SEC Filing | Conn's, Inc.

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

DEFR14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. 1)

Filed by the Registrant: ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:


☐		Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐		Confidential, for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☐		Definitive Proxy Statement

☒		Definitive Additional Materials

☐		Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12

CONN’S, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):



☒	No fee required.

☐	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

	1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	5)	Total fee paid:

☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

	1)	Amount Previously Paid:
	2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	3)	Filing Party:
	4)	Date Filed:

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The following revised definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) amends and restates, in its entirety, the definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed by Conn’s, Inc. (the “Company”) on April 17, 2017 (the “Original Proxy Statement”). The sole purpose of this amendment and restatement is to correct a ministerial calculation error in the proportion of contingent and non-contingent grants comprising of the restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) issued to executives of the Company in February 2017 pursuant to special equity grants in the amount of 1,014,571 shares in the aggregate (the “Special Grant”). The shares awarded under the Special Grant in excess of the number of shares then available for issuance were made contingent upon shareholder approval of an amendment to the Company’s 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Due to a ministerial calculation error, the proportion of contingent PSUs and RSUs awarded under the Special Grant was incorrectly stated in the Original Proxy Statement to indicate an excess of contingent RSUs and PSUs. Notwithstanding the correction of this calculation error, neither the aggregate number of PSUs and RSUs awarded under the Special Grant nor the text of Proposal Five, Approval of Amendment to the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, has changed from the number and text set forth in the Original Proxy Statement.

Shareholders who have already properly executed a proxy card or voted over the Internet or by telephone and who would like to change their vote may revoke their proxy before it is voted at the 2017 annual meeting by submitting a proxy bearing a later date or over the Internet or by telephone, or by attending the 2017 annual meeting in person and casting a ballot, or as otherwise described in the Proxy Statement.

CONN’S, INC.

NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held May 31, 2017

Location Information

The Westin at The Woodlands

Edgewater Ballroom B

2 Waterway Square Place

The Woodlands, Texas 77380

To the Stockholders of Conn’s, Inc.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders of Conn’s, Inc. will be held on Wednesday, May 31, 2017, at The Westin at The Woodlands, Edgewater Ballroom B, 2 Waterway Square Place, The Woodlands, Texas, 77380, commencing at 12:00 P.M., Central Daylight Time, for the following purposes:

to elect the eight directors nominated by our Board of Directors and named in this proxy statement;

to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2018;

to hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers;

to hold a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers;

to approve the adoption of the Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and

to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 5, 2017 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders or any postponement or adjournment thereof. A list of such stockholders, arranged in alphabetical order and showing the address of and the number of shares registered in the name of each such stockholder, will be available for examination by any stockholder for any purpose relating to the meeting during ordinary business hours for a period of at least ten days prior to the meeting at our principal executive offices located at 4055 Technology Forest Blvd., Suite 210, The Woodlands, Texas 77381. If you plan on attending in person, you will need to provide proof of stock ownership, such as an account or brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date, and a form of valid government-issued picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport.

We are pleased to take advantage of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rule that allows companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders over the Internet. As a result, on or about April 12, 2017, we are mailing to our stockholders, other than those who previously requested electronic or paper delivery of proxy materials, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017. The Notice contains instructions on how to access those documents over the Internet. The Notice also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this proxy statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017, and a form of proxy card or voting instruction card. It is very important that your shares are represented and voted at the meeting. As explained in further detail in the Notice, your shares may be voted via a toll-free telephone number, on the Internet, or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. Your proxy card will not be used if you are present at the meeting and prefer to vote in person, or if you revoke your proxy.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Mark L. Prior

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

April 12, 2017

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 31, 2017

The Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017 are available free of charge on our website at www.conns.com, at www.proxyvote.com, and at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

PROXY STATEMENT

2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS


Date:		May 31, 2017

Time:		12:00 P.M., Central Daylight Time

Location of Meeting:		Conn’s, Inc. (“we,” “us” or the “Company”) The Westin at The Woodlands Edgewater Ballroom B 2 Waterway Square Place The Woodlands, Texas 77380

Record Date and Number of Votes:		April 5, 2017. Holders of our Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”) are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock they owned as of the close of business on April 5, 2017. You may not cumulate votes.

Agenda:		1. To elect the eight directors nominated by our Board of Directors and named in this proxy statement; 2. To ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2018 (“fiscal 2018”); 3. To hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers; 4. To hold a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers; 5. To approve the adoption of the Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and 6. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Proxies:		Unless you tell us on the form of proxy to vote differently, the named proxies will vote signed returned proxies: 1. “FOR” the election of the eight directors nominated by the Board of Directors and named in this proxy statement; 2. “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018; 3. “FOR” the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers; 4. “FOR” a frequency of ONE YEAR as the frequency with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers; and 5. “FOR” the adoption of the Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The proxy holders will use their discretion on other matters. If a nominee for the Board of Directors cannot serve as a director, the proxy holders will vote for a person whom they believe will carry on our present policies.

Proxies Solicited By:		The board of directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”).

Distribution Date:		The Notice or the proxy materials, including this proxy statement, proxy card or voting instruction card and our Annual Report on Form 10-K, are being distributed and made available on or about April 12, 2017.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE PROMPTLY.

Prompt return of your proxy will help reduce the costs to the Company of re-solicitation.

Table of Contents


GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS			1

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS			6

PROPOSAL TWO: RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM			8

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT			9

PROPOSAL THREE: ADVISORY VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS			10

PROPOSAL FOUR: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS			11

BOARD OF DIRECTORS			12

BOARD OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES FOR 2017 – 2018:			12

NOMINATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES			14

INDEPENDENT BOARD COMPOSITION			15

BOARD MEETINGS			15

POLICY REGARDING DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS			15

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD			15

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS			17

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS			20

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY			20

LEADERSHIP CHANGES AND BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS			20

FISCAL 2017 PAY FOR PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS			22

FISCAL 2017 DISCRETIONARY BONUSES			22

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES			22

DETERMINING COMPENSATION			24

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION			25

CEO PERFORMANCE STOCK OPTION GRANT AND MODIFICATION OF INITIAL NEW HIRE EQUITY GRANT VESTING SCHEDULE			29

FISCAL 2018 SPECIAL EQUITY AWARDS			30

TIMING OF EQUITY GRANTS			30

SETTLEMENT OF FISCAL 2016 PERFORMANCE-BASED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS			30



PRESIDENT, CEO AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD COMPENSATION			30

NEWLY APPOINTED CFO COMPENSATION			31

TRANSITION AGREEMENT WITH MR. THOMAS MORAN			32

HEALTH, RETIREMENT, PERQUISITES AND OTHER BENEFITS			32

ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			32

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES			32

PROHIBITION ON HEDGING AND PLEDGING			33

OTHER COMPENSATION			33

EMPLOYMENT AND RELATED AGREEMENTS			33

TAX IMPLICATIONS OF OUR COMPENSATION POLICIES			33

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT			33

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE			34

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS			36

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2017			37

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED			38

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS			39

EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS			39

FISCAL 2017 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL			41

INDEMNIFICATION ARRANGEMENTS			42

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			43

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES			43

LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR			43

SEPARATION OF CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER			44

RISK OVERSIGHT			44

STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD			44

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS			45

BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION			45

EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS			46



AMENDED AND RESTATED 2003 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN			46

2011 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN			47

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN			47

2003 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN			47

2011 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN			47

2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN			47

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS			48

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS			48

PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN			52

KEY PLAN FEATURES			53

NUMBER OF SHARES REQUESTED			54

ELIGIBLE PARTICIPANTS			56

PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS			56

ADMINISTRATION OF THE AMENDED 2016 PLAN			57

AMENDMENT OF THE 2016 PLAN			57

AWARDS GRANTED UNDER 2016 PLAN			58

FEDERAL TAX EFFECTS OF PARTICIPATION IN THE AMENDED 2016 PLAN			58

NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTIONS; SARS			58

SPECIAL EQUITY AWARDS IN FISCAL 2018			61

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS			63

REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS			63

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS			63

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE			63

STOCKHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME LAST NAME AND ADDRESS			63

FORM OF PROXY

GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

What constitutes a quorum? What is the Record Date? How many shares are outstanding?

The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock (the “Common Stock”) entitled to vote at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2017 annual meeting” or the “meeting”), represented in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the meeting. However, if a quorum is not present or represented at the meeting, the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, have the power to adjourn the meeting, without notice, other than by announcement at the meeting, until a quorum is present or represented. At any such adjourned meeting at which a quorum is present or represented, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the original meeting.

On April 5, 2017, the “Record Date,” there were 30,980,096 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, meaning that 15,490,049 shares of our Common Stock must be present in person or by proxy to have a quorum.

What matters will be voted on at the 2017 annual meeting?

The following matters will be voted on at the 2017 annual meeting:

the election of eight directors nominated to the Board of Directors;

a proposal to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018;

a non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers;

a non-binding advisory resolution on the frequency of holding the non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers;

the adoption of the Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and

such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:

FOR the election of the eight directors nominated by the Board of Directors and named in this proxy statement.

FOR the ratification of the appointment by the Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018.

FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement.

FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of a frequency of ONE YEAR as the frequency with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers.

FOR the adoption of the Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

What is the effect of a broker non-vote?

Brokers or other nominees who hold shares of our Common Stock for a beneficial owner only have the discretion to vote on routine proposals when they have not received voting directions from the beneficial owner at least ten days prior to the 2017 annual meeting. Rule 452 of the New York Stock Exchange, which governs all brokers (including those holding NASDAQ-listed securities), provides that a broker or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner may generally vote on routine matters, but not non-routine matters, without receiving voting instructions. Other than with respect to the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal Two), which is considered routine, all of the other proposals are considered non-routine matters. Please provide instructions to your broker or nominee on how to vote your shares. If you do not provide such voting instructions to your broker, they will not be able to vote for Proposals One, Three, Four or Five for you and a

“broker non-vote” will result. Shares that constitute broker non-votes will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum, but will only be considered entitled to vote on the proposal to ratify the appointment by the audit committee of our Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) of our independent registered public accounting firm and any other routine matters that may properly come before the meeting. To minimize the number of broker non-votes and to ensure that your voice is heard in the election of directors and the other matters to be voted on at the 2017 annual meeting, we encourage you to provide voting instructions to the broker or other organization that holds your shares by carefully following the instructions in the Notice.

What vote is required to approve the proposals?

Provided a quorum exists, the following votes are required for each proposal:

Proposal One: Election of Directors – To be elected, each director must receive a majority of the votes cast with respect to the director. For purposes of this vote, a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a director’s election exceeds the number of shares voted “against” that director’s election. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.

Proposal Two: Ratify the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – An affirmative vote of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter at the meeting is required to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.

Proposal Three: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation – An affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter at the meeting is required to give advisory (non-binding) approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board of Directors or on us; however, the Board of Directors and we will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.

Proposal Four: Advisory Vote on Frequency of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation – The frequency (one, two or three years) of the advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers receiving the greatest number of votes will be the recommended frequency that stockholders approve. Because your vote for this proposal is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board of Directors or on us; however, the Board of Directors and we will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding the frequency of the advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.

Proposal Five: Adoption of the Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan – An affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter at the meeting is required for the adoption of the Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 5, 2017, the Record Date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournments of the meeting. Each share of Common Stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote per share.

What will happen if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted, but do submit a proxy?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record and you submit a proxy, but you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted:

•

FOR the election of the eight directors nominated by our Board of Directors and named in this proxy statement;

•

FOR the ratification of the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018;

•

FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement;

•

FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of a frequency of ONE YEAR as the frequency with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers; and

•

FOR the adoption of the Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide voting instructions to the broker or other nominee that holds your shares, the broker or other nominee will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on a particular proposal, and may not be able to vote on all proposals presented for a vote at the annual meeting.

What will happen if I do not vote my shares?

Stockholders of Record. If you are the stockholder of record and you do not vote by proxy card, by telephone, by the Internet or in person at the 2017 annual meeting, your shares will not be voted at the 2017 annual meeting. For each of the proposals, if you are not present at the meeting in person or by proxy, the failure to vote will not affect the outcome of the proposal.

Beneficial Owners. If you are the beneficial owner of shares, your broker or nominee may vote your shares only on those proposals on which it has discretion to vote. See “What is the effect of a broker non-vote?” for more information.

How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by any of the following methods:

•

By Mail. You may submit your vote by completing, signing and dating your proxy card received and returning it in the prepaid envelope so that it is received no later than May 30, 2017.

•

By Internet or Telephone. You may vote your shares by Internet or telephone, by following the instructions in your Notice. If you vote by Internet or telephone, you should not return your proxy card. These votes must be received by 11:59 P.M., Eastern Time, on May 30, 2017.

•

In person at the Annual Meeting. You may vote your shares in person at the 2017 annual meeting. Proxy cards will be available for you at the meeting, or you may bring the one provided you, and deliver the completed and executed card to the inspector of election at the 2017 annual meeting.

Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner of your shares, you should receive a Notice or voting instructions from the broker or nominee holding your shares. You should follow the instructions provided to you by your broker in order to properly advise them of your voting instructions. Shares held beneficially may be voted at the 2017 annual meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from your broker or nominee giving you the right to vote, and presenting that legal proxy together with your vote to the inspector of election at the 2017 annual meeting.

Can I revoke or change my proxy?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the 2017 annual meeting by:

•

signing and returning a new proxy card at a later date;

•

submitting a vote by telephone or the Internet at a later date;

•

attending the 2017 annual meeting and voting in person; or

•

delivering a written revocation to our Corporate Secretary at the address of our principal executive offices provided to you in this proxy statement or to Broadridge Financial Services, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, Attn: Vote Processing.

Beneficial Owners. If you are the beneficial owner of your shares, you must contact your broker or nominee holding your shares, and follow their instructions for revocation or changing your proxy.

Your attendance at the 2017 annual meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at the 2017 annual meeting.

Who will count the votes?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has been engaged as our independent agent to receive and tabulate our stockholder votes, and will act as our independent inspector of election who will certify the election results and perform any other acts required by the Delaware General Corporation Law.

How are stockholder proposals included in the proposals submitted to stockholders for voting? How is any other business voted on by stockholders?

