Property and equipment are evaluated for impairment at the retail store level. The
Company performs a periodic assessment of assets for impairment. Additionally, an impairment
evaluation is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of the assets might not be recoverable. The most likely condition that would necessitate an
assessment would be an adverse change in historical and estimated future results of a retail
stores performance. For property and equipment to be held and used, the Company recognizes an
impairment loss if its carrying amount is not recoverable through its undiscounted cash flows and
measures the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying amount and fair value. No
impairment was recorded in the years ended January 31, 2008, 2009 or 2010.
All gains and losses on sale of assets are included in Other (income) expense in the consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
Gain (loss) on sale of assets |
|
|
943 |
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
- 7 -
Customer Accounts Receivable. Customer accounts receivable reported in the consolidated
balance sheet includes receivables transferred to the Companys VIE and those receivables not
transferred to the VIE. The Company records the amount of principal and accrued interest on
Customer receivables that is expected to be collected within the next twelve months, based on
contractual terms, in current assets on its consolidated balance sheet. Those amounts expected to
be collected after twelve months, based on contractual terms, are included in long-term assets.
Typically, customer receivables are considered delinquent if a payment has not been received on the
scheduled due date. Additionally, the Company offers reage programs to customers with past due
balances that have experienced a financial hardship; if they meet the conditions of the Companys
reage policy. Reaging a customers account can result in updating an account from a delinquent
status to a current status. Generally, an account that is delinquent more than 120 days and for
which no payment has been received in the past seven months will be charged-off against the
allowance for doubtful accounts and interest accrued subsequent to the last payment will be
reversed. The Company has a secured interest in the merchandise financed by these receivables and
therefore has the opportunity to recover a portion of the charged-off amount.
Interest Income on Customer Accounts Receivable. Interest income is accrued using the Rule of
78s method for installment contracts and the simple interest method for revolving charge accounts,
and is reflected in Finance charges and other. Typically, interest income is accrued until the
contract or account is paid off or charged-off and we provide an allowance for estimated
uncollectible interest. Interest income is recognized on interest-free promotion credit programs
based on the Companys historical experience related to customers that fail to satisfy the
requirements of the interest-free programs. Additionally, for sales on deferred interest and same
as cash programs that exceed one year in duration, the Company discounts the sales to their fair
value, resulting in a reduction in sales and customer receivables, and amortizes the discount
amount to Finance charges and other over the term of the program. The amount of customer
receivables carried on the Companys consolidated balance sheet that were past due 90 days or more
and still accruing interest was $41.0 million and $54.8 million at January 31, 2009 and 2010,
respectively.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts,
including estimated uncollectible interest, for its Customer and Other accounts receivable, based
on its historical net loss experience and expectations for future losses. The net charge-off data
used in computing the loss rate is reduced by the amount of post-charge-off recoveries received,
including cash payments, amounts realized from the repossession of the products financed and, at
times, payments received under credit insurance policies. Additionally, the Company separately
evaluates the Primary and Secondary portfolios when estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts.
The balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts and uncollectible interest for customer
receivables was $26.9 million and $35.8 million, at January 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Additionally, as a result of the Companys practice of reaging customer accounts, if the account is
not ultimately collected, the timing and amount of the charge-off is impacted. If these accounts
had been charged-off sooner the net loss rates might have been higher.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of consideration paid over the fair value of
tangible and identifiable intangible net assets acquired in connection with the acquisitions of
certain of the Companys insurance and finance operations. The Company performs an assessment
annually in the fourth quarter testing for the impairment of goodwill, or at any other time when
impairment indicators exist. As a result of the sustained decline in the Companys market
capitalization, the increasingly challenging economic environment during the current year third
quarter, and its impact on the Companys comparable store sales, credit portfolio performance and
operating results, the Company determined that an interim goodwill impairment test was necessary
during the current year third quarter.
A two-step method was utilized for determining goodwill impairment. The valuation of the
Company was performed utilizing the services of outside valuation consultants using both an income
approach utilizing discounted debt-free cash flows of the Company and comparable valuation
multiples. Upon completion of the impairment test, the Company concluded that the carrying value of
the Companys recorded goodwill was impaired. As a result, the Company recorded a goodwill
impairment charge of $9.6 million in the current year third quarter, reducing the balance of
goodwill on its balance sheet to zero.
Other Assets. The Company has certain deferred financing costs for transactions that have not
yet been completed and has not begun amortization of those costs. These costs are included in Other
assets, net, on the balance sheet and will be amortized upon completion of the related financing
- 8 -
transaction or expensed in the event the Company fails to complete such a transaction. The
Company also has certain restricted cash balances included in Other assets. The restricted cash
balances represent collateral for note holders of the Companys VIE, and the amount is expected to
decrease as the respective notes are repaid. However, the required balance could increase dependent
on certain net portfolio yield requirements. The balance of this restricted cash account was $6.0
million at both January 31, 2009 and 2010.
Income Taxes. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in
multiple state jurisdictions. The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences
between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the tax
rates and laws that are expected be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. To the
extent penalties and interest are incurred, the Company records these charges as a component of its
Provision for income taxes. Tax returns for the fiscal years subsequent to January 31, 2006, remain
open for examination by the Companys major taxing jurisdictions.