Stockholders have the right to present proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement for consideration at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders. To be considered at our next annual meeting, you must submit your proposals, in addition to meeting other legal requirements, within the appropriate time periods, as set forth below. If you want to make a proposal for consideration at our 2018 annual meeting and have it included in the Company’s proxy materials relating to our 2018 annual meeting, we must receive your proposal at our principal executive office by no later than December 15, 2017, and such proposal must otherwise comply with Rule 14a-8 (“Rule 14a-8”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and other applicable SEC rules. If you want to make a proposal or nominate a director for consideration at our 2018 annual meeting without having the proposal included in the Company’s proxy materials, you must comply with the then-current advanced notice provisions and other requirements set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”). Under our current Bylaws, our Corporate Secretary must receive such proposals for possible consideration at our 2018 annual meeting at our principal executive offices no earlier than December 15, 2017 and no later than January 14, 2018. However, if the date of the 2018 annual meeting changes by more than 30 days from the first anniversary date of this year’s meeting, we will then provide notice of the new date of the 2018 annual meeting in our earliest possible quarterly report on Form 10-Q. If we do not receive your proposal or nomination by the appropriate deadline, then it may not be brought before the 2018 annual meeting even if it meets the other proposal or nomination requirements.

We do not intend to bring any business before the 2017 annual meeting other than the matters described in this proxy statement and have not been informed of any matters or proposals that may be presented at the meeting by stockholders. If, however, any other business should properly arise and be properly submitted for a vote at the 2017 annual meeting, the persons appointed in the proxy have discretionary authority to vote in accordance with their best judgment.

Who is paying the cost of solicitation of proxies?

We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, solicitation may be made by our directors, officers and employees by other means, including telephone, e-mail or in person. No special compensation will be paid to directors, officers or employees for the solicitation of proxies. To solicit proxies, we may also request the assistance of banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees or fiduciaries, and, upon request, will reimburse such organizations or individuals for their reasonable expenses in forwarding the Notice and other soliciting materials to beneficial owners and in obtaining authorization for the execution of proxies.

Do we provide for Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we provide access to the proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our stockholders owning shares of our Common Stock on or about April 12, 2017. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. The Notice also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this proxy statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017 (“fiscal 2017”), and a form of proxy card or voting instruction card. In addition, the Notice will provide stockholders with instructions on how to request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or by e-mail on an ongoing basis. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or by e-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates such election. We encourage stockholders to take advantage

of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact of the 2017 annual meeting and lower the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail message each successive year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting website.

Our proxy materials are also available free of charge on our website at www.conns.com, at www.proxyvote.com, and at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

How can I find the result of the voting at the 2017 annual meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the 2017 annual meeting. Final results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K or in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ending April 30, 2017, which will be posted on our website at www.conns.com, under “Investor Relations.”

PROPOSALS FOR STOCKHOLDER ACTION

PROPOSAL ONE:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Number of Directors to be Elected

Our Board currently consists of ten director positions and we currently have eight members on our Board. We intend for the two vacancies to remain until our Board of Directors desires to fill such vacancies or reduce the size of the Board. At this time the Board of Directors believes that eight is the appropriate number of directors and does not intend to fill the two director vacancies. The eight directors to be elected at the 2017 annual meeting will hold office until the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified or earlier upon their death, resignation or removal. You may not vote for a greater number of directors than those nominated.

Criteria for Nomination to the Board of Directors. Those persons nominated to our Board of Directors are selected by the nominating and corporate governance committee of our Board (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”) in accordance with the committee’s charter, our certificate of incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) and Bylaws, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the criteria determined by the Board for our director candidates. In considering the nomination of the directors identified below to serve until the 2018 annual meeting, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee sought and considered individuals with strong personal reputations and experience in business and other areas that are relevant and important to the financing, strategy and operations of the Company, as well as financial expertise to qualify as a “financial expert” for our Audit Committee. Each nominee for election as a director at the 2017 annual meeting holds or has held senior executive positions in organizations providing such background and expertise, and each has the necessary business and financial experience sought by the Company in those areas, including strategic and financial planning, public company financing and reporting, compliance, risk management and leadership. Each of the director nominees also has experience of serving on boards or in senior executive management of publicly held companies or governmental services requiring strong business and leadership acumen and implementation.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considered and believes that each of the director nominees has valuable personal and business attributes that have and will continue to be valuable to the Company in their advice and guidance to executive management of the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account in its consideration diversity in range of backgrounds, perspectives and experience of the individuals it recommends for nomination to our Board of Directors. Information on the specific experience of each nominee can be found under the caption “Board of Directors – Board of Director Nominees for 2017 – 2018.”

Board Nominees

Our Board of Directors met in March 2017 and considered the candidates for nomination for election to the Board at the 2017 annual meeting. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, consisting of three independent members of the current Board of Directors, recommended that the full Board nominate the following individuals for re-election to the Board of Directors at the 2017 annual meeting.

In making these recommendations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each of the nominees as described above and the requirements and qualifications discussed under “Board of Directors – Nomination Policies and Procedures.” Based on this recommendation, our Board of Directors has nominated the following individuals to be elected by the stockholders at the 2017 annual meeting.

Name

Position

Age

Term of Office

Committee Membership

James H. Haworth

Independent Director

March 2016 – Current

Compensation Committee

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee


Name	Position	Age		Term of Office	Committee Membership
Kelly M. Malson	Independent Director		46	August 2012 – Current	Audit Committee (Chair) (Financial Expert) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Bob L. Martin	Lead Independent Director		68	September 2003 – Current	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) Compensation Committee (Chair)

Douglas H. Martin	Director		63	February 2003 – Current	Credit Risk and Compliance Committee

Norman L. Miller	President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board		56	September 2015 – Current	None

William E. Saunders, Jr.	Independent Director		43	August 2014 – Current	Audit Committee (Financial Expert) Credit Risk and Compliance Committee (Chair)

William (David) Schofman	Independent Director		45	May 2012 – Current	Compensation Committee

Oded Shein	Independent Director		55	March 2016 – Current	Audit Committee (Financial Expert) Credit Risk and Compliance Committee

Each director nominee currently serves as a member of the Board, having been elected at our 2016 annual meeting and served on the Board of Directors throughout fiscal 2017.

Those nominees identified in the table above as “independent director” have been determined by our Board to be independent under NASDAQ rules. All nominees have consented to serve as directors. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to act as a director. In the event any nominated director is unable to stand for election, the Board of Directors may either reduce the size of the Board or designate a substitute.

For biographical information and the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each director nominee that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board of Directors considered to determine that such nominee should serve as one of our directors, please refer to the section captioned “Board of Directors – Board of Director Nominees for 2017 – 2018,” below.

Each director nominee will be elected by the vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director nominee. This means the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director nominee (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes). Each director nominee has tendered his or her resignation from the Board, which shall be effective only in the event that (i) the votes cast “for” such director nominee are equal to or less than 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director nominee, and (ii) the Board of Directors accepts such resignation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors whether to accept any resignation in the event any director nominee fails to receive over 50% of the votes cast “for” such director nominee. The Board of Directors will then consider the recommendation and publicly disclose its decision within 90 days after the certification of the election results.

The Board of Directors Recommends That You Vote “FOR” the Election Of Each Of The Eight Board Nominees.

PROPOSAL TWO:

RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Ernst & Young LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2017. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018. Our Board of Directors has further directed that we submit the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the 2017 annual meeting. Stockholder ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise. However, the Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. The Audit Committee believes it to be in the best interests of our stockholders to retain Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Ernst & Young LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests and those of our stockholders. The Audit Committee annually reviews the performance of our independent public accountants and the fees charged for their services. The Audit Committee anticipates, from time to time, obtaining competitive proposals from other independent public accounting firms for our annual audit. Based upon the Audit Committee’s analysis of this information, we will determine which independent public accounting firm to engage to perform our annual audit each year. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will attend the 2017 annual meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions that may be asked by stockholders. These representatives will also have an opportunity to make a statement at the meeting if they desire to do so.

The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee Recommend That You Vote “FOR” The Ratification Of Ernst & Young LLP As Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Principal Accounting Firm Fees and Services

Fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP to the Company during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2017 and 2016 in each of the following categories, including related expenses, are:


	Fiscal Years Ended January 31,
	2017		2016
Audit	$	1,205,355	$	1,255,451
Audit-Related Fees	$	131,039	$	95,000
Tax Fees		—	$	66,140
All Other Fees		—		—

Audit fees: Consists of fees for professional services rendered for the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including the audit of internal control over financial reporting, reviews of the interim financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and work performed to support the Company’s debt and equity issuances, including SEC registration statements and filings, the issuance of consents and in connection with responses to SEC comment letters.

Audit-related fees: Fees for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 consist of work performed to support the Company’s securitization transactions.

Tax fees: Consists of fees billed for professional services related to tax compliance, tax advice, and other tax planning services and advice. There were none of these services performed in fiscal 2017.

All Other Fees: Consists of fees billed for all other services and are unrelated to specific audit or audit-related services described above. There were none of these services performed in fiscal 2016 or fiscal 2017.

Our Audit Committee charter requires pre-approval of all services to be rendered by our independent auditors. All of the audit, audit-related fees, tax fees, and all other fees were approved by our Audit Committee for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2017 and 2016. The Audit Committee determined that no services rendered by our outside auditors during fiscal 2017 were prohibited under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, the Audit Committee has considered whether Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of services, other than services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and reviews of our financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q during fiscal 2017, is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence and has determined that such services rendered met the requirements of independence under applicable SEC rules.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee

Our Board of Directors established the Audit Committee to be responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent auditors and to oversee our (i) financial reporting process; (ii) internal audits, internal control policies and procedures; (iii) implementation and compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 requirements and authorities; and (iv) financial, tax, and risk management policies. The Audit Committee is composed of three independent, non-employee directors and operates under a written charter, a copy of which is published on our website at www.conns.com under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance.” The Audit Committee has prepared the following report on its activities with respect to our financial statements for fiscal 2017.

Review and Discussion

Management is responsible for our financial reporting process (including our system of internal controls) and for the preparation of Conn’s, Inc.’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for auditing those financial statements and for attesting to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. It is the Audit Committee’s responsibility to monitor and review these processes. The members of the Audit Committee are not employees of the Company and do not represent themselves to be, or to serve as, accountants or auditors by profession or experts in the field of accounting or auditing.

In connection with the preparation of our audited financial statements for fiscal 2017, the Audit Committee:

•

reviewed and discussed our Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our audited consolidated financial statements and Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting for fiscal 2017, with management;

•

discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by auditing standards, including Auditing Standard No. 16, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”); and

•

received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB concerning independence, and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence, including whether Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of non-audit services to the Company is compatible with the auditors’ independence.

The Audit Committee meets separately with our independent auditors to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal controls and the overall quality of our financial reporting.

Recommendation

Based on the review and discussion referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017, for filing with the SEC.

AUDIT COMMITTEE:

Kelly M. Malson, Chair

William E. Saunders, Jr.

Oded Shein

PROPOSAL THREE:

ADVISORY VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION

OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enables our stockholders to vote to approve or disapprove, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation of our named executive officers and this vote is provided as required pursuant to section 14A of the Exchange Act. At our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 24, 2011, our stockholders recommended in an advisory vote that we hold the advisory vote for approval of the compensation of our named executive officers annually. Our Board of Directors has agreed with this advisory vote, and has determined to hold this vote annually. At our 2016 annual meeting, approximately 99% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory resolution on our executive compensation.

As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, our compensation program for our named executive officers is designed to (i) motivate and reward performance that increases our stockholder value, including individual measured goals and objectives, (ii) attract and retain executive talent by offering competitive compensation opportunities, and (iii) build and encourage ownership of shares of our Common Stock. Toward these goals, our executive compensation program has been designed and administered to reward our named executive officers based on our financial and operating performance, their individual performance, and to align their interests with those of our stockholders. In addition, our executive compensation program is designed to encourage the long-term commitment of our named executive officers to the Company. We believe that our executive compensation program, which primarily consists of a base salary, an annual Company performance-based cash bonus opportunity, and time- and performance-based equity awards, promotes these objectives. Please read the section captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a discussion of these objectives, the determination of and the elements of compensation and awards for our executive officers, as well as the elements paid and awarded during our fiscal year ended January 31, 2017.

In applying these objectives, the compensation committee of our Board of Directors (“Compensation Committee”) relied upon:

•

input and recommendations received from our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer regarding the performance of each executive officer (other than the Chief Executive Officer), each of whose performance is analyzed by the Compensation Committee, the documentation provided to support the attainment by individual executive officers of their respective goals and objectives, and areas of responsibilities and expectations for future performance and goal attainment;

•

publicly available information with respect to the executive compensation practices of certain public companies in our industry and peer groups;

•

the analysis and recommendations regarding our compensation programs for our executive officers composed by Frederic W. Cook & Co., the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant; and

•

the knowledge of the individual members of the Compensation Committee of industry compensation practices and programs.

For the reasons discussed above, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion contained in this proxy statement, is hereby APPROVED on a non-binding, advisory basis.”

While the resolution is non-binding, the Board of Directors values the opinions that stockholders express in their votes and in any additional dialogue. It will consider the outcome of the vote and those opinions when making future compensation decisions. To the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officers’ compensation, the Compensation Committee will consider our stockholders’ advisory vote, and evaluate whether, and to what extent, any actions are necessary to address our named executive officers’ compensation program.

The Board of Directors Recommends That You Vote “FOR” The Approval, On A Non-Binding Basis, of The Compensation Of Our Named Executive Officers.

PROPOSAL FOUR:

ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF AN

ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION

OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Dodd-Frank Act enables our stockholders to indicate, every six years, how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, such as Proposal Three presented for vote to the stockholders in this proxy statement, and this vote is being provided as required pursuant to section 14A of the Exchange Act. By voting on this Proposal Four, stockholders may indicate their preference for an advisory vote on named executive officers’ compensation once every one, two or three years.

At the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders voted, in a non-binding advisory capacity, to hold an annual advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers. After discussion and consideration of such results, our Board determined to hold an advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers annually, and has held such an advisory vote at every annual meeting of stockholders since the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders.

After discussions and consideration of this Proposal Four, our Board has determined that an advisory vote on our named executive officers’ compensation should occur every year in order that our Company receives the opinions of our stockholders in a timely manner on a regular basis. This annual vote would enable our Board to consider annually the views of our stockholders and to determine whether our Company’s compensation package should be adjusted to reflect those opinions.

You may cast your vote for one, two or three years or abstain from voting. The option receiving the highest number of votes will be the frequency requested by our stockholders in this advisory vote. However, since the vote is advisory, our Board may decide, in its opinion, that it is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders to hold the advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option receiving the most votes from our stockholders.

The Board of Directors Recommends That You Vote “FOR” The Option of Every Year As Frequency With Which Stockholders Are Provided An Advisory Vote on Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Board of Director Nominees for 2017 – 2018:

Norman L. Miller was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer, and to our Board of Directors, effective September 7, 2015. Mr. Miller was appointed as our Chairman of the Board in May 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Miller most recently served as the Senior Vice President and President, Automotive at Sears Holdings, which operates over 700 Sears Auto Center locations. Previously, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of DFC Global Corp (formerly Dollar Financial Corp, NASDAQ: DLLR) from 2007 to 2014. Prior to his employment at DFC Global Corp, Mr. Miller served as Group President, Sports and Entertainment unit at ARAMARK, where he worked for a decade. He was named to the role after serving as the President of ARAMARK’s Correctional Services unit from 2002 to 2003. Mr. Miller’s career also includes nine years with Nestle, Kraft General Foods and PepsiCo, serving in management positions in sales, marketing and operations. Mr. Miller received a Bachelor’s of Science degree from the United States Military Academy at West Point.

Mr. Miller has extensive financial knowledge and provides valuable guidance to our Board of Directors in overseeing various aspects of our operations. In addition, his prior experience as an executive of Sears Holdings and DFC Global Corp provides valuable experience from both the retail and credit operations perspective. His service to our Company as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President provides Mr. Miller with additional and particular knowledge of our Company that he brings to our Board of Directors.

Bob L. Martin has served as a director since September 2003, and was appointed as our Lead Independent Director in August 2012. Mr. Martin was elected as an Operating Partner of The Stephens Group LLC, a family-owned investment company in March 2012, and currently holds such position. Mr. Martin is also the Chief Executive Officer (part-time) of Mcon Management Services, Ltd., a consulting company since 2002. He was previously a consultant to that entity. Mr. Martin has over 35 years of retailing and merchandising experience. Prior to retiring from the retail industry in 1999, he headed the international operations of Wal-Mart International, Inc. for 15 years. From 1968 to 1983, Mr. Martin was responsible for technology services for Dillard’s, Inc. Mr. Martin has also served as a director of Dillard’s, Inc., Sabre Holdings Corporation, Furniture Brands International and Guitar Center, Incorporated. Mr. Martin currently serves on the board of directors of Gap, Inc. He has experience as chairman of a corporate governance and compensation committee, and has been a member of an audit committee, in each case, of publicly held companies. Mr. Martin attended South Texas University and holds an Honorary Doctorate degree from Southwest Baptist University.

Mr. Martin was selected to serve on our Board of Directors due to his extensive experience in information technology and the retail industry, as well as his service and experience on a host of other public company boards. Mr. Martin’s experiences contribute to our Board of Directors’ understanding of innovations and issues affecting information technologies and retail strategies in our industry and marketplace. Mr. Martin is the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee.

There is no relation between Mr. Bob Martin and Mr. Doug Martin.

Kelly M. Malson was appointed as a director in August 2012 and chair of the Audit Committee effective November 26, 2012. Ms. Malson was also appointed to the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in December 2015. Ms. Malson served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of World Acceptance Corporation from May 2009 until stepping down from those positions in December 2013. She remained employed by World Acceptance Corporation from December 2013 until her retirement in February 2014. Prior to that, she held the titles of Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2006 until May 2009 and Vice President of Internal Audit from September 2005 to March 2006 at World Acceptance Corporation. Ms. Malson served as Finance Compliance Manager for ITRON, Inc., IEM Unit from 2004 to 2005. Prior to 2004, she served in various positions with KPMG, LLP and Arthur Andersen LLP. Ms. Malson obtained her Bachelor’s Degree in Accountancy from Southern Illinois University in 1993.

Ms. Malson was selected to serve on our Board because of her extensive experience in the financial industry, her executive positions at World Acceptance Corporation, a consumer finance business, and her substantive knowledge about the variety of issues related to our business.

Douglas H. Martin served as a director of the predecessor to the Company beginning in 1998, and was appointed as one of our directors in February 2003. Mr. Martin is an Executive Vice President of Stephens Inc., an investment bank, where he has been employed since 1981. He is responsible for the investment of the firm’s capital in private companies. Mr. Martin serves as a member of the board of directors of numerous privately held companies. He received his B.A. in Physics and Economics from Vanderbilt University and his M.B.A. from Stanford University.

Mr. Martin brings to our Board of Directors diverse experience in investment analysis and valuation, and has extensive experience and insights into debt and equity financing and structuring, capital markets and capitalization strategies. Mr. Martin brings historical working knowledge of our Company to our Board of Directors due to his long tenure and relationship with us. Mr. Martin’s relationship with Stephens, Inc., which owns a substantial amount of the Company’s Common Stock, also helps the Board of Directors to have more direct insight into how its decisions impact our stockholders. Mr. Martin is a member of the Credit Risk and Compliance Committee.

William E. Saunders, Jr. was appointed as a director in August 2014 and has served on the Company’s Audit Committee since his appointment. He has also chaired the Company’s Credit Risk and Compliance Committee since the committee’s formation in December 2014. Mr. Saunders has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Community Choice Financial Inc., a leading retailer of alternative consumer financial services products, since June 2008, and Chairman of its Board of Directors since May 2014, after joining the company as its Chief Financial Officer in March 2006. Prior to joining Community Choice Financial (previously CheckSmart Financial Holdings), Mr. Saunders was a Vice President for Stephens Inc., an investment bank, from 2004 to 2006 and, prior to that was an associate at Houlihan Lokey, an investment bank, SunTrust Equitable Securities, an investment bank, and Arthur Andersen, an accounting firm. He also serves on the board of FactorTrust, a global credit reporting agency. Mr. Saunders holds a B.S. in Business with Special Attainment in Accounting and Commerce from Washington & Lee University and is a certified public accountant in the State of Georgia.

Mr. Saunders brings extensive investment banking, finance, management, credit and regulatory experience to our Board.

William (David) Schofman was appointed as a director in March 2012. Mr. Schofman is an active executive, investor and board member for several companies including: PureWRX, Inc., a value-added distributor and reseller of information technology hardware; Coro Health, LLC, a new media healthcare company and CPO Commerce, Inc., the largest online tool retailer. In addition, Mr. Schofman participates in several other business ventures through his private equity and management services business, AnderSchof Investments, LLP. Mr. Schofman previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of Callaway Golf Interactive from June 2004 to September 2007, and as the Executive Vice President Global Ecommerce of Callaway Golf from 2004 to 2007. Mr. Schofman was the co-founder and CEO of FrogTrader from 2000 until 2004, before the Company was sold to Callaway Golf. Prior to that, Mr. Schofman was the co-founder and CEO of International Golf Outlet from 1995 until 1999, which was sold to CBS Sportsline. Mr. Schofman graduated from the University of Texas at Austin in 1994.

Mr. Schofman has varied and valuable experience in marketing, electronic media, E-commerce, retail operations, branding and merchandising strategies. Having built and operated several business ventures, Mr. Schofman brings invaluable background to our Board of Directors. He also brings our Board of Directors a high level of executive experience due to his serving as chief executive officer of businesses, as well as his serving as a director of and advisor to other companies. Mr. Schofman serves on our Compensation Committee.

Oded Shein was appointed as a director in March 2016 and was appointed to the Company’s Audit Committee and Credit Risk and Compliance Committee concurrent with his joining the Board. Mr. Shein has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Stage Stores since January 2011. From July 2004 until January 2011, Mr. Shein served in various financial positions at Belk, Inc., including as its Vice President, Finance and Treasurer. Prior to joining Belk, Inc., Mr. Shein served as the Vice President, Treasurer of Charming Shoppes, Inc. Mr. Shein holds a B.B.A. in Information Systems from Baruch College and an M.B.A. in Finance from Columbia University.

Mr. Shein brings significant knowledge of financial and operational matters in the retail industry, including his experience as a public company Chief Financial Officer, to the Board.

James H. Haworth was appointed as a director in March 2016 and was appointed to the Company’s Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee concurrent with his joining the Board. In August 2016, Mr. Haworth resigned from Professional Bull Riders Inc. (“PBR”) to join Outdoor Cap, a privately held company in Bentonville, Arkansas, as President and Chief Executive Officer. As required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Mr. Haworth submitted his conditional resignation to the Board due to his departure from PBR. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (without Mr. Haworth) considered the conditional resignation and the Board (without Mr. Haworth) accepted the Nominating and

Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation to decline Mr. Haworth’s conditional resignation. Mr. Haworth served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PBR from 2011 to 2016. From 2010 through 2011 he served as Executive Vice President and President, Retail Services for Sears Holding Corporation. Prior to that, he served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Office for Chia Tai Enterprises International Limited & CP Lotus, an investment holding company principally engaged in the operation of shopping centers in China, from 2006 to December 2009. Mr. Haworth is also the founder and President of Business Decisions Inc., a consulting firm specializing in strategic product marketing for the retail, merchandising and supply chain industries. Previous to Business Decisions Inc., Mr. Haworth spent 20 years with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., in roles of increasing responsibility including Executive Vice President of Operations for Sam’s Club and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Mr. Haworth received a Bachelor’s of Science in Business Administration from Central Missouri State University.

Mr. Haworth brings extensive leadership experience in retail and strategic planning through his positions with other public companies to our Board.

If elected, these director nominees will serve one year terms, which will expire at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.

Nomination Policies and Procedures

The goal of our Board has been, and continues to be, to identify nominees for service on the Board of Directors who will bring diverse and varied perspectives and skills from their professional and business experience, including financial and accounting experience, as appropriate. In carrying out its function to nominate candidates for election to our Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the mix of skills, experience, character, commitment, and diversity – diversity being broadly construed to mean a variety of opinions, perspectives, experiences and backgrounds, such as gender, race and ethnicity differences, as well as other differentiating characteristics – all in the context of the requirements of our Board at the time of such consideration. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of its charter annually in connection with the nomination of directors for election at the annual meeting of stockholders. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at www.conns.com under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance”, contain provisions regarding the identification and selection of our director nominees.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities by (1) identifying individuals believed to be qualified to become members of the Board, consistent with Board approved criteria, (2) recommending candidates to the Board for election or reelection as directors, including director candidates submitted by our stockholders, and (3) overseeing, reviewing and making periodic recommendations to the Board concerning our corporate governance policies. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a specific written policy or process regarding the nominations of directors, nor does it maintain minimum standards for director nominees other than as set forth in its charter and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for nomination proposed by stockholders so long as they are made in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.14 of our Bylaws. Section 2.14 of our Bylaws requires that a stockholder provide written notice to our Secretary no later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90^th) day nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120^th) day prior to the anniversary date of the mailing of the proxy statement for the immediately preceding annual meeting of the stockholders. The notice to our Secretary must set forth (a) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director, information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected); (b) as to any other business that the stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting, a brief description of such business, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting and any material interest in the business by the stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made; and (c) as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made (i) the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of such stockholder and beneficial owner; and (ii) the class and number of shares of the Company that are owned beneficially and held of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner. Notwithstanding this procedure, the Board may, in its discretion, exclude from any proxy materials sent to stockholders any matters that may properly be excluded under the Exchange Act, SEC rules or other applicable laws. The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee treats recommendations for directors that are received from the Company’s stockholders equally with recommendations received from any other source, so long as the recommendations comply with the procedures for stockholder recommendations set forth in the Company’s Bylaws, as outlined above.

The charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee sets forth the minimum requirements for a person to be qualified to be a member of the Board of Directors, which are that a person must (i) be an individual of the highest character and integrity and have an inquiring mind, a vision and a willingness to ask hard questions, and the ability to work well with others; (ii) be free of any conflict of interest that would violate any applicable law or regulation or interfere with the proper and reasonable performance of the responsibilities of a director; (iii) be willing and able to devote sufficient time to the affairs of the Company and be diligent in fulfilling the responsibilities of a director and Board committee member (including developing and maintaining sufficient knowledge of the Company and its industry; reviewing and analyzing reports and other information important to the Board and committee responsibilities; preparing for, attending and participating in Board and committee meetings; and satisfying appropriate orientation and continuing education guidelines); and (iv) have the capacity and desire to represent the balanced, best interest of the stockholders as a whole and not primarily a special interest group or constituency. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates whether certain individuals possess the foregoing qualities and recommends to the Board for nomination candidates for election or re-election as directors at the annual meeting of stockholders, or if applicable, at a special meeting of stockholders. This process is the same regardless of whether the nominee is recommended by our Board or by one of our stockholders.

Independent Board Composition

NASDAQ requires that a majority of the board of directors of a listed company be “independent.” NASDAQ’s rules provide that an independent director is a person other than an officer or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship that, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The Board has determined that each of Ms. Malson, Mr. Bob Martin, Mr. Saunders, Mr. Schofman, Mr. Shein and Mr. Haworth is “independent” as defined under applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules. Mr. Bob L. Martin was appointed our Lead Independent Director in August 2012 and has since served as our Lead Independent Director.

The independent directors of the Board held executive sessions at each regular meeting of the Board of Directors during fiscal 2017.

At the meeting of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held in March 2017, the Committee discussed the relationships of Mr. Bob L. Martin with The Stephens Group, LLC, and whether his relationship or ownership interest impacted his ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his responsibility as a director. The Committee discussed the current position of Mr. Martin with The Stephens Group, LLC, and the fact that the position is not substantively different from the consulting work that Mr. Martin has done in previous years for The Stephens Group, LLC, the continuous exercise of independent judgment by Mr. Martin since his election to our Board in 2003, and his lack of control of voting of Common Stock owned by The Stephens Group, LLC or any of its affiliates, including SG-1890 LLC. The Committee has determined that Mr. Martin is properly considered an independent director and recommended to the Board of Directors that it approve Mr. Martin’s independence as defined under the SEC and the NASDAQ rules.

At its meeting in March 2017, our Board of Directors approved the independence of Mr. Bob Martin.

Board Meetings

During fiscal 2017, the Board of Directors held 13 meetings. Each director attended 75% or more of all meetings of the Board and the committees on which such director served during fiscal 2017.

Policy Regarding Director Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

It is our policy that each member of the Board of Directors is encouraged to attend our annual meeting of stockholders. All of our directors serving at the time of last year’s annual meeting attended our annual meeting of stockholders.

Committees of the Board

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent auditors. It also approves audit reports and plans, accounting policies, audit fees and certain other expenses. In connection with the rules adopted by the SEC and NASDAQ, we adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is posted on our website at www.conns.com under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance.” The Audit Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of the written charter on an annual basis.