Sales Taxes. The Company records and reports all sales taxes collected on a net basis in the
financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. Revenues from the sale of retail products are recognized at the time the
customer takes possession of the product. Such revenues are recognized net of any adjustments for
sales incentive offers such as discounts, coupons, rebates or other free products or services and
discounts of promotional credit sales that extend beyond one year. The Company sells repair service
agreements and credit insurance contracts on behalf of unrelated third parties. For contracts where
third parties are the obligor on the contract, commissions are recognized in revenues at the time
of sale, and in the case of retrospective commissions, at the time that they are earned. The
Company records a receivable for earned but unremitted retrospective commissions and reserves for
future cancellations of repair service agreements and credit insurance contracts estimated based on
historical experience. When the Company sells repair service agreements in which it is deemed to be
the obligor on the contract at the time of sale, revenue is recognized ratably, on a straight-line
basis, over the term of the repair service agreement. These Company-obligor repair service
agreements are contracts which provide customers protection against product repair costs arising
after the expiration of the manufacturers warranty and any third-party obligor contracts. These
agreements typically have terms ranging from 12 months to 36 months. These agreements are separate
units of accounting and are valued based on the agreed upon retail selling price. The amounts of
repair service agreement revenue deferred at January 31, 2009 and 2010, were $7.2 million and $7.3
million, respectively, and are included in Deferred revenue and allowances in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. Under the contracts, the Company defers and amortizes its direct
selling expenses over the contract term and records the cost of the service work performed as
products are repaired.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the
deferred revenue on the Companys repair service agreements and the amount of claims paid under
those agreements (in thousands):
Reconciliation of deferred revenues on repair service agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance in deferred revenues at beginning of year |
|
$ |
6,373 |
|
|
$ |
7,213 |
|
Revenues earned during the year |
|
|
(6,482 |
) |
|
|
(7,027 |
) |
Revenues deferred on sales of new agreements |
|
|
7,322 |
|
|
|
7,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance in deferred revenues at end of year |
|
$ |
7,213 |
|
|
$ |
7,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims incurred during the year, excludes selling expenses |
|
$ |
2,529 |
|
|
$ |
3,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales on interest-free promotional credit programs are recognized at the time the
customer takes possession of the product, consistent with the above stated policy. Considering the
short-term nature of interest free programs for terms less than one year, sales are recorded at
full value and are not discounted. Sales financed by longer-term (18-, 24- and 36-month) interest
free programs are recorded at their net present value. The discount to net present value results in
a reduction in net sales, which totaled $7.2 million, $5.8 million and $4.8 million for the years
ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Eligible receivables arising out of the
Companys interest-free programs are transferred to
- 9 -
the Companys VIE, net of the discount, with other qualifying customer receivables. Customer
receivables arising out of the interest-free programs that are retained by the Company are carried
on the consolidated balance sheet net of the discount, which is amortized into income over the life
of the receivable as an adjustment to Finance charges and other.
The Company classifies amounts billed to customers relating to shipping and handling as
revenues. Costs of $22.0 million, $20.8 million and $19.3 million associated with shipping and
handling revenues are included in Selling, general and administrative expense for the years ended
January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents,
receivables, and accounts payable approximate their carrying amounts because of the short maturity
of these instruments. The fair value of the Companys asset-based revolving credit facility is
determined by estimating the present value of future cash flows as if the debt were being carried
at the interest rate the Company would currently incur if it were to complete a similar
transaction. The fair value of the Companys asset-based revolving credit facility as of January
31, 2010 was approximately $104.0 million, based on the assumption that the interest spread would
be approximately 100 basis points higher than the current spread in the revolving facility. The
carrying amount of the long-term debt as of January 31, 2010 was approximately $105.5 million. The
estimated fair value of the VIEs $196.4 million 2002 Series A variable funding note approximates
its carrying amount due to its short maturity and the variable nature of its interest rate. The
estimated fair value of the VIEs $150 million 2006 Series A medium term notes was approximately
$117 million and $139 million as of January 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, based on its estimate
of the rates available at these dates for instruments with similar terms and maturities. The
Companys interest rate swaps are presented on the balance sheet at fair value.
Share-Based Compensation. For stock option grants after our IPO in November 2003, the Company
has used the Black-Scholes model to determine fair value. Share-based compensation expense is
recorded, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the
applicable grant. Prior to the IPO, the value of the options issued was estimated using the minimum
valuation option-pricing model. Since the minimum valuation option-pricing model does not qualify
as a fair value pricing model, the Company followed the intrinsic value method of accounting for
share-based compensation to employees for these grants.
Self-insurance. The Company is self-insured for certain losses relating to group health,
workers compensation, automobile, general and product liability claims. The Company has stop loss
coverage to limit the exposure arising from these claims. Self-insurance losses for claims filed
and claims incurred, but not reported, are accrued based upon the Companys estimates of the
aggregate liability for claims incurred using development factors based on historical experience.
Expense Classifications. The Company records Cost of goods sold as the direct cost of
products sold, any related out-bound freight costs, and receiving costs, inspection costs, internal
transfer costs, and other costs associated with the operations of its distribution system.
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense included in Selling, general and
administrative expense for the years ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Gross advertising expense |
|
$ |
35,647 |
|
|
$ |
36,289 |
|
|
$ |
30,552 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor rebates |
|
|
(6,591 |
) |
|
|
(6,440 |
) |
|
|
(5,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net advertising expense in
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
$ |
29,056 |
|
|
$ |
29,849 |
|
|
$ |
25,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Company records as Cost of service parts sold the direct cost of parts
used in its service operation and the related inbound freight costs, purchasing and receiving
costs, inspection costs, internal transfer costs, and other costs associated with the parts
distribution operation.
The costs associated with the Companys merchandising function, including product purchasing,
advertising, sales commissions, and all store occupancy costs are included in Selling, general and
administrative expense.
Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior years financial
statements to conform to the current years presentation. The Company reclassified approximately
$5.7
- 10 -
million from Deferred revenues and allowances in current liabilities to Other long-term
liabilities. This represents the amount of deferred revenues on tenant improvement allowances that
will be realized beyond twelve months.