The current members of our Audit Committee are Ms. Malson, who has served as chair of the Audit Committee since November 2012, Mr. Saunders and Mr. Shein. In March 2016, Mr. Shein replaced Mr. Schofman as a member of the Audit Committee concurrent with Mr. Shein’s appointment to the Board. The Audit Committee held 10 meetings during fiscal 2017. The board has determined that Ms. Malson, Mr. Saunders and Mr. Shein are “audit committee financial experts” as described in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. In addition, each of the members of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as determined by our Board of Directors.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee establishes, reviews and approves the compensation program for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers based upon recommendations by its independent compensation consultant. Our Chief Executive Officer does not play a role, nor does he make any recommendations in respect of, the determination of his own compensation. The Compensation Committee also evaluates the compensation plans, policies and programs of the executive officers of the Company and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning such plans, policies and programs. It addition, it advises the Board regarding compensation plans, policies and programs applicable to non-employee directors for their services as members of our Board, and administers our stock option, stock purchase and other equity plans. The Compensation Committee also evaluates the competitiveness of our compensation and the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. In connection with rules adopted by the SEC and NASDAQ, the Company adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which was amended by our Board in March 2014 to provide that, before engaging a compensation adviser (other than in-house legal counsel), the Compensation Committee shall consider all factors that could affect the independence of such consultant, counsel or advisor as may be identified from time to time in the rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of NASDAQ relevant to that adviser’s independence from management. A copy of the Compensation Committee charter, as amended, is posted on our website at www.conns.com under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance.”

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Mr. Bob Martin (Chair), Mr. Schofman and Mr. Haworth. Mr. Haworth was appointed to the Compensation Committee in March 2016 concurrent with his appointment to the Board.

The Compensation Committee held six meetings during fiscal 2017. All members of the Compensation Committee were determined by the Board of Directors to be independent directors, as defined by NASDAQ listing standards. Additional information on the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration of executive compensation are addressed in the section of this proxy statement captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in identifying and recommending individuals for election or reelection as directors, including director candidates submitted by our stockholders, and advises the Board with respect to corporate governance policies and procedures. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will periodically review and make recommendations regarding our corporate governance policies and procedures, which are discussed in part below under the caption “Corporate Governance” and copies of which are posted on our website at www.conns.com under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance.” We adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a summary “corporate governance policies and procedures” which are posted on our website at www.conns.com under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance.”

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for overseeing a formal evaluation process to assess the composition and performance of the Board, each committee, and each individual director on an annual basis. The assessment is conducted to identify opportunities for improvement and skill set needs, as well as to ensure that the Board, committees, and individual members have the appropriate blend of diverse experiences and backgrounds, and are effective and productive. As part of the process, each member of the Board completes a questionnaire that includes Board, committee and individual assessments. While results are aggregated and summarized for discussion purposes, individual responses are not attributed to any member and are kept confidential to ensure honest and candid feedback is received.

Members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are appointed by the Board. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified, and they may be removed by the Board of Directors in its discretion. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is an independent director (who, for the avoidance of doubt, is not an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries).

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Mr. Bob Martin (Chair), Ms. Malson and Mr. Haworth. Mr. Haworth was appointed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in March 2016 concurrent with his appointment to the Board.

All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were determined by the Board to be “independent” as defined by the SEC and NASDAQ listing standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee held two meetings during fiscal 2017.

Credit Risk and Compliance Committee

In December 2014, the Board established a Credit Risk and Compliance Committee. The Credit Risk and Compliance Committee is responsible for reviewing credit risk, underwriting strategy, compliance activities, the provision methodology, and monitoring trends in the Company’s loan portfolio. We adopted a written charter for the Credit Risk and Compliance Committee, which is posted on our website at www.conns.com under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance.” Our Credit Risk and Compliance Committee currently consists of Mr. Saunders (Chair), Mr. Doug Martin and Mr. Shein. Mr. Shein was appointed to the Credit Risk and Compliance Committee in March 2016, concurrent with his appointment to the Board. The Credit Risk and Compliance Committee held 12 meetings during fiscal 2017.

Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews director compensation for service on the Board and for service on any Board committees, and recommends director compensation and any changes to such compensation to the Board for approval. The Board annually reviews and approves director compensation for Board and committee service based on the recommendations of the Compensation Committee. In fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co. (“F.W. Cook”) to review the competitiveness of the compensation program for our non-employee directors. Based on the review, in May 2014 the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the director compensation program be adjusted to bring the fiscal 2015 annual Board and committee retainers and annual equity grants to non-employee directors in line with median peer group practice to make compensation for service on our Board more competitive in the marketplace. For fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee recommended no changes to the compensation program from the program for fiscal 2015 and annual equity grants continued to track the peer group median. Directors who are also employees of the Company do not receive any compensation for service on the Board in addition to their regular employee compensation. The following table summarizes the fiscal 2017 non-employee director compensation plan:


Fee	Fiscal 2017
Annual Cash Retainer⁽¹⁾	$	70,000
Additional Annual Retainer for:
• Lead Independent Director	$	20,000
• Audit Committee Chair	$	15,000
• Credit Risk and Compliance Committee Chair	$	10,000
• Compensation Committee Chair	$	10,000
• Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Chair	$	7,500
Annual Equity Awards⁽²⁾	$	75,000

(1)	In addition to the following fees, the Company reimburses all directors for reasonable travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their duties as directors, including attendance at meetings.

(2)

Annual equity awards issued under our 2011 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan are granted on the first day following the date of the annual stockholders meeting, are payable in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), are valued at the grant date, and fully vest on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant. The number of shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to each such RSU grant to the directors is determined by dividing the total dollar amount awarded by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

Non-employee directors are also eligible to participate in the employee discount program and are subject to the same terms of the program as Company employees. Pursuant to the employee discount program, non-employee directors can purchase Conn’s merchandise at product cost plus 10%.

At our 2011 annual meeting, our stockholders approved the adoption of the Company’s 2011 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan. This Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee and only non-employee directors are eligible recipients of awards under the Plan. The Plan permits the awarding of restricted stock and RSUs to our non-employee directors.

In May 2016, all non-employee directors received 6,649 RSUs with an aggregate fair value of approximately $75,000. In March 2016, Mr. Shein and Mr. Haworth, upon joining the Board, each received 743 RSUs with an aggregate fair value of approximately $12,500, which reflects a pro-rated grant for their service until the next regularly scheduled grant date.

The following table presents the total compensation for each non-employee director for fiscal 2017:


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)¹		Stock Awards ($)²		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Bob L. Martin	$	107,500	$	75,000		—	—	—	—	$	182,500
Douglas H. Martin	$	70,000	$	75,000		—	—	—	—	$	145,000
James H. Haworth	$	70,000	$	87,500		—	—	—	—	$	157,500
Kelly M. Malson	$	85,000	$	75,000		—	—	—	—	$	160,000
Oded Shein	$	70,000	$	87,500		—	—	—	—	$	157,500
William (David) Schofman	$	70,000	$	75,000		—	—	—	—	$	145,000
William E. Saunders, Jr.	$	80,000	$	75,000		—	—	—	—	$	155,000

(1)

Reflects cash retainer fee of $70,000 per year, annual Committee chair fees paid to Mr. Bob Martin ($20,000 for serving as Lead Independent Director, $10,000 for serving as chair of the Compensation Committee, and $7,500 for serving as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee), Ms. Malson ($15,000 for serving as chair of the Audit Committee), and Mr. Saunders ($10,000 for serving as chair of the Credit Risk and Compliance Committee). Directors who begin their Board service mid-year receive a pro-rata portion of the cash retainers and annual equity compensation.

(2)

Aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted during the year in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Information regarding the assumptions used in calculating the fair value under FASB ASC Topic 718 can be found in Note 1 to the financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017. Each of our non-employee directors was issued 6,649 RSUs pursuant to the Company’s 2011 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan on May 26, 2016. All of the awards vest on May 26, 2017. In March 2016, Mr. Shein and Mr. Haworth, upon joining the Board, each received 743 RSUs with a fair value of approximately $12,500, which reflects a pro-rated grant for their service until the next regularly scheduled grant date.

All non-employee directors are required to own shares of our Common Stock with a value equal to three times his or her annual cash retainer subject to the terms of the Company’s stock ownership guidelines, which are described in greater detail under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Stock Ownership Guidelines.” Non-employee directors must retain 50% of the net after-tax shares realized from any equity awards granted by the Company until the guidelines are met. As of January 31, 2017, each of Messrs. Bob Martin and Doug Martin met the ownership requirements, and each of Mr. Haworth, Ms. Malson, Mr. Saunders, Mr. Schofman, and Mr. Shein continues to make progress toward the required ownership thresholds and is in compliance with the mandatory retention requirement. No non-employee director sold any shares in fiscal 2017.

Listed below are the aggregate outstanding RSU awards and option awards (by number of underlying shares) held by each non-management director as of January 31, 2017:


Name	Stock Awards		Option Awards
Bob L. Martin		6,649		40,000
Douglas H. Martin		6,649		40,000
James H. Haworth		7,392		—
Kelly M. Malson		6,649		—
Oded Shein		7,392		—
William (David) Schofman		6,649		—
William E. Saunders, Jr.		6,649		—

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides stockholders with an understanding of our compensation philosophy, objectives, policies and practices in place during fiscal 2017, as well as the factors considered by our Compensation Committee in making compensation decisions for fiscal 2017. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis focuses on the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our former Chief Financial Officer, our former President and Chief Operating Officer, Retail, and our three other most highly compensated officers for fiscal 2017 (the “named executive officers”), namely:


Name		Title
Norman L. Miller		President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Lee A. Wright		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thomas R. Moran		Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (until June 22, 2016)
Michael J. Poppe		President and Chief Operating Officer, Credit and Collections
David W. Trahan		President and Chief Operating Officer, Retail (retired January 1, 2017)
Brian A. Daly		Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Todd F. Renaud		Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Leadership Changes and Business Highlights

Leadership Changes

During fiscal 2017, the Company continued its process of transforming its executive team with leadership changes including (i) the appointment of Mr. Miller as Chairman of the Board of Directors in May 2016; (ii) the appointment of Mr. Lee Wright as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2016; (iii) the appointment of Mr. George Bchara as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in December 2016; and (iv) the appointment of Coleman R. Gaines as President and Chief Operating Officer – Retail in February 2017.

Mr. Miller has worked to assemble an executive leadership team focused on stabilizing the business and setting the Company on a path to profitable growth aligned with shareholder interests. With his work on assembling a leadership team focused on our business turnaround, Mr. Miller replaced the personnel holding five of the Company’s nine executive officer positions. Furthermore, our leadership team made significant investments in both personnel and key functional areas including credit analytics, warehouse, delivery and distribution, and our loan management system platform. In February 2017, we awarded special equity awards to a group of both executive and non-executive officers who are crucial to executing the Company’s business turnaround strategies. We believe these special equity awards are aligned with stockholders’ value creation interests over the next three years and beyond. For more information see section captioned “Fiscal 2018 Special Equity Awards” of this Proxy.

Business Highlights

We are a leading specialty retailer that offers a broad selection of quality, branded durable consumer goods and related services in addition to a proprietary credit solution for our core credit-constrained consumers. We operate an integrated and scalable business through our retail stores and website. Our complementary product offerings include furniture and mattresses, home appliances, consumer electronics and home office products from leading global brands across a wide range of price points. Our credit offering provides financing solutions to a large, under-served population of credit-constrained consumers who typically have limited financing options. We provide customers the opportunity to comparison shop across brands with confidence in our competitive prices as well as affordable monthly payment options, next-day delivery and installation in the majority of our markets, and product repair service. We believe our large, attractively merchandised stores and credit solutions offer a distinctive shopping experience compared to other retailers that target our core customer demographic.

Fiscal 2017 was a transitional year for our leadership team and business operations. We focused on enhancing our credit platform to improve near-term results and support the pursuit of the Company’s long-term growth objectives. While much of our focus during fiscal 2017 was on our credit operations, our retail stores performed well, demonstrating our differentiated business model and the significant value we provide our customers. We believe our credit operations will benefit from the structural changes we are making to increase yield, reduce losses and improve overall credit performance. We delivered the following financial and operational results in fiscal 2017:

•

During the second half of fiscal 2017, we successfully launched our direct loan program in all of our 55 Texas store locations, which increased the weighted average origination loan yield to 27.0% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 from 21.4% in the second quarter of fiscal 2017, an increase of over 550 basis points;

•

We laid the foundation to implement our direct loan program in four additional states in fiscal 2018, which represented approximately 14% of our originations in fiscal 2017;

•

Revenue remained stable at $1.6 billion for fiscal 2017 compared to $1.6 billion for fiscal 2016, even as we tightened underwriting requirements on our credit offerings in fiscal 2017;

•

Retail gross margin for fiscal 2017 was 37.4%, an increase of 40 basis points over fiscal 2016, driven primarily by improved product margins and mix; and

•

We delivered reductions in our cost of funds on our initial note issuances under our asset-backed securitization program from approximately 9.2% in September 2015 to 7.8% in March 2016, and 6.9% in October 2016.

We believe we are positioned to execute our long-term growth strategy and reduce financial and operational risk while enhancing shareholder value. We have identified the following strategic priorities for fiscal 2018:

•

Implement our direct loan program in up to four additional states to further enhance our yield;

•

Continue to refine and enhance our underwriting model and focus on our collection operations to reduce delinquency rates and future charge-offs to improve future credit segment profitability;

•

Lower our cost of funds;

•

Optimize our mix of quality, branded products and reduce warehouse, delivery and transportation costs to increase our retail gross margin; and

•

Maintain focus on cost control of our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses.

Fiscal 2017 Pay for Performance Highlights

•

No Annual Cash Incentive Bonuses. Bonuses under our annual cash incentive plan are based upon the achievement of certain adjusted operating income goals. Fiscal 2017 adjusted operating income was approximately $70.6 million, which was below threshold-level performance. Accordingly, no bonuses were paid to any of our named executive officers under the fiscal 2017 annual cash incentive plan.

•

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Not Earned. As a result of the Company’s return on invested capital performance for the two-year period ending January 31, 2017 falling below threshold-level, the Compensation Committee determined that all of the performance-based RSUs granted in fiscal 2016 (May 2015) relating to such performance period would not vest and have been forfeited.

•

No Market Adjustments in Total Direct Compensation. No adjustments were made to any component of compensation (base salary, target annual cash bonus or target value of equity awards) for fiscal 2017 for any of our named executive officers who were employed with the Company as of the start of fiscal 2017. The compensation levels were the same in fiscal 2017 as in fiscal 2016.

Fiscal 2017 Discretionary Bonuses

In March 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors considered the award of discretionary bonuses to a group of executive officers who demonstrated exceptional leadership to advance the Company’s turnaround efforts. The Compensation Committee awarded discretionary bonuses to the following named executive officers: $700,000 for Mr. Miller, $400,000 for Mr. Wright (comprised of a $288,000 guaranteed payment for fiscal 2017, as stated in Mr. Wright’s employment offer, and an additional $112,000 in discretionary bonus payment), $50,000 for Mr. Poppe, $110,000 for Mr. Daly and $110,000 for Mr. Renaud for their contributions to stabilizing the Company’s performance and for setting the Company on a path to profitable growth by implementing our business turnaround strategies. Furthermore, these bonuses were paid to these individuals for their focus on increasing retail margins, closing financial transactions to lower the Company’s costs of borrowing, recruiting and focusing on personnel to implement the Company’s business turnaround strategies, and making significant investments in areas including credit analytics, warehouse, delivery and distribution efficiencies, and our loan management platform.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

We have developed a compensation program for our named executive officers designed to: (i) reward and motivate individual and Company performance; (ii) attract and retain executive talent with competitive compensation opportunities; and (iii) build and encourage ownership of our Common Stock. Toward these goals, our compensation program has been designed and administered to reward our named executive officers based on our financial and operating performance and their individual performance, and to align their interests with those of our stockholders. In addition, these goals are intended to encourage long-term commitment to the Company by our named executive officers. We believe that our executive compensation program, which consists primarily of a base salary, an annual performance-based cash bonus opportunity, and time-based and performance-based equity awards, promotes these objectives.

Compensation Philosophy

The following is the executive compensation philosophy that has been adopted by our Compensation Committee:

Compensation realized by executives should reflect the individual skills and contributions of the executive, as well as the Company’s overall performance against its business plan and changes in stockholder value.

The basic objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program include:

•

Attracting, motivating and retaining skilled executives necessary to execute its business strategy;

•

Motivating executives by linking compensation opportunity to the achievement of the Company’s short-term and long-term growth and profitability goals as well as execution of its business strategy;

•

Aligning interests of management and stockholders by linking realized compensation directly to increases in stockholder value and requiring ownership of Company stock over a sustained period; and

•

Promoting a pay-for-performance culture on a risk-appropriate basis with a majority of the named executive officer’s compensation to be earned, or increase in value, based on Company and stock performance.

In addition, the efficiency of the overall program from a tax, accounting, cash flow and stockholder dilution perspective should be balanced against the above objectives. In support of the stated objectives, the Company delivers an executive compensation program that includes the following fundamental elements:

Base salary;

Short-term cash incentives; and

Long-term equity incentives in the form of options, time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs.

Additional benefits and perquisites may be included when appropriate. A named executive officer’s total direct compensation opportunity (i.e., base salary, target short-term cash incentives and long-term equity incentives) should be competitive with market practice. “Market practice” generally means the median (i.e., 50^th percentile) of the total direct compensation opportunity of peer executives at companies in our peer group (defined below). However, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, provide a named executive officer with a total direct compensation opportunity above or below market practice, based on the following factors:

•

The named executive officer’s individual skills, experience, and performance;

•

The difficulty of replacing the named executive officer and importance of the position to the Company; and

•

The risk profile of the named executive officer’s compensation relative to market practice.

Actual compensation earned by a named executive officer may be above or below market level depending on the named executive officer’s individual performance and the Company’s absolute or relative performance compared with its peers.

Compensation Objectives

Reward Performance: A significant portion of the total direct compensation of each of our named executive officers is performance-based. One way in which we reward performance is through grants of equity, the value of which is tied to changes in our stock price. While we recognize that stock price performance is one measure of performance, given the volatile nature of business conditions in our industry and the financial markets, we believe that it may not always be the best performance measure. As a result, in fiscal 2017, a portion of our named executive officers’ total direct compensation is based on the Company’s financial results, as measured by our adjusted operating income in the case of annual cash bonuses and by return on invested capital in the case of performance-based RSUs. The Compensation Committee may also award discretionary bonuses based on its review of individual performance.

Attract, Retain and Motivate: We structure the compensation of our named executive officers with the goal of attracting and retaining excellent executives in our significant areas of operations – sales, merchandising, financial and liquidity, consumer credit, distribution, product service and training. We promote these objectives by ensuring that our compensation is competitive within our industry and by providing that equity awards vest over at least a four-year period (subject to our Compensation Committee’s discretion in determining a different vesting schedule as it deems appropriate under the circumstances). In addition, a significant portion of a named executive officer’s total direct compensation opportunity is tied to performance-based incentives that motivate our named executive officers to achieve strong financial and operational results.

Encourage Ownership of our Common Stock: We believe that ownership of Common Stock by our named executive officers and non-employee directors directly aligns their interests with those of our stockholders. To reinforce this belief, our Compensation Committee adopted stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors and our named executive officers in August 2011. In March 2014, our Board of Directors increased the stock ownership requirements for our Chief Executive Officer and our other named executive officers, as discussed in more detail under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Stock Ownership Guidelines.”

Determining Compensation

The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of the named executive officers on an annual basis and as circumstances arise. Our compensation program consists of three basic elements: (i) base salary; (ii) annual cash bonus (pre-determined based on Company, and, in some cases, individual, performance, and with discretionary aspects to reward those with outstanding performance); and (iii) equity awards. These components work together in determining the overall compensation of our named executive officers.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for administering the executive compensation program for each of the named executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer assists the Compensation Committee with administering the executive compensation program for the other named executive officers, except with regard to certain actions and responsibilities that are specifically reserved to the Compensation Committee or Board of Directors. The Chief Executive Officer plays no role in the compensation process, and is not present during voting or deliberations, with respect to his own compensation. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities are identified in its charter posted on our website at www.conns.com under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance.”

Our Compensation Committee seeks to structure compensation of our named executive officers in such a manner as to avoid encouraging excessive risk taking. To discourage excessive risk-taking the Compensation Committee: (i) caps the annual incentive bonuses at 200% of target; (ii) adopted equity ownership guidelines for our named executive officers; and (iii) imposes varying time horizons for short- and long-term incentive compensation, intending to balance the executive’s attention to our short- and long-term performance goals and business objectives. The Compensation Committee also periodically reviews and adjusts the cash and equity award amounts tied to our short- and long-term performance goals and objectives to better address changes in the market and Company risks as they arise and adjust our direction and actions to compensate for such risks. We believe that these actions ensure ongoing alignment of our pay-for-performance objectives and our stockholder interests with a view to long-term value creation.

In applying the above-described objectives for our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee, in making its final determination, primarily relies upon:

•

input and recommendations received from the Chief Executive Officer regarding the day-to-day performance, areas of responsibilities and expectations for future performance of executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer;

•

publicly available information with respect to the executive compensation practices of our peer group companies;

•

the analysis and recommendations of its independent compensation consultant regarding our compensation programs for our executive officers; and

•

its own judgment and knowledge of the industry.

Input Received from our Chief Executive Officer

The Compensation Committee has historically relied in part on the input and recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer in making its determination regarding base salaries of the executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer), individual levels for bonus compensation, and whether to grant long-term equity awards to such executive officers and if so, in what forms and amounts. The Compensation Committee believes that our Chief Executive Officer, by virtue of his role in overseeing the day-to-day performance of such individuals and his experience in the industry, is appropriately suited to make informed recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the foregoing elements of our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee alone, with input and guidance from its independent compensation consultant, determines the compensation for our Chief Executive Officer.

Industry Peer Group

While the Compensation Committee does not rely solely on any comparative analyses of the amounts and forms of compensation which are paid to executive officers with comparable roles at other public companies, it does review annually and take into consideration such analyses for public companies of comparable size and nature to our businesses (i.e., retail businesses including those that provide in-house financing of their merchandise sales), as well as similarly situated public companies outside the retail business industry. We refer to such companies collectively as our “peer group.” In fiscal 2017, the peer group was reviewed and

updated by the Compensation Committee based on refined selection criteria that better reflect the Company’s size and business. The selection criteria were based on industry classification, revenue, and market capitalization, and developed by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant acting at the Compensation Committee’s direction. The companies that comprised our peer group were: Restoration Hardware, Pier 1 Imports, Aaron’s, Rent-A-Center, La-Z-Boy, Cash America, Mattress Firm Holding, Select Comfort, Ethan Allen, EZCORP, Haverty Furniture, Tuesday Morning, hhgregg, Kirkland’s and First Cash Financial. This peer group was used for purposes of the executive compensation analysis for Messrs. Miller, Moran, Wright, Poppe, Trahan, Daly and Renaud for fiscal 2017.

The Compensation Committee considers the amount and structure of peer company compensation when determining the compensation of executive officers, but the Compensation Committee does not target compensating our named executive officers to a specific benchmark level relative to our peer group, since our business model and resulting areas of responsibility are not directly comparable with those of named executives within our peer group. Instead, the Compensation Committee utilizes the competitive peer group compensation data to confirm that our compensation and incentive opportunities are appropriate and competitive relative to the market. The Compensation Committee may determine to modify the compensation levels of our named executive officers if they are deemed to not be competitive. The Compensation Committee also relies on its knowledge of the industry practices and our peers in determining our named executive officers’ base salary, bonus and equity awards, as it deems appropriate and necessary to reward overall performance and achievements and to promote retention and stability within our executive team.

Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has engaged F.W. Cook as its independent compensation consultant. F.W. Cook is responsible for preparing and presenting a comprehensive competitive market study of the compensation levels and practices for a group of industry peers on an annual basis. The fiscal 2017 Compensation Committee-approved industry peer group is listed and described in more detail above in the section captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Determining Compensation - Industry Peer Group.” As discussed above, F.W. Cook is also responsible for preparing and presenting an outside director compensation study using the same industry peer group. The Compensation Committee relies on F.W. Cook for input on pay philosophy, current market trends, regulatory considerations and prevalence of benefit and perquisite programs.

The Compensation Committee considered whether F.W. Cook is independent from management, utilizing, among other things, the independence factors required by the SEC and NASDAQ. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee determined that F.W. Cook is independent from Company management and that F.W. Cook has no conflicts of interest in performing its work.

A representative of F.W. Cook attends Compensation Committee meetings as requested by the Compensation Committee. F.W. Cook works with management only under the direction of the Compensation Committee and does not provide any other advice or consulting services to the Company.

Other Factors

The Compensation Committee will also consider our financial performance to the extent that the Compensation Committee believes it may be fairly attributed or related to the performance of a particular named executive officer. The Compensation Committee will also consider the contribution of each named executive officer relative to his individual responsibilities and capabilities. While the Compensation Committee does consider our stock price performance generally, it is not used as an explicit performance measure to determine incentive payouts given the fact that it reflects a variety of factors not within the direct control of our named executive officers, including, but not limited to, the business conditions of the industry within which we operate and the broader economy in general.

Elements of Compensation

The compensation of our named executive officers consists of three basic elements: (i) base salary; (ii) annual cash bonus (pre-determined based on Company performance (and, in some cases, individual performance) and with discretionary aspects to reward outstanding performance); and (iii) equity awards. These components work together in determining the overall compensation of our named executive officers.

Base Salary

Each named executive officer receives a base salary determined by the Compensation Committee to be commensurate with the officer’s area of responsibility and that officer’s areas and extent of responsibility in relation to our performance as a whole. Individual salaries take into account our established salary policies; the individual’s levels of responsibility, contribution and value to the Company; individual performance; and prior relevant experience. No specific formula is applied to determine the weight of each factor, and the factors are considered by our Compensation Committee in its discretion. Salary reviews are conducted annually in which individual performance is evaluated; however, individual salaries are not necessarily adjusted each year. Our Compensation Committee generally establishes base salaries at levels that are competitive with market practice, as further described above under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation Philosophy and Objectives.”

The Compensation Committee did not increase the base salaries of any of the named executive officers during fiscal 2017 due to: (i) the Company’s performance in fiscal 2017; (ii) overall market conditions; and (iii) the Committee’s belief that their salaries were competitive when compared to recent market survey data.


Name	FY16 Annual Base Salary		FY17 Annual Base Salary		% Change
Norman L. Miller	$	875,000	$	875,000		0.0	%
Lee A. Wright⁽¹⁾		N/A	$	480,000		N/A
Thomas R. Moran	$	450,000	$	450,000		0.0	%
Michael J. Poppe	$	460,000	$	460,000		0.0	%
David W. Trahan	$	410,000	$	410,000		0.0	%
Brian A. Daly	$	300,000	$	300,000		0.0	%
Todd F. Renaud	$	300,000	$	300,000		0.0	%

(1)

Mr. Wright began his employment with the Company in fiscal 2017.

Annual Cash Incentive Plan

The Company uses annual cash incentives to focus attention on current strategic priorities and drive achievement of short-term objectives. The annual cash incentive plan for fiscal 2017 was designed to focus executive officers towards continuing to improve both corporate and individual performance. The Compensation Committee establishes our bonus program for all named executive officers, as well as certain other executive officers and employees, after receiving recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer. The bonus opportunity is stated as a percentage of base salary consistent with the competitive market for executives in similar positions. The named executive officers receive bonus payments based on the achievement of pre-determined Company performance goals (and in some cases, individual performance goals) approved by the Compensation Committee each fiscal year. Upon completion of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines the annual cash incentive bonuses based on the results of the bonus plan formula described above. The Compensation Committee discusses and approves the annual cash incentive bonus payments annually, considering the factors stated above.

Individual named executive officers may also receive bonus payments based on individual performance. These bonus levels, in the case of executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, are recommended by the Chief Executive Officer, and in all cases, are determined by the Compensation Committee, based on the applicable named executive officer’s level of responsibility and ability to affect the performance of his area of responsibility and the Company’s performance. None of these bonus levels are based upon any percentage of the individuals’ base salary or goals, but each does have defined objective calculations based upon the areas of that individual’s responsibilities. At the end of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee may additionally establish individual performance bonus awards for each named executive officer upon recommendation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (for named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer), or as separately determined by the Compensation Committee. No named executive officer had an individual performance component payment associated with his or her respective bonus opportunity in fiscal 2017.

For fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee established threshold, target and maximum annual incentive cash award levels (as a percentage of base salary) for our named executive officers as follows:


	FY 17 Adjusted Operating Income (in millions)
	$121.70			$158.60			$190.32
Name	Threshold			Target			Maximum			Management Objectives
Norman L. Miller		20.0	%		100.0	%		200.0	%		0.0	%
Lee A. Wright		12.0	%		60.0	%		120.0	%		0.0	%
Thomas R. Moran		12.0	%		60.0	%		120.0	%		0.0	%
Michael J. Poppe		12.0	%		60.0	%		120.0	%		0.0	%
David W. Trahan		12.0	%		60.0	%		120.0	%		0.0	%
Brian A. Daly		8.0	%		40.0	%		80.0	%		10.0	%
Todd F. Renaud		8.0	%		40.0	%		80.0	%		10.0	%

The Company’s adjusted operating income in fiscal 2017 was $70.6 million, which did not meet threshold-level adjusted operating income under the Company’s 2017 annual cash incentive plan. No bonuses were paid to any of our named executive officers under the annual cash incentive plan during fiscal 2017.