2. Adoption of New Accounting Principles.
The Company enters into securitization transactions to
transfer eligible retail installment and revolving customer receivables and retains servicing
responsibilities and subordinated interests. Additionally, the Company transfers the eligible
customer receivables to a bankruptcy-remote variable interest entity (VIE). In June 2009, the FASB
issued revised authoritative guidance to improve the relevance and comparability of the information
that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about:
|
|
|
a transfer of financial assets; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows; |
|
|
|
|
transferors continuing involvement, if any, in
transferred financial assets; and |
|
|
|
|
Improvements in financial reporting by companies involved with variable
interest entities to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of
financial statements by requiring an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine
whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the
following characteristics: |
|
a) |
|
The power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that
most significantly impact the entitys economic performance, and |
|
|
b) |
|
The obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be
significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from
the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. |
After the effective date, the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity is no longer
relevant for accounting purposes. Therefore, formerly qualifying special-purpose entities (as
defined under previous accounting standards) should be evaluated for consolidation by reporting
entities on and after the effective date in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance.
If the evaluation on the effective date results in consolidation, the reporting entity should apply
the transition guidance provided in the pronouncement that requires consolidation. The new
FASB-issued authoritative guidance was effective for the Company beginning February 1, 2010.
The Company determined that it qualifies as the primary beneficiary of its VIE based on the
following considerations:
|
|
|
The Company directs the activities that generate the customer receivables that
are transferred to the VIE, |
|
|
|
|
The Company directs the servicing activities related the collection of the
customer receivables transferred to the VIE, |
|
|
|
|
The Company absorbs all losses incurred by the VIE to the extent of its
residual interest in the customer receivables held by the VIE before any other
investors incur losses, and |
|
|
|
|
The Company has the rights to receive all benefits generated by the VIE after
paying the contractual amounts due to the other investors. |
As a result of the Companys adoption of the provisions of the new guidance, effective
February 1, 2010, the Companys VIE, which is engaged in customer receivable financing and
securitization, is being consolidated in the Companys balance sheet and the Companys statements
of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows. Previously, the operations of the VIE were
reported off-balance sheet. The Company has elected to apply the provisions of this new guidance by
retrospectively restating prior period financial statements to give effect to the consolidation of
the VIE, presenting the balances at their carrying value as if they had always been carried on its
balance sheet. The retrospective application impacted the comparative prior period financial
statements as follows:
- 11 -
|
|
|
For the years ended January 31, 2008 and 2009, Income before income taxes was
increased by approximately $3.0 million and $22.1 million, respectively, and for the
year ended January 31, 2010, Income before income taxes was reduced by approximately
$5.9 million. |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended January 31, 2008 and 2009, Net income was increased by
approximately $2.0 million and $14.3 million, respectively, and for the year ended
January 31, 2010, Net income was reduced by approximately $3.8 million. |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended January 31, 2008 and 2009, Basic earnings per share was
increased by $0.09 and $0.64, respectively, and for the year ended January 31, 2010,
Basic earnings per share was reduced by $0.17. |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended January 31, 2008 and 2009, Diluted earnings per share was
increased by $0.08 and $0.63, respectively, and for the year ended January 31, 2010,
Diluted earnings per share was reduced by $0.17. |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended January 31, 2008, Cash flows from operating activities was
reduced by approximately $33.7 million, Cash flows from investing activities was
increased by approximately $4.0 million and Cash flows from financing activities was
increased by approximately $29.7 million. |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended January 31, 2009, Cash flows from operating activities was
increased by approximately $22.2 million, Cash flows from investing activities was
increased by approximately $4.0 million and Cash flows from financing activities was
reduced by approximately $26.2 million. |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended January 31, 2010, Cash flows from operating activities was
increased by approximately $96.1 million and Cash flows from financing activities was
reduced by approximately $96.1 million. |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2009, the net of current assets and current liabilities
decreased approximately $7.5 million and at January 31, 2010, the net current assets
and current liabilities increased approximately $25.4 million; |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2009 and 2010, Customer accounts receivable, net, were
increased approximately $609.4 million and $488.5 million, respectively. Net deferred
tax assets were increased approximately $0.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively,
and Other assets were increased approximately $7.5 million and $7.1 million,
respectively; |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2009 and 2010, Interests in the securitized assets of its VIE
of approximately $176.5 million and $157.7 million, respectively, was eliminated; |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2009 and 2010, current and long-term debt were increased
approximately $92.5 million and $63.9 million and $350.0 million and $282.5 million,
respectively; and |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2009 and 2010, Retained earnings was decreased approximately
$1.4 million and $5.2 million, respectively. |
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and
the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162
(ASC 105-10-65/FAS 168). The standard establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(the Codification or ASC) as the single source of authoritative accounting principles
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP, and is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative
GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The
Codification requires companies to change how they reference GAAP throughout the financial
statements. The Company adopted the Codification and has provided the pre-Codification reference
along with the related ASC references within this section to allow readers an opportunity to see
the impact of the Codification on its financial statements and disclosures.