Discretionary Bonuses

The Chief Executive Officer may recommend discretionary bonuses, outside of our annual incentive program, for executive officers (other than himself) to the Compensation Committee when deemed appropriate, and provide the Compensation Committee with his rationale for the recommended bonus amounts. Given the day-to-day familiarity that the Chief Executive Officer has with the work performed by the executive officers, the Compensation Committee values his recommendation; however, the Compensation Committee makes all final decisions as to the compensation of the named executive officers. The Committee believes that it is important to have the flexibility to grant discretionary awards if the Company does not achieve one or more specific financial metrics, in the event that the Committee determines that management’s overall performance during the year otherwise merits recognition.

Upon the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, in March 2017, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary bonuses for certain executive officers. The primary purpose of the bonuses was to recognize the valuable contributions of certain individuals who display the leadership qualities and commitment needed to stabilize and position the Company on a path to profitable growth. Each of Mr. Wright ($400,000), Mr. Poppe ($50,000), Mr. Daly ($110,000) and Mr. Renaud ($110,000) received a discretionary bonus in the amounts stated in recognition of their individual performance towards the Company’s operational and strategic achievements not reflected in the Company’s cash incentive plan. Mr. Wright’s payment included $288,000 that was guaranteed during fiscal 2017 as a part of his employment offer. The Compensation Committee also awarded Mr. Miller a discretionary bonus of $700,000 in recognition for commencing a turnaround of the Company’s performance, recruiting and motivating the new leadership team, and delivering financial achievements and other accomplishments in fiscal 2017 not reflected in the Company’s cash incentive plan. Furthermore, these bonuses were paid for the collective focus of the applicable officers on increasing retail margins, closing financing transactions to lower the Company’s costs of borrowing, recruiting and focusing on personnel to implement the Company’s turnaround strategies, and making significant investments in critical areas including credit analytics capabilities, warehouse and distribution efficiencies, and loan management system platform.

Equity Awards

The purpose of our long-term incentive program is to ensure that our executives focus not only on short-term returns but also on achieving long-term Company goals, growth and creation of stockholder value. We further believe that equity ownership by our executive officers aligns executive interests with those of our stockholders. For fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee continued its practice of using time-based RSUs, and, for certain of our named executive officers, performance-based RSUs for long-term incentive compensation.

The target value of equity awards for our named executive officers in fiscal 2017 was, with respect to: (a) Mr. Miller, 100% of the aggregate of (x) annual base salary plus (y) target-level cash bonus award; (b) Mr. Wright, Mr. Poppe, Mr. Moran and Mr. Trahan, 100% of each executive’s annual base salary; and (c) Mr. Daly and Mr. Renaud 50% of each executive’s annual base salary. We believe using a percentage of base salary (and, if applicable, target-level cash bonus award) as the target provides us consistency relative to the value of equity awards we grant each year in support of our compensation philosophy.

The target value of annual equity awards for our named executive officers did not change in fiscal 2017 from the target values during fiscal 2016.

The following table summarizes the annual equity incentive opportunity for our named executive officers under our long-term equity incentive program during fiscal 2017:


											Performance-Based RSUs⁽³⁾
	Total Long-Term Equity Target Value⁽¹⁾					Time Based RSU’s					Threshold ROIC (10.0%)					Target ROIC (15.0%)					Maximum ROIC (18.0%)
Name	As % of Salary⁽²⁾			Dollar Value ($)		As % of Salary⁽²⁾			Dollar Value ($)		As % of Salary⁽²⁾			Dollar Value ($)		As % of Salary⁽²⁾			Dollar Value ($)		As % of Salary⁽²⁾			Dollar Value ($)
Norman L. Miller⁽⁴⁾⁽⁷⁾		100.0	%	$	1,750,000		50.0	%	$	875,000		25.0	%	$	437,500		50.0	%	$	875,000		75.0	%	$	1,312,500
Lee A. Wright⁽⁵⁾		100.0	%	$	480,000		50.0	%	$	240,000		25.0	%	$	120,000		50.0	%	$	240,000		75.0	%	$	360,000
Thomas R. Moran⁽⁷⁾		100.0	%	$	450,000		50.0	%	$	225,000		25.0	%	$	112,500		50.0	%	$	225,000		75.0	%	$	337,500
Michael J. Poppe⁽⁷⁾		100.0	%	$	460,000		50.0	%	$	230,000		25.0	%	$	115,000		50.0	%	$	230,000		75.0	%	$	345,000
David W. Trahan⁽⁷⁾		100.0	%	$	410,000		50.0	%	$	205,000		25.0	%	$	102,500		50.0	%	$	205,000		75.0	%	$	307,500
Brian A. Daly⁽⁶⁾		50.0	%	$	150,000		50.0	%	$	150,000		—			—		—			—		—			—
Todd F. Renaud⁽⁶⁾		50.0	%	$	150,000		50.0	%	$	150,000		—			—		—			—		—			—

(1)

This column reflects the target value of equity awards granted to our named executive officers. In May 2016, Mr. Miller, Mr. Moran, Mr. Poppe and Mr. Trahan received 50% of the total value of their equity awards in time-based RSUs and the other 50% in performance-based RSUs as reflected in the table.

(2)

All of our named executive officer’s target value of equity awards in fiscal 2017 was equal to the stated percentage of annual base salary, other than for Mr. Miller, whose target value of annual equity awards in fiscal 2016 was equal to 100% of the aggregate of his respective (x) annual base salary plus (y) target-level cash bonus award.

(3)	Determined over a two-year performance period ending January 31, 2018 based on return on invested capital (“ROIC”), as defined below.

(4)

In connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer in September 2015, Mr. Miller received 69,881 time-based RSUs. Initially, these RSUs were scheduled to vest ratably over five years on each anniversary of the grant date, and on January 2, 2017, the Board modified the remaining RSUs to vest ratably over four years on each anniversary of the grant date. On January 2, 2017, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Miller 100,000 stock options valued at $920,483 at time of grant as an incentive award for ongoing efforts of leading the organization during the business turnaround. For more information see section captioned “CEO Performance Stock Option Grant and Modification of Initial New Hire Equity Grant Vesting Schedule.”

(5)	In connection with his appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2016, Mr. Lee Wright received 59,259 time-based RSUs. The RSUs vest ratably over four years on each anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Wright did not receive any other equity award in fiscal 2017.

(6)	Only received time-based awards that vest ratably over a four-year period.

(7)	50% of the target value of long-term equity awards is comprised of time-based equity awards and 50% is comprised of performance-based equity awards. The time-based RSUs vest over a four-year period beginning on May 25, 2016.

ROIC for each performance-based RSU grant is calculated over a two-year period as: (A) average adjusted operating income (excluding charges and credits) divided by (B) the average balances of (i) debt plus (ii) equity, minus (iii) cash over the two-year period. The measurement period for the performance-based RSUs issued in fiscal 2017 end on January 31, 2018. The ROIC metrics for the performance-based RSUs granted during fiscal 2016, which have been approved by the Compensation Committee, are as

follows: (i) threshold-level performance will be achieved if ROIC is equal to 10.0% over the measurement period; (ii) target level performance will be achieved if ROIC is equal to 15.0% over the measurement period; and (iii) maximum-level performance will be achieved if ROIC is equal to 18% over the measurement period. The number of performance-based RSUs is calculated on a pro-rata basis when the performance metrics fall between threshold and target or target and maximum, as applicable. No shares will be issued when ROIC falls below the threshold level and no additional shares will be issued when the performance conditions exceed the maximum level. Any fiscal 2017 performance-based RSUs earned will vest as follows: 50% at May 25, 2018; 25% at May 25, 2019; and 25% at May 25, 2020.

The Compensation Committee selected ROIC because it is a measure of whether the long-term capital investment decisions made by our named executive officers improved our financial and operational performance. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that our ROIC performance is closely linked to our stock price performance and stockholder returns.

The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, grant other equity awards to the named executive officers from time-to-time, which may include time-vested stock options, restricted stock, time-based RSUs, and performance-based RSUs pursuant to our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. In making any such awards, the Compensation Committee will consider:

•

the number of equity awards previously granted to the named executive officer; and

•

the named executive officer’s past and expected future contributions to the Company.

Compensation under our equity incentive program is intended to align the long-term interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders and to provide long-term performance incentives to our named executive officers to complement the other forms of compensation they receive.

In making long-term incentive compensation decisions, no formal weighting formula is used in deciding award amounts under our equity incentive programs. Our Compensation Committee instead considers each executive’s ability and individual responsibility to directly impact our Company’s overall performance in the long-term, and makes equity awards based on considerations for each individual executive.

We use equity awards to counterbalance base salary and short-term cash bonus compensation components provided to our named executive officers and to further align executive pay with the long-term financial performance of the Company. We do not target any set mix of compensation components. Our Compensation Committee reviews the goals of our Company and the status of the markets in which we compete to determine the appropriate combination of short-term and long-term incentive compensation should be structured in order to properly incentivize our executives to best implement both the short-term and long-term elements of our Company strategies.

CEO Performance Stock Option Grant and Modification of Initial New Hire Equity Grant Vesting Schedule

On January 2, 2017, the Board of Directors approved the grant to Mr. Miller of a premium-priced non-qualified stock option grant as an additional incentive to successfully implement the business turnaround strategy the Company is currently pursuing under Mr. Miller’s leadership. The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Miller 100,000 stock options valued at $920,483 at the time of the grant. This award focuses on aligning Mr. Miller’s interests with those of our stockholders by providing incentives to increase stockholder value. Of the 100,000 stock options, 33,333 were awarded with a strike price of $12.65, another 33,333 were awarded with a 150% premium strike price of $18.98, and the final 33,334 were awarded with a 200% premium strike price of $25.30. The stock options vest ratably over a four year period on each anniversary of the grant date. We believe that delivering this award in the form of stock options, with the substantial majority having a strike price above the grant date trading price is an effective way to further align Mr. Miller’s interests with those of our stockholders, as the award will have value only if the stock price increases following the grant date.

On January 2, 2017, the Board of Directors also modified the vesting schedule for the remaining unvested RSUs from Mr. Miller’s initial new hire equity award such that they will vest ratably over a four year vesting schedule on each anniversary of the grant date, rather than over a five year vesting schedule. This vesting schedule modification to four years was done to reflect market conditions for such equity grants and is summarized in the table below.


Vest Date	Initial RSUs		Revised RSUs
9/7/2016		13,976		13,976
9/7/2017		13,976		18,635
9/7/2018		13,976		18,635
9/7/2019		13,976		18,635
9/7/2020		13,977		0
Total		69,881		69,881

Fiscal 2018 Special Equity Awards

On February 23, 2017, the Board of Directors approved special equity awards for Mr. Miller, Mr. Wright, Mr. Daly and Mr. Renaud (as well as other executive and non-executive officers) for retention and motivational purposes during our business turnaround. The recipients were selected in part based on the criticality of their respective roles in executing our business turnaround strategies, the leadership characteristic these individuals have displayed and continue to display in recruiting other highly talented managers in their respective disciplines, and their efforts and performance in putting the Company on a path to sustainable profitability. These special equity awards consisted of ~~both~~ an aggregate award of 487,000 performance-based RSUs (also referred to as PSUs) and 527,000 time-based RSUs, for an aggregate award of 1,014,000 units. ~~While a portion of the performance-based RSU~~ ~~(PSU) grants are contingent upon stockholder approval of the Amended 2016 Plan (Proposal 5), all of the RSU grants are contingent upon stockholder approval of the Amended 2016 Plan.~~ The PSUs are aligned with stockholder value creation interests because the PSUs will vest, if at all, only upon the certification, after fiscal 2020, by the Compensation Committee of the satisfaction of the annual and cumulative Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization “EBITDA” performance conditions over the three fiscal years commencing with fiscal 2018. Further, a “Total Shareholder Return” modifier could be applied to the PSUs based upon a comparison of the Company’s stock price in February 2017 and February 2020. ~~Contingent upon stockholder approval of the Amended 2016 Plan, t~~The RSUs will vest in three equal installments over a three-year period, the first installment vesting on the first anniversary of the award date; the second installment vesting on the second anniversary of the award date; and the third installment vesting on the third anniversary of the award date. These special equity awards are intended at this time to cover those prospective annual equity grants that Mr. Miller, Mr. Wright, Mr. Daly, Mr. Renaud, and the other special equity award recipients would have received in each of fiscal 2018, fiscal 2019, and fiscal 2020. Of the total 1,014,000 special equity award grants, 58,000 PSUs and 258,000 RSUs, in each case granted to Mr. Miller, are contingent upon stockholder approval of the Amended 2016 Plan (Proposal 5). For more information, see section captioned “Special Equity Awards in Fiscal 2018.”

Timing of Equity Grants

Annual equity awards are generally granted to our named executive officers at the Company’s regular meeting of the Board of Directors scheduled for the first quarter of each fiscal year. Off-cycle (non-annual) awards may be made if our Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee deem it appropriate for newly-promoted employees, strategic new hires, or in other special or unique circumstances.

Settlement of Fiscal 2016 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards

In May 2015, the Compensation Committee granted Messrs. Poppe and Trahan performance-based RSUs. These awards were based on the Company’s ROIC over the two-year period ended January 31, 2017. Messrs. Poppe, and Trahan were eligible to earn between 0% and 150% of their targeted award, depending on our ROIC during the measurement period. Mr. Trahan retired on January 1, 2017 and forfeited eligibility under these awards. In March 2017, the Compensation Committee determined the ROIC for the measurement period fell below threshold-level. As a result, the Compensation Committee did not approve the vesting or issuance of any of the fiscal 2017 performance-based RSU awards and all such performance-based RSUs have been forfeited.

President, CEO and Chairman of the Board Compensation

On September 7, 2015, our Board appointed Mr. Miller as President and Chief Executive Officer. In negotiating the terms of Mr. Miller’s compensation, the Compensation Committee received information and advice from F.W. Cook, its independent compensation consultant, considered the same objectives and competitive positioning it considered at that time with respect to our other then-current executive officers, and approved the following compensation package:

•

Annual base salary: $875,000.

•

Sign-On Bonus: $300,000.

•

Annual Cash Incentive Plan: Mr. Miller is eligible for an annual target cash bonus opportunity equal to 100% of his base salary and a maximum annual cash bonus opportunity equal to 200% of his base salary.