On February 1, 2009, the Company was required to adopt SFAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, (ASC 815-10-65/SFAS
161). This statement is intended to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring
enhanced disclosures of an entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects
on the entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. ASC 815-10-65/SFAS 161
applies to all
- 12 -
derivative instruments within the scope of SFAS 133, as well as related hedged items,
bifurcated derivatives, and non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging
instruments. ASC 815-10-65/FAS 161 only impacts disclosure requirements and therefore did not have
an impact on the Companys financial position, financial performance or cash flows. The required
disclosures have been included in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion
No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, (ASC 825-10-65/FSP 107-1
and APB 28-1), which requires the Company to provide disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments in each interim and annual period that financial statements are prepared. The Company
adopted the provisions of ASC 825-10-65/FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1, which became effective for periods
ended after June 15, 2009.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (ASC 855-10/SFAS165), which
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The
Company adopted the provisions of ASC 855-10/SFAS No. 165, which became effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ended after June 15, 2009. Subsequent events have been evaluated and
material subsequent events that have occurred since January 31, 2010 are discussed in Note 13 to
the consolidated financial statements.
3. Supplemental Disclosure of Finance Charges and Other Revenue
The following is a summary of the classification of the amounts included as Finance charges
and other for the year ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest income and fees on customer receivables |
|
$ |
117,186 |
|
|
$ |
132,270 |
|
|
$ |
135,828 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
21,402 |
|
|
|
20,061 |
|
|
|
16,437 |
|
Other |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
$ |
139,538 |
|
|
$ |
154,492 |
|
|
$ |
152,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Supplemental Disclosure of Customer Receivables
The following illustration presents quantitative information about the receivables portfolios
managed by the Company (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Outstanding
Balance |
|
|
|
Customer Receivables |
|
|
60 Days Past Due (1) |
|
|
Reaged (1) |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Primary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
$ |
551,838 |
|
|
$ |
555,573 |
|
|
$ |
33,126 |
|
|
$ |
46,758 |
|
|
$ |
88,224 |
|
|
$ |
93,219 |
|
Revolving |
|
|
38,084 |
|
|
|
41,787 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
589,922 |
|
|
|
597,360 |
|
|
|
35,153 |
|
|
|
48,775 |
|
|
|
90,625 |
|
|
|
95,038 |
|
Secondary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
|
163,591 |
|
|
|
138,681 |
|
|
|
19,988 |
|
|
|
24,616 |
|
|
|
50,537 |
|
|
|
49,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
|
753,513 |
|
|
|
736,041 |
|
|
$ |
55,141 |
|
|
$ |
73,391 |
|
|
$ |
141,162 |
|
|
$ |
144,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(26,921 |
) |
|
|
(35,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowances for promotional credit
programs |
|
|
(14,937 |
) |
|
|
(13,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of customer
accounts receivable, net |
|
|
321,907 |
|
|
|
368,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current customer accounts
receivable, net |
|
$ |
389,748 |
|
|
$ |
318,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables transferred to the VIE |
|
$ |
645,715 |
|
|
$ |
521,919 |
|
|
$ |
52,214 |
|
|
$ |
59,840 |
|
|
$ |
131,839 |
|
|
$ |
122,521 |
|
Receivables not transferred to the VIE |
|
|
107,798 |
|
|
|
214,122 |
|
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
|
13,551 |
|
|
|
9,269 |
|
|
|
21,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
$ |
753,513 |
|
|
$ |
736,041 |
|
|
$ |
55,141 |
|
|
$ |
73,391 |
|
|
$ |
141,162 |
|
|
$ |
144,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are based on end of period balances and accounts could be represented in
both the past due and reaged columns shown above. |
- 13 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Credit |
|
|
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, (2) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Primary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
$ |
495,489 |
|
|
$ |
557,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving |
|
|
43,184 |
|
|
|
35,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
538,673 |
|
|
|
592,376 |
|
|
$ |
15,071 |
|
|
$ |
20,777 |
|
Secondary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
|
157,529 |
|
|
|
151,380 |
|
|
|
7,291 |
|
|
|
8,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
$ |
696,202 |
|
|
$ |
743,756 |
|
|
$ |
22,362 |
|
|
$ |
28,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables transferred to the VIE |
|
$ |
651,420 |
|
|
$ |
559,028 |
|
|
$ |
21,573 |
|
|
$ |
25,335 |
|
Receivables not transferred to the VIE |
|
|
44,782 |
|
|
|
184,728 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
$ |
696,202 |
|
|
$ |
743,756 |
|
|
$ |
22,362 |
|
|
$ |
28,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Amounts represent total credit charge-offs, net of recoveries, on total customer
receivables. |
5. Debt and Letters of Credit
The Companys borrowing facilities consist of a $210 million asset-based revolving credit
facility, a $10 million unsecured revolving line of credit, its VIEs 2002 Series A variable
funding note and its VIEs 2006 Series A medium term notes. Debt consisted of the following at the
periods ended (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Asset-based revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
62,900 |
|
|
$ |
105,498 |
|
2002 Series A Variable Funding Note |
|
|
292,500 |
|
|
|
196,400 |
|
2006 Series A Notes |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Unsecured revolving line of credit for $10 million maturing in September 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
505,417 |
|
|
|
452,304 |
|
Less current portion of debt |
|
|
92,505 |
|
|
|
64,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts classified as long-term |
|
$ |
412,912 |
|
|
$ |
388,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys $210 million asset-based revolving credit facility provides funding based
on a borrowing base calculation that includes customer accounts receivable and inventory and
matures in August 2011. The credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 325
basis points to 375 basis points, based on a fixed charge coverage ratio. In addition to the fixed
charge coverage ratio, the revolving credit facility includes a total liabilities to tangible net
worth requirement, a minimum customer receivables cash recovery percentage requirement, a net
capital expenditures limit and combined portfolio performance covenants. The Company was in
compliance with the covenants, as amended, at January 31, 2010. Additionally, the agreement
contains cross-default provisions, such that, any default under another credit facility of the
Company or its VIE would result in a default under this agreement, and any default under this
agreement would result in a default under those agreements. The asset-based revolving credit
facility restricts the amount of dividends the Company can pay and is secured by the assets of the
Company not otherwise encumbered.