•

Long-Term Incentive Plan: Mr. Miller is eligible for an annual target long-term incentive grant equal to the sum of 100% of the aggregate of (i) his annual base salary, plus (ii) his target-level annual cash bonus.

•

Initial Long-Term Incentive Award: Mr. Miller received a grant of RSUs with an aggregate grant date value of $2,000,000 on September 7, 2015. When granted, these RSUs were to vest ratably on each anniversary of the grant date over five years. On January 2, 2017, the Board approved a vesting modification to align with market practices, as a result of which, the remaining shares of Mr. Miller’s initial long-term incentive award will vest ratably on each anniversary of the grant date over four years.

•

Other Benefits: Mr. Miller is also eligible for other benefits, including participation in the Company’s other employee benefit plans available to other employees of the Company (including healthcare). Mr. Miller received assistance for his commuting expenses until September 2016. He will continue to receive relocation assistance until April 2017.

•

Severance Agreement: The Company entered into a severance agreement with Mr. Miller as described under the section entitled “Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements - Executive Severance Agreements”.

•

Discretionary Bonuses: Mr. Miller is eligible to receive discretionary bonuses, if any, granted by the Board from time to time.

Newly-Appointed CFO Compensation

Effective on June 22, 2016, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Lee A. Wright, as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. With respect to this appointment, the Compensation Committee approved the following compensation package for Mr. Wright, based on market compensation data presented by F.W. Cook and consistent with our compensation philosophy:

•

Annual base salary: $480,000.

•

Annual Cash Incentive Plan: Mr. Wright is eligible for an annual target cash bonus opportunity equal to 60% of his base salary and a maximum annual cash bonus opportunity equal to 120% of his base salary. Mr. Wright’s 2017 target bonus ($288,000) was guaranteed and paid in March 2017.

•

Long-Term Incentive Plan: Mr. Wright is eligible for an annual target long-term incentive grant equal to 100% of his annual base salary.

•

Initial Long-Term Incentive Award: Mr. Wright received a grant of RSUs with an aggregate grant date value equal to $480,000. These RSUs vest ratably on each anniversary of the grant date over four years.

•

Other Benefits: Mr. Wright is also eligible for other benefits, including participation in the Company’s other employee benefit plans available to other employees of the Company (including healthcare).

•

Severance Agreement: The Company entered into a severance agreement with Mr. Wright as described under the section entitled “Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements - Executive Severance Agreements”.

•

Discretionary Bonuses: Mr. Wright is eligible to receive discretionary bonuses, if any, granted by the Board from time to time.

Transition Agreement with Mr. Thomas Moran

On October 1, 2016, Conn’s entered into a transition agreement with Mr. Moran to provide for an orderly transition of Chief Financial Officer duties, responsibilities and authority from Mr. Moran to Mr. Wright.

The terms of Mr. Moran’s transition agreement provide that Mr. Moran will be paid his base salary for 18 months commencing October 1, 2016, and during such period, all equity awards held by Mr. Moran under the Company’s equity plans will continue to vest and be exercisable as if Mr. Moran had remained an employee of the Company during such period. Mr. Moran’s transition agreement requires him to be bound by the non-disclosure, non-competition and non-solicitation covenants contained therein until March 1, 2018. Mr. Moran has also agreed that any payments received under the transition agreement or otherwise from the Company shall be subject to claw-back by the Company to the extent necessary under applicable law.

Health, Retirement, Perquisites and Other Benefits

Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in the same retirement and other health and welfare benefit plans, including medical, dental, vision, long-term and short-term disability, life insurance, employee discount, and in the Company’s employee stock purchase plan, in each case on the same basis as our other eligible employees.

Annual Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

At our 2016 annual meeting, approximately 99% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory resolution on our executive compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that the positive outcome of this vote supports the compensation arrangements established by it for our named executive officers, and therefore continued to apply the same pay-for-performance principles and philosophies when making decisions relating to the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2017.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In August 2011, our Board of Directors adopted stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors and certain executive officers to align their interests more closely with the interests of our stockholders. During the fiscal year ended January 1, 2015, the Compensation Committee increased the stock ownership guidelines for our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is now required to own shares of Common Stock with a value equal to at least five times his or her annual base salary, and each other named executive officer is required to own shares of our Common Stock with a value equal to at least four times his or her annual base salary. All beneficially owned shares of Common Stock, including vested options, options that will vest within 60 days and unvested RSUs are counted towards achievement of the ownership guideline. Individuals are required to achieve the applicable level of ownership within five years after first becoming subject to the guidelines. If an individual becomes subject to the stock ownership guidelines or is subject to a greater ownership amount due to promotion or an increase in base salary, the individual is expected to meet the applicable ownership amount within the later of the original period or 12 months from the effective date of the promotion or salary change. If an individual falls below the applicable guideline due solely to a decline in the value of the Common Stock, the individual will not be required to acquire additional shares to meet the guideline, but he or she will be required to retain all shares then held (except for shares withheld to pay withholding taxes or the exercise price of options) until such time as the individual again attains the stock ownership threshold.

As of January 31, 2017, Mr. Poppe had met his stock ownership requirements. Mr. Miller (who joined the Company in September 2015), Mr. Wright (who joined the Company in June 2016), Mr. Renaud (who joined the Company in December 2014) and Mr. Daly (who joined the Company in December 2015) have not yet attained their required level of ownership due to their recent commencement of employment and decline in stock price. Each has five years from their respective date of hire to attain the required level of ownership. Mr. Trahan exercised the majority of his remaining stock options on January 17, 2017, after his retirement from the Company. His remaining out-of-money stock options (20,000) expired on April 1, 2017.

Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging

The Company’s insider trading policy, a copy of which is available on our website at http://ir.conns.com, restricts all officers, directors and certain employees from engaging in any of the following activities with respect to the securities of the Company:

•

Purchases on margin (where money is borrowed to make the purchase);

•

Short sales;

•

Buying or selling puts or calls;

•

Hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, that allow an employee to lock in much of the value of his or her stock holdings, often in exchange for all or part of the potential upside appreciation in the stock; or

•

Holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan without adequate financial resources to prevent a forced sale.

To the Company’s knowledge, none of our officers or directors have entered into any hedging transactions with respect to Company stock, nor have they pledged any Company stock to secure any personal indebtedness or deposited Company stock into any margin account.

Other Compensation

We provide our named executive officers with limited perquisites and other benefits, as reflected in the All Other Compensation column in the “Summary Compensation Table” below, which the Compensation Committee believes are reasonable, competitive and consistent with the objectives of our executive compensation program.

Employment and Related Agreements

Certain of the named executive officers have entered into Executive Severance Agreements with the Company and others are party to the Executive Severance Plan adopted by the Company in December 2015, the material terms of which are explained in more detail under the section “Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements” below.

Tax Implications of Our Compensation Policies

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation that we may deduct in any given year with respect to the CEO and certain of our other most highly paid executive officers. There is an exception to the $1,000,000 limitation for performance-based compensation meeting certain requirements. Our stock option awards and performance-based restricted stock unit awards generally are performance-based compensation meeting those requirements and, as such, are typically fully deductible. Performance-based cash bonus compensation awards under our Management Incentive Compensation Program may also be tax deductible. Our annual base salary and time-based restricted stock units are generally subject to the Section 162(m) deduction limitations. To maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in view of the overall objectives of our compensation program, the Committee has not adopted a policy requiring that all compensation be tax deductible.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and discussed it with the Company’s management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017 and the Company’s 2017 Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A related to the 2017 annual meeting, for filing with the SEC.

Compensation Committee:

Bob L. Martin (Chair)

William (David) Schofman

James Haworth

Summary Compensation Table


Name	Fiscal Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)⁽¹⁾		Stock Awards ($)⁽²⁾		Option Awards ($)⁽³⁾		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		All Other Compensation ($)⁽⁴⁾		Total ($)
Norman L. Miller⁽⁵⁾		2017	$	875,000	$	700,000	$	1,749,993	$	920,483		—	$	253,273	$	4,498,749
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board		2016	$	351,325	$	300,000	$	1,999,994		—		—	$	37,858	$	2,689,177

Lee A. Wright⁽⁵⁾⁽⁶⁾		2017	$	280,000	$	400,000	$	479,998		—		—	$	3,000	$	1,162,998
Executive Vice President and CFO

Thomas R. Moran		2017	$	337,500		—	$	449,993		—		—	$	115,682	$	903,175
Former Executive Vice President and CFO		2016	$	232,812		—	$	600,006		—		—	$	24,174	$	856,992

Michael J. Poppe		2017	$	460,000	$	50,000	$	959,992		—		—	$	19,321	$	1,489,313
President & Chief Operating Officer – Credit & Collections		2016	$	460,000		—	$	1,459,995		—		—	$	14,789	$	1,934,784
		2015	$	460,000		—	$	460,026		—		—	$	19,588	$	939,614

David W. Trahan		2017	$	375,833		—	$	410,010		—		—	$	11,000	$	796,843
Former President – Retail		2016	$	410,000		—	$	410,032		—		—	$	12,000	$	832,032
		2015	$	410,000		—	$	409,973		—		—	$	12,000	$	831,973

Brian A. Daly⁽⁵⁾		2017	$	300,000	$	110,000	$	150,002		—		—	$	71,207	$	631,209
Vice President & Chief Human Resources Officer

Todd F. Renaud⁽⁵⁾		2017	$	300,000	$	110,000	$	150,002		—		—	$	7,915	$	567,917
Vice President and Chief Information Officer		2016	$	300,000		—	$	299,991		—		—	$	27,457	$	627,448

(1)

Any amounts paid upon the achievement of pre-established Company goals appear in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. Because the Company did not meet threshold-level adjusted operating income targets as determined by the Compensation Committee for purposes of the Company’s annual cash incentive plan for fiscal 2017, no bonuses were paid to any named executive officer under the plan. The “Bonus” column discloses discretionary cash bonus awards. The discretionary bonus in the amount of $700,000 shown for Mr. Miller, and the amounts shown for Mr. Wright, Mr. Poppe, Mr. Daly and Mr. Renaud in fiscal 2017 were in recognition of their contributions to the Company’s business turnaround objectives. Mr. Wright’s payment included $288,000 that was guaranteed for fiscal 2017 as a part of his employment offer. The $300,000 in this column for Mr. Miller was his fiscal 2016 sign-on bonus.

(2)

Aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the year in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, which may be greater or less than the value that the named executive officer realizes upon vesting of the RSUs. Information regarding the assumptions used in calculating the fair value under FASB ASC Topic 718 can be found in Note 10 to the financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017. Performance-based RSUs granted assume achievement of target level financial metrics related to fiscal 2017 grants. Assuming the highest level of performance is achieved for the performance-based RSUs, the maximum value of these awards at the grant date would be as follows: Mr. Miller – $875,000; Mr. Poppe – $345,000; and Mr. Trahan – $307,500.

(3)

Aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted during the year in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation,” which may be greater or less than the value that the named executive officer realizes upon vesting of the options. Information regarding the assumptions used in calculating the fair value under FASB ASC 718 can be found in Note 10 to the financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017.

(4)	All Other Compensation for fiscal 2017 consists of:

•

Matching contributions under the Company’s 401(k) plan as follows: Mr. Miller, $7,950, Mr. Wright, $3,000; Mr. Poppe, $7,321; Mr. Daly, $5,400; and Mr. Renaud, $7,915.

•

Automobile and gas allowance as follows: Mr. Miller, $12,000; Mr. Poppe, $12,000; and Mr. Trahan, $11,000.

•

Relocation assistance as follows: Mr. Miller, $233,323; Mr. Moran, $3,182; and Mr. Daly, $65,807.

•

Severance payouts: During fiscal 2017, Mr. Moran received $112,500 in severance and is eligible, per his severance agreement, for an additional fifteen months of salary equivalent to $562,500.

All Other Compensation


Name	401K Match		Car Allowance		Relocation		Severance		Total
Norman L. Miller	$	7,950	$	12,000	$	233,323	$	0	$	253,273
Lee A. Wright	$	3,000	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	3,000
Thomas R. Moran	$	0	$	0	$	3,182	$	112,500	$	115,682
Michael J. Poppe	$	7,321	$	12,000	$	0	$	0	$	19,321
David W. Trahan	$	0	$	11,000	$	0	$	0	$	11,000
Brian A. Daly	$	5,400	$	0	$	65,807	$	0	$	71,207
Todd F. Renaud	$	7,915	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	7,915

(5)

With respect to Messrs. Miller, and Moran, information for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015 (“fiscal 2015”) is not included because both executives joined the Company during fiscal 2016 and neither was an employee of the Company during fiscal 2015. With respect to Mr. Wright, information is not included for fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2016 because he joined the Company in June 2016 as Chief Financial Officer. With respect to Mr. Daly, information is not included for fiscal 2016 because he joined the Company and subsequently became a named executive officer during fiscal 2017. With respect to Mr. Renaud, fiscal 2015 is not included because he joined the Company during fiscal 2015 and did not become a named executive officer until fiscal 2016.