The 2002 Series A program functions as a revolving credit facility to fund the transfer of
eligible customer receivables to the VIE. When the outstanding balance of the facility approaches a
predetermined amount, the VIE (Issuer) is required to seek financing to pay down the outstanding
balance in the 2002 Series A variable funding note. The amount paid down on the facility then
becomes available to fund the transfer of new customer receivables or to meet required principal
payments on other series as they become due. The new financing could be in the form of additional
notes, bonds or other instruments as the market and transaction documents might allow. Given the
current state of the financial markets, especially with respect to asset-backed securitization
financing, the Company has been unable to issue medium-term notes or increase the availability
under the existing variable funding note program. The 2002 Series A program consists of $200
million that is renewable annually, at the Companys option, until August 2011 and bears interest
at commercial paper rates plus a spread of 250 basis points. In connection with amendments,
discussed in Note 13, to the 2002 Series A facility, the VIE
- 14 -
agreed to reduce the total available commitment to $170 million in April 2010 and to $130
million in April 2011.
The 2006 Series A program, which was consummated in August 2006, is non-amortizing for the
first four years and officially matures in April 2017. However, it is expected that the scheduled
$7.5 million principal payments, which begin in September 2010, will retire the bonds prior to that
date. The VIEs borrowing agreements contain certain covenants requiring the maintenance of various
financial ratios and customer receivables performance standards. The Issuer was in compliance with
the requirements of the agreements, as amended, as of January 31, 2010. The VIEs debt is secured
by the Customer accounts receivable that are transferred to it, which are included in Customer
accounts receivable and Long-term portion of customer accounts receivable on the consolidated
balance sheet. The investors and the securitization trustee have no recourse to the Companys other
assets for failure of the individual customers of the Company and the VIE to pay when due.
Additionally, the Company has no recourse to the VIEs assets to satisfy its obligations. The
Companys retained interests in the customer receivables collateralizing the securitization program
and the related cash flows are subordinate to the investors interests, and would not be paid if
the Issuer is unable to repay the amounts due under the 2002 Series A and 2006 Series A programs.
The ultimate realization of the retained interest is subject to credit, prepayment, and interest
rate risks on the transferred financial assets.
As of January 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $34.1 million under its asset-based
revolving credit facility, net of standby letters of credit issued, and $10.0 million under its
unsecured bank line of credit immediately available for general corporate purposes. The Company
also had $46.7 million that may become available under its asset-based revolving credit facility as
it grows the balance of eligible customer receivables and its total eligible inventory balances.
The Companys assetbased revolving credit facility provides it the ability to utilize letters
of credit to secure its obligations as the servicer under its VIEs asset-backed securitization
program, deductibles under the Companys property and casualty insurance programs and international
product purchases, among other acceptable uses. At January 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding
letters of credit of $23.7 million under this facility. The maximum potential amount of future
payments under these letter of credit facilities is considered to be the aggregate face amount of
each letter of credit commitment, which totals $23.7 million as of January 31, 2010.
Interest expense incurred on notes payable and long-term debt totaled $25.9, $24.1 and $20.7
million for the years ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The Company capitalized
borrowing costs of $0.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million during the years ended January 31,
2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Aggregate maturities of long-term debt as of January 31 in the
year indicated are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
64,055 |
|
2012 |
|
|
365,665 |
|
2013 |
|
|
22,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
452,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 13 for additional information related to the Companys and the VIEs long-term
debt.
The Company held interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $40.0 million as of
January 31, 2010, with terms extending through July 2011 for the purpose of hedging against
variable interest rate risk related to the variability of cash flows in the interest payments on a
portion of its variable-rate debt, based on changes in the benchmark one-month LIBOR interest rate.
Changes in the cash flows of the interest rate swaps are expected to exactly offset the changes in
cash flows (changes in base interest rate payments) attributable to fluctuations in the LIBOR
interest rate. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge,
the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during
which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing
either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are
recognized in current earnings.
- 15 -
For information on the location and amounts of derivative fair values in the financial
statements, see the tables presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
|
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or |
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
in |
|
|
Income on |
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Gain or |
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
Income on |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
from |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
in OCI on |
|
|
from |
|
|
OCI into |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Income |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
Derivatives in |
|
(Effective |
|
|
OCI into |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
Excluded |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
Cash Flow |
|
Portion) |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
from |
|
|
Testing) |
|
Hedging |
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Year Ended January 31 |
|
Relationships |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(218 |
) |
|
(expense) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(308 |
) |
|
(expense) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary timing differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used
for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Companys net deferred tax assets result
primarily from differences between financial and tax methods of accounting for income recognition
on service contracts and residual interests, capitalization of costs in inventory, amortization of
goodwill, deductions for depreciation and doubtful accounts (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and warranty and
insurance cancellations |
|
$ |
10,311 |
|
|
$ |
12,849 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
946 |
|
Straight-line rent accrual |
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
2,209 |
|
Margin tax |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
Accrued reserves and other |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
2,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
19,701 |
|
|
|
23,777 |
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tax receivable |
|
|
(1,241 |
) |
|
|
(1,416 |
) |
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(670 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 16 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Other |
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
(969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(3,473 |
) |
|
|
(3,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Asset |
|
$ |
16,228 |
|
|
$ |
20,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal year 2010, as a result of the goodwill impairment charge taken during the
third quarter, the Company recorded an increase in current tax expense and a decrease in deferred
tax expense of $2.5 million.
The significant components of income taxes were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
22,279 |
|
|
$ |
26,042 |
|
|
$ |
6,376 |
|
State |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
22,246 |
|
|
|
27,678 |
|
|
|
7,593 |
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
(4,015 |
) |
|
|
(3,441 |
) |
State |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(4,054 |
) |
|
|
(3,482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax provision |
|
$ |
$22,575 |
|
|
$ |
23,624 |
|
|
$ |
4,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for each of the
periods presented in the statements of operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
U.S. Federal statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Non-deductible entertainment,
non-deductible stock-based compensation,
non-deductible goodwill impairment, tax-free interest
income and other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
51.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes were impacted during the years ended January 31, 2009 and 2010, by the
replacement of the existing franchise tax in Texas with a taxed based on margin. Taxable margin is
generally defined as total federal tax revenues minus the greater of (a) cost of goods sold or (b)
compensation. The tax rate to be paid by retailer and wholesalers is 0.5% on taxable margin. The
increase in the effective rate on permanent differences and other shown above is a function of
those line items increasing in absolute dollars in the year ended January 31, 2010, while the
Companys pre-tax income declined. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended January 31,
2010, the Company recorded a tax benefit related to litigation costs that had been accrued in prior
quarters of the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010. The resulting impact was approximately a $1.6
million benefit to the provision for income taxes.
7. Leases
The Company leases certain of its facilities and operating equipment from outside parties and
from a stockholder/officer. The real estate leases generally have initial lease periods of from 5
to 15 years with renewal options at the discretion of the Company; the equipment leases generally
provide for initial lease terms of three to seven years and provide for a purchase right by the
Company at the end of the lease term at the fair market value of the equipment.
The following is a schedule of future minimum base rental payments required under the
operating leases that have initial non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Party |
|
|
Party |
|
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
23,431 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
$ |
23,638 |
|
2012 |
|
|
23,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,097 |
|
- 17 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
Party |
|
|
Party |
|
|
Total |
|
2013 |
|
|
20,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,138 |
|
2014 |
|
|
18,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,666 |
|
2015 |
|
|
16,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,443 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
55,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
157,423 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
157,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease expense was approximately $19.3 million, $22.6 million and $23.9 million for
the years ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, including approximately $0.2
million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million paid to related parties, respectively.
Certain of our leases are subject to scheduled minimum rent increases or escalation
provisions, the cost of which is recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term.
Tenant improvement allowances, when granted by the lessor, are deferred and amortized as
contra-lease expense over the term of the lease.
8. Share-Based Compensation
The Company has an Incentive Stock Option Plan and a Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
to provide for grants of stock options to various officers, employees and directors, as applicable,
at prices equal to the market value on the date of the grant. The options vest over one to five
year periods (depending on the grant) and expire ten years after the date of grant. The shares
available under the Incentive Stock Option Plan are 3,859,767 and the shares available under the
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan are 600,000. On June 2, 2009, the Company issued seven
non-employee directors 70,000 total options to acquire the Companys stock at $16.93 per share. At
January 31, 2010, the Company had 120,000 options available for grant under the Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan.
The Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan is available to a majority of the employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries, subject to minimum employment conditions and maximum compensation
limitations. At the end of each calendar quarter, employee contributions are used to acquire shares
of common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or
last day of the calendar quarter. During the years ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, the
Company issued 13,316, 21,774 and 27,110 shares of common stock, respectively, to employees
participating in the plan, leaving 1,174,005 shares remaining reserved for future issuance under
the plan as of January 31, 2010.
A summary of the Companys Incentive Stock Option Plan activity during the year ended January
31, 2010 is presented below (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding, beginning of year |
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
$ |
16.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
453 |
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(13.49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year |
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
14.26 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of year |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
17.10 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the years ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Company recognized total
compensation cost for share-based compensation of approximately $2.7 million, $3.2 million and $2.4
million, respectively, and recognized tax benefits related to that compensation cost of
approximately $0.5 million, $0.7 million, and $0.4 million, respectively.
The assumptions used in stock pricing model and valuation information for the years ended
January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
Weighted average risk free interest rate |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Weighted average expected lives in years |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Weighted average volatility |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
59.4 |
% |
- 18 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
Expected dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted
during the period |
|
$ |
9.94 |
|
|
$ |
3.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.77 |
|
Weighted average fair value of options vested during the
period (1) |
|
$ |
8.17 |
|
|
$ |
9.13 |
|
|
$ |
7.59 |
|
Total fair value of options vesting during the period (1) |
|
$ |
2.3 |
million |
|
$ |
2.4 |
million |
|
$ |
2.2 |
million |
Intrinsic value of options exercised during the period |
|
$ |
3.1 |
million |
|
$ |
0.2 |
million |
|
$ |
0.0 |
million |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include pre-IPO options that were valued using the minimum value
option-pricing method. |
The Company used a shortcut method to compute the weighted average expected life for
the stock options granted in the years ended January 31, 2009 and 2010. The shortcut method is an
average based on the vesting period and the contractual term. The Company uses the shortcut method
due to the lack of adequate historical experience or other comparable information. The weighted
average volatility for the years ended January 31, 2009 and 2010 was calculated using the Companys
historical volatility. As of January 31, 2010, the total compensation cost related to non-vested
awards not yet recognized totaled $5.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 3.3 years.
9. Significant Vendors
As shown in the table below, a significant portion of the Companys merchandise purchases for
years ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 were made from six vendors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
Vendor |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
A |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
B |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
C |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
D |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
E |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
F |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
54.4 |
% |
|
|
63.3 |
% |
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Related Party Refinancing Transactions
The Company leases one of its stores from Thomas J. Frank, Jr. Mr. Frank served as the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board until June, 2009. The terms of the
lease were entered into prior to becoming a publicly held company. The lease provides for base
monthly rental payments of $17,235 plus escrows for taxes, insurance and common area maintenance
expenses of increasing monthly amounts based on expenditures by the management company operating
the shopping center of which this store is a part through January 31, 2011. We also have an option
to renew the lease for two additional five-year terms. Mr. Frank received total payments under this
lease of $206,820 in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Based on market lease rates for
comparable retail space in the area, we believe that the terms of this lease are no less favorable
to us than we could have obtained in an arms length transaction at the date of the lease
commencement.
The Company engaged the services of Direct Marketing Solutions, Inc. (DMS), for a substantial
portion of its direct mail advertising. DMS, Inc. is partially owned (less than 50%) by SF Holding
Corp., members of the Stephens family, Jon E. M. Jacoby, and Douglas H. Martin. SF Holding Corp.
and the members of the Stephens family are significant shareholders of the Company, and Messrs.
Jacoby and Martin are members of the Companys Board of Directors. The fees the Company paid to DMS
during the fiscal years ended 2008, 2009 and 2010, amounted to approximately $2.5 million, $4.0
million and $2.4 million, respectively.
11. Benefit Plans
The Company has established a defined contribution 401(k) plan for eligible employees who are
at least 21 years old and have completed at least one-year of service. Employees may contribute up
to 20% of their eligible pretax compensation to the plan. Historically, the Company has matched
100% of the first 3% of the employees contributions and 50% of the next 2% of the employees
contributions.
- 19 -
Effective November 1, 2009, the Company changed its matching contribution to match only 100%
of the first 3% of employees contributions. At its option, the Company may make supplemental
contributions to the Plan, but has not made such contributions in the past three years. The
matching contributions made by the Company totaled $2.1, $1.8 and $1.3 million during the years
ended January 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
12. Contingencies
Legal Proceedings. On November 24, 2009, the Company settled litigation filed against it on
May 28, 2009, by the Texas Attorney General in the Texas State District Court of Harris County,
Texas, alleging that the Company engaged in unlawful and deceptive practices in violation of the
Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act. Under the terms of the settlement with the
Texas Attorney General, it did not admit and continues to deny any wrongdoing. As part of the
settlement agreement, the Company made two cash payments, one in the amount of $2.5 million on
December 17, 2009 and a second payment in the amount of $2.0 million made on February 18, 2010,
both to the Texas Attorney General for distribution to consumers as restitution for claims the
customers have. The Company also paid $250,000 to the Texas Attorney General in attorneys fees,
and agreed to and did donate $100,000 to the University of Houston Law Center for use in its
consumer protection programs. This settlement caps the Companys financial exposure under this
litigation, in connection with the all of the allegations contained in the suit. These costs are
included in Selling, general and administrative costs in the statement of operations for the year
ended January 31, 2010.
The Company is also involved in routine litigation and claims incidental to its business from
time to time, and, as required, has accrued its estimate of the probable costs for the resolution
of these matters. These estimates have been developed in consultation with counsel and are based
upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement
strategies. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular period
could be materially affected by changes in the Companys assumptions or the effectiveness of its
strategies related to these proceedings. However, the results of these proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty, and changes in facts and circumstances could impact the Companys
estimate of reserves for litigation. As of January 31, 2010, the Company has recorded approximately
$2.0 million in litigation reserves, inclusive of the Attorney General settlement, that reflect its
best estimate of what it expects will be required to settle outstanding litigation.
Insurance. Because of its inventory, vehicle fleet and general operations, the Company has
purchased insurance covering a broad variety of potential risks. The Company purchases insurance
policies covering general liability, workers compensation, real property, inventory and employment
practices liability, among others. Additionally, the Company has umbrella policies with an
aggregate limit of $50.0 million. The Company has retained a portion of the risk under these
policies and its group health insurance program. See additional discussion under Note 1. The
Company has a $1.7 million letter of credit outstanding supporting its obligations under the
property and casualty portion of its insurance program.
Repair Service Agreement Obligations. The Company sells repair service agreements under which
it is the obligor for payment of qualifying claims. The Company is responsible for administering
the program, including setting the pricing of the agreements sold and paying the claims. The
pricing is set based on historical claims experience and expectations about future claims. While
the Company is unable to estimate maximum potential claim exposure, it has a history of overall
profitability upon the ultimate resolution of agreements sold. The revenues related to the
agreements sold are deferred at the time of sales and recorded in revenues in the statement of
operations over the life of the agreements. The amounts deferred are reflected on the face of the
consolidated balance sheet in Deferred revenues and allowances, see also Note 1 for additional
discussion.
13. Subsequent Events
As a result of the declines in our profitability beginning in the quarter ended October 31,
2009, due to the slowdown in the economic conditions in the Companys markets, it determined that
there was a reasonable likelihood that it would trigger the default provisions of its credit
facilities. Based on that expectation, the Company began working with its and its VIEs lenders to
amend the covenants in the credit facilities. The Company completed the necessary amendments in
February and March, 2010. The Company and its VIE amended the covenants, among other terms, in
their credit facilities. The revised covenant calculations include both the operating results and
assets and liabilities of the Company and the
- 20 -
Companys VIE, effective January 31, 2010, for all financial covenant calculations. The
completed agreements resulted in the following changes:
|
|
|
Fixed charge coverage ratio requirement reduced to 1.1 to 1.0 for the twelve month
periods ended January 31, 2010, and April 30, 2010, before returning to a requirement
of 1.3 to 1.0 beginning with the quarter ending July 31, 2010, |
|
|
|
The leverage ratio was replaced with a maximum total liabilities to tangible net
worth requirement, beginning as of January 31, 2010, with a required maximum of 2.00 to
1.00 at January 31, 2010, declining to 1.75 to 1.00 as of July 31, 2010 and then to
1.50 to 1.00 as of April 30, 2011 and each fiscal quarter thereafter, |
|
|
|
The interest rate on our revolving credit facility increased by 100 basis points to
LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 325 basis points to 375 basis points, |
|
|
|
We will be required to pay a fee, as servicer of the VIEs receivables, equal to the
following rates multiplied times the total available borrowing commitment under the
VIEs revolving credit facility on the dates shown: |
|
o |
|
50 basis points on May 1, 2010, |
|
|
o |
|
100 basis points on August 1, 2010, |
|
|
o |
|
110 basis points on November 1, 2010, |
|
|
o |
|
115 basis points on February 1, 2011, |
|
|
o |
|
115 basis point on May 1, 2011, and |
|
|
o |
|
123 basis points on August 1, 2011, |
|
|
|
The total available commitments under the VIEs revolving credit facility will be
reduced from the current level of $200 million to $170 million in April 2010 and then
to $130 million in April 2011, |
|
|
|
The Company will use the proceeds from any capital raising activity to further
reduce the commitments and debt outstanding under the VIEs debt facilities, |
|
|
|
The maturity date on the VIEs revolving credit facility was reduced from September
2012 to August 2011, and |
|
|
|
The Company may be required to complete certain additional tasks as servicer of the
VIEs receivables, so long as commitments remain outstanding under the VIEs revolving
credit facility. |
The Company expects, based on current facts and circumstances, that it will be in compliance
with the above covenants through fiscal 2011.
14. Segment Reporting
Financial information by segment is presented in the following tables for fiscal years ended
January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
667,401 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
667,401 |
|
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) (a) |
|
|
44,119 |
|
|
|
(10,847 |
) |
|
|
33,272 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
22,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
733,635 |
|
|
|
(10,847 |
) |
|
|
722,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
152,265 |
|
|
|
152,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 21 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Total |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
734,167 |
|
|
|
141,418 |
|
|
|
875,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods and parts sold, including
warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
544,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544,700 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense (b) |
|
|
180,911 |
|
|
|
61,019 |
|
|
|
241,930 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,288 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
14,012 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
36,746 |
|
|
|
36,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
737,996 |
|
|
|
109,106 |
|
|
|
847,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(3,829 |
) |
|
|
32,312 |
|
|
|
28,483 |
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
(3,706 |
) |
|
$ |
11,741 |
|
|
$ |
8,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
195,648 |
|
|
$ |
696,818 |
|
|
$ |
892,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions |
|
$ |
9,808 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
10,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
743,729 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
743,729 |
|
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) (a) |
|
|
50,778 |
|
|
|
(10,579 |
) |
|
|
40,199 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
815,628 |
|
|
|
(10,579 |
) |
|
|
805,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
152,331 |
|
|
|
154,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
817,789 |
|
|
|
141,752 |
|
|
|
959,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods and parts sold, including
warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
590,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590,061 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense (b) |
|
|
182,703 |
|
|
|
58,928 |
|
|
|
241,631 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,218 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
12,541 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
27,792 |
|
|
|
27,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
784,142 |
|
|
|
88,043 |
|
|
|
872,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
33,647 |
|
|
|
53,709 |
|
|
|
87,356 |
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,597 |
|
|
|
23,597 |
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income before income taxes |
|
$ |
33,530 |
|
|
$ |
30,112 |
|
|
$ |
63,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
234,672 |
|
|
$ |
722,894 |
|
|
$ |
957,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions |
|
$ |
17,446 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
17,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 22 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
671,571 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
671,571 |
|
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) (a) |
|
|
44,735 |
|
|
|
(8,311 |
) |
|
|
36,424 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
739,303 |
|
|
|
(8,311 |
) |
|
|
730,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
138,588 |
|
|
|
139,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
740,253 |
|
|
|
130,277 |
|
|
|
870,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods and parts sold, including
warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
517,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517,166 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense (b) |
|
|
179,354 |
|
|
|
54,279 |
|
|
|
233,633 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,331 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
12,128 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
19,275 |
|
|
|
19,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
708,041 |
|
|
|
74,351 |
|
|
|
782,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
32,212 |
|
|
|
55,926 |
|
|
|
88,138 |
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,839 |
|
|
|
24,839 |
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income before income taxes |
|
$ |
33,155 |
|
|
$ |
31,087 |
|
|
$ |
64,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
200,686 |
|
|
$ |
634,813 |
|
|
$ |
835,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions |
|
$ |
17,936 |
|
|
$ |
1,019 |
|
|
$ |
18,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Retail repair service agreement commissions exclude repair service agreement cancellations
that are the result of consumer credit account charge-offs. These amounts are reflected in repair
service agreement commissions for the credit segment. |
|
(b) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses include the direct expenses of the retail and
credit operations, allocated overhead expenses and a charge to the credit segment to reimburse the
retail segment for expenses it incurs related to occupancy, personnel, advertising and other direct
costs of the retail segment which benefit the credit operations by sourcing credit customers and
collecting payments. The reimbursement received by the retail segment from the credit segment is
estimated using an annual rate of 2.5% times the average portfolio balance for each applicable
period. The amount of overhead allocated to each segment was approximately $7.2 million, $9.4
million and $9.0 million for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The amount of reimbursement made to the retail segment by the credit segment was approximately
$18.6 million, $17.4 million and $15.2 million for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively. |
- 23 -