(6)	Mr. Wright’s base salary in fiscal 2017 represents the pro-rata portion of Mr. Wright’s annualized base salary for fiscal 2017 of $480,000, reflecting his commencement of employment in June 2016.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards


			Estimated Future Payouts Under Non- Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽²⁾
Name	Grant Type	Grant Date	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold (#)⁽³⁾		Target (#)⁽⁴⁾		Maximum (#)⁽⁵⁾		All Other Stock Awards; Number of Shares of Stock or Stock Units (#)⁽⁶⁾		All Other Option Awards; Number of Securities Under-Lying Options (#)⁽⁶⁾		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)⁽⁷⁾
Norman L. Miller	Annual Cash Incentive	N/A	$	175,000	$	875,000	$	1,750,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Time Based RSUs	5/25/2016		—		—		—		—		—		—		75,107		—		—	$	874,997
	Performance Based RSUs	5/25/2016		—		—		—		37,554		75,107		112,661		—		—		—	$	874,997
	Non-Qualified Stock Option	1/2/2017		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		33,333	$	12.65	$	326,773
	Non-Qualified Stock Option	1/2/2017		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		33,333	$	18.98	$	305,210
	Non-Qualified Stock Option	1/2/2017		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		33,334	$	25.30	$	288,499

Lee A. Wright	Annual Cash Incentive	N/A	$	57,600	$	288,000	$	576,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Time Based RSUs	6/22/2016		—		—		—		—		—		—		59,259		—		—	$	479,998

Thomas R. Moran	Annual Cash Incentive	N/A	$	54,000	$	270,000	$	540,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Time Based RSUs	5/25/2016		—		—		—		—		—		—		19,313		—		—	$	224,996
	Performance Based RSUs	5/25/2016		—		—		—		9,657		19,313		28,970		—		—		—	$	224,996

Michael J. Poppe	Annual Cash Incentive	N/A	$	55,200	$	276,000	$	552,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Time Based RSUs	5/25/2016		—		—		—		—		—		—		19,742		—		—	$	229,994
	Performance Based RSUs	5/25/2016		—		—		—		9,871		19,742		29,613		—		—		—	$	229,994
	Time Based RSUs	6/7/2016		—		—		—		—		—		—		55,249		—		—	$	500,003

David W. Trahan	Annual Cash Incentive	N/A	$	49,200	$	246,000	$	492,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Time Based RSUs	5/25/2016		—		—		—		—		—		—		17,597		—		—	$	205,005
	Performance Based RSUs	5/25/2016		—		—		—		8,799		17,597		26,396		—		—		—	$	205,005

Brian A. Daly	Annual Cash Incentive	N/A	$	30,000	$	150,000	$	300,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Time Based RSUs	12/1/2016		—		—		—		—		—		—		13,393		—		—	$	150,002

Todd F. Renaud	Annual Cash Incentive	N/A	$	30,000	$	150,000	$	300,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Time Based RSUs	12/1/2016		—		—		—		—		—		—		13,393		—		—	$	150,002

(1)

These columns show the annual cash award opportunities under the Company’s annual cash incentive bonus plan for fiscal 2017. The Company did not meet threshold operating income performance during such fiscal year, and thus no amounts were paid out under the annual cash incentive bonus plan. This is reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” and discussed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

(2)

The number of performance-based RSUs is calculated on a pro-rata basis when the performance metrics fall between threshold and target or target and maximum, as applicable. No shares will be issued when return on invested capital falls below the threshold level and no additional shares will be issued when the performance conditions exceed the maximum level. Any performance-based RSUs earned will vest as follows: 50% at May 25, 2018; 25% at May 25, 2019; and 25% at May 25, 2020.

(3)	Represents the number of performance-based RSUs to be issued on May 25, 2018 if the Company’s ROIC is equal to 10.0% over the two-year measurement period ending January 31, 2018.

(4)	Represents the number of performance-based RSUs to be issued on May 25, 2018 if the Company’s ROIC is equal to 15.0% over the two-year measurement period ending January 31, 2018.

(5)	Represents the number of performance-based RSUs to be issued on May 25, 2018 if the Company’s ROIC is equal to 18.0% over the two-year measurement period ending January 31, 2018.

(6)

This column shows the number of time-based RSUs granted in fiscal 2017. The May 25, 2016 time-based RSU grant vests in four equal annual installments with respect to Messrs. Miller, Moran, Poppe and Trahan. The June 7, 2016 grant to Mr. Poppe and June 22, 2016 grant to Mr. Wright also vest in four equal installments. With respect to the December 1, 2016 grant to Mr. Daly and Mr. Renaud, in each case the RSU grant vests ratably over the four year period beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

(7)

The amounts in the “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column were determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, which may be greater or less than the value than the respective named executive officer realizes upon the vesting of the performance-based RSUs and time-based RSUs. The grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs was measured using the market price per share of our Common Stock on the date of grant multiplied by the target number of units noted in the table, as this was considered the probable outcome on the date of grant.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2017


			Option Awards										Stock Awards
Name	Grant Date		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options - Exercisable (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options - UnExercisable (#)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Norman L. Miller		9/7/2015												55,905	$	623,341	⁽¹⁾
		5/25/2016												75,107	$	837,443	⁽²⁾
		5/25/2016															⁽³⁾		75,107	$	837,443
		1/2/2017				33,333	⁽⁴⁾		$	12.65		1/2/2027
		1/2/2017				33,333	⁽⁴⁾		$	18.98		1/2/2027
		1/2/2017				33,334	⁽⁴⁾		$	25.30		1/2/2027

Lee A. Wright		6/22/2016												59,259	$	660,738	⁽⁵⁾

Thomas R. Moran		7/27/2015												12,902	$	143,857	⁽⁶⁾
		5/25/2016												19,313	$	215,340	⁽²⁾
		5/25/2016															⁽³⁾		19,313	$	215,340

Michael J. Poppe		11/27/2007		20,000					$	19.99		11/27/2017
		11/25/2008		30,000					$	6.33		11/25/2018
		11/24/2009		30,000					$	6.34		11/24/2019
		11/30/2010		35,000					$	3.20		11/30/2020
		6/3/2013												1,070	$	11,931	⁽⁷⁾
		5/27/2014												2,505	$	27,931	⁽⁸⁾
		5/27/2015												4,675	$	52,126	⁽⁹⁾
		5/27/2015															⁽¹⁰⁾		6,233	$	69,498
		8/26/2015												26,429	$	294,683	⁽¹¹⁾
		5/25/2016												19,742	$	220,123	⁽²⁾
		5/25/2016															⁽³⁾		19,742	$	220,123
		6/7/2016												55,249	$	616,026	⁽¹²⁾

David W. Trahan		11/27/2007		20,000					$	19.99		11/27/2017

Brian A. Daly		11/16/2015												4,959	$	55,293	⁽¹³⁾
		12/1/2016												13,393	$	149,332	⁽¹⁴⁾

Todd F. Renaud		8/26/2014												1,897	$	21,152	⁽¹⁵⁾
		12/1/2014												1,442	$	16,078	⁽¹⁶⁾
		8/26/2015												3,964	$	44,199	⁽¹¹⁾
		12/1/2015												4,785	$	53,353	⁽¹⁷⁾
		12/1/2016												13,393	$	149,332	⁽¹⁴⁾

(1)	On January 2, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the reduction of the vesting period of Mr. Miller’s initial new hire equity grant from five to four years. Remaining RSUs vest ratably over remaining three years with final vesting on September 7, 2020.

(2)	RSUs vest ratably at 25% per year over four years, ending on May 25, 2020.

(3)	Reflects the target number of performance-based RSUs that may be issued for the twenty-four month performance period ending January 31, 2018. The performance-based RSUs vest 50% on May 25, 2018, and 25% on May 25, 2019 and May 25, 2020.

(4)	Stock Options vest ratably at 25% per year over four years, ending on January 2, 2021.

(5)	RSUs vest ratably at 25% per year over four years, ending on June 22, 2020.

(6)	RSUs vest ratably at 25% over four years, ending on July 27, 2019.

(7)	RSUs vest ratably at 25% over four years, ending on June 3, 2017.

(8)	RSUs vest ratably at 25% per year over four years, ending on May 27, 2018.

(9)	RSUs vest ratably at 25% per year over four years, ending on May 27, 2019.

(10)

Reflects the target number of performance-based RSUs that may be issued for the twenty-four month performance period ending January 31, 2017. The performance-based RSUs vest 50% on May 25, 2018, and 25% on May 25, 2019 and May 25, 2020. In March 2017, the Compensation Committee determined the Company did not meet threshold-level for ROIC for such performance period and all such performance-based RSUs issued in fiscal 2016 relating to such performance period have been forfeited.

(11)	RSUs vest ratably at 20% per year over five years, ending on August 26, 2020.

(12)	RSUs vest ratably at 25% per year over four years, ending on June 7, 2020.

(13)	RSUs vest ratably at 20% per year over five years, ending on November 16, 2020.

(14)	RSUs vest ratably at 25% per year over four years, ending on December 1, 2020.

(15)	RSUs vest ratably at 20% per year over five years, ending on August 26, 2019.

(16)	RSUs vest ratably at 20% per year over four years, ending on December 1, 2019.

(17)	RSUs vest ratably at 20% per year over five years, ending on December 1, 2020.

Options Exercised and Stock Vested


	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Norman L. Miller		—		—		13,976	$	100,627
Lee A. Wright		—		—		—		—
Thomas R. Moran		—		—		4,300	$	30,573
Michael J. Poppe		—		—		17,169	$	159,208
David W. Trahan		51,166	$	358,313		8,580	$	93,507
Brian A. Daly		—		—		1,239	$	13,133
Todd F. Renaud		—		—		3,300	$	29,657

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

Executive Severance Agreements

We have entered into executive severance agreements with each of Messrs. Miller, Theo Wright, Poppe, Lee Wright, Moran, and Trahan (collectively, the “Agreements”). We had previously entered into an executive severance agreement with Mr. Theo Wright, former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, but Mr. Theo Wright’s transition agreement terminated his Agreement, and he is no longer entitled to any benefits thereunder. Mr. Theo Wright will continue to be bound by the non-disclosure, non-competition and non-solicitation covenants contained in his Agreement until January 31, 2019. The Agreements are designed to (i) provide a level of transition assistance in the event of an involuntary termination of employment with the goal of keeping the subject named executive officers focused on our business rather than their personal circumstances, and (ii) encourage the subject named executive officers to continue to devote their full attention to the business of the Company in the event of a potential change in control to allow for a smooth transition. The Compensation Committee believes the Agreements promote the objectives of the Company and align with the interests of our stockholders by encouraging continuity of leadership in termination or change in control situations.

The term of each Agreement is for one year and automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless terminated by the Company upon prior written notice to the subject named executive officer. If the subject named executive officer is involuntarily terminated without cause (as defined below) or if the subject named executive officer voluntarily terminates his employment for good reason (as defined below), then (i) the executive will receive salary continuation payments (at the rate in effect on the day before his termination) for 18 months following termination (other than with respect to Mr. Miller, who will receive continued payments for 24 months) (the “Severance Period”), (ii) the executive will receive continuation coverage during the Severance Period under the Company’s medical, dental, life, disability and other welfare benefit plans, and (iii) all awards held by the executive under our 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan or 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan will continue to vest and, if applicable, be exercisable during the Severance Period as if the executive had continued his employment for the duration of the Severance Period.

Under each Agreement, “cause” is defined as (i) behavior of the subject executive which is adverse to the Company’s interests, (ii) the subject executive’s dishonesty, criminal charge or conviction, grossly negligent misconduct, willful misconduct, acts of bad faith, or neglect of duty or (iii) the subject executive’s material breach of the Agreement.

Under each Agreement, “good reason” means, without the subject executive’s express written consent, (i) the material diminution of the subject executive’s title, duties, authority or responsibilities relative to the subject executive’s duties, authority or responsibilities as in effect immediately prior to such reduction, or the assignment to the subject executive of such reduced duties, authority or responsibilities, (ii) a substantial reduction, without good business reasons, of the facilities and perquisites (including office space and location) available to the subject executive immediately prior to such reduction, (iii) a material reduction of the subject executive’s base salary or annual bonus opportunity, each as in effect as of the effective date of the Agreement, (iv) a material reduction in the kind or level of employee benefits, including additional bonus opportunities, to which the subject executive was entitled immediately prior to such reduction with the result that the subject executive’s overall benefits package is significantly reduced, (v) upon a change of control (as defined below), the failure of the Company to obtain the assumption of the Agreement by the successor, (vi) upon a change of control, the transfer of the subject executive’s principal place of employment to a location that is more than 100 miles from the subject executive’s principal place of employment immediately prior to the change of control, or (vii) any act or set of facts or circumstances that would, under case law or statute, constitute a constructive termination of the subject executive, provided, in each case, that the subject executive terminates employment within 60 days of the occurrence of such circumstances.

Each Agreement provides that if, during the period beginning one year prior to a change of control (as defined below) and ending one year following the change in control, the subject executive is terminated without cause (as defined above) or if the subject executive voluntarily terminates his employment for good reason (as defined above), then (i) the subject executive will receive a lump sum payment equal to three times the subject executive’s annual base salary (as in effect on the day prior to the date of such termination), (ii) the subject executive will receive continuation coverage under the Company’s medical, dental, life, disability and other welfare benefit for 18 months following termination (other than with respect to Mr. Miller, who will receive a lump sum cash stipend equal to 24 times the portion of the monthly premium that would have been paid by the Company for the same level of health and dental coverage he had in effect immediately prior to such termination), and (iii) all equity awards held by the subject executive under our 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan or 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan will immediately vest on the later of the date of termination or the date of the change of control, and if applicable, these equity awards will continue to be

exercisable for 18 months (or with respect to Mr. Miller, 24 months) following the subject executive’s termination as if the executive had remained an employee of the Company. As a condition to Mr. Miller receiving any benefits under his Agreement, Mr. Miller will be required to execute a waiver and release agreement.

Each Agreement defines a “change of control” as (i) a person acquiring 35% or more of the voting power of the Company, (ii) a change in the composition of our Board of Directors during any 12-month period as a result of which less than a majority of the directors are “incumbent directors” (as defined in each Agreement), (iii) a merger or consolidation of the Company (unless it still controls a majority of the voting stock), (iv) a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company, or (v) a sale, disposition, lease, or exchange of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets or of one of the significant operating divisions, including the retail and credit segment.

By entering into their respective Agreements, each of the subject executives agreed to be subject to and bound by the confidentiality, non-compete, non-disclosure and non-solicitation provisions therein.

On December 3, 2013, the Company entered into an amendment to the Agreement with each of Mr. Poppe and Mr. Trahan which, in each case, provides that if payments under their respective Agreements that are triggered by a change of control would be subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”), then the payments either (i) would be reduced by the amount needed to avoid triggering the excise tax or (ii) would not be reduced, depending on which alternative left the subject executive in the best after-tax position. Before these amendments, the applicable Agreements provided that payments thereunder would be reduced by the amount needed to avoid triggering the excise tax.

On December 2, 2015, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted an Executive Severance Plan for senior officers (the “Severance Plan”). Participation in the Severance Plan is limited to officers of the Company with a title of Vice President or more senior, and other employees who are designated by the Committee, provided that no person or officer who is otherwise party to an individual agreement with the Company providing for severance benefits may participate in the Severance Plan. Each of Todd F. Renaud (Vice President and Chief Information Officer) and Brian A. Daly (Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer) are participants in the Severance Plan and are not otherwise party to an Agreement. Mr. Renaud, Mr. Daly, and other Vice Presidents are eligible to receive a cash severance benefit equal to 50% of such participant’s annual base salary if the individual is terminated for any reason other than (i) resignation from employment, (ii) cause (as defined in the Severance Plan), (iii) death or (iv) disability (as defined in the Severance Plan). Such benefit is to be paid in substantially equal installments on the Company’s regularly scheduled payroll dates for the six months following the participant’s termination (the “Executive Severance Period”). In addition to the cash severance payment, participants (and their eligible dependents) will also be entitled to receive continued coverage under the Company’s group health plan during the Executive Severance Period at the same cost paid by active employees. The Severance Plan may be amended or terminated by the Compensation Committee at any time; provided, however, that (i) no amendment materially adverse to any Severance Plan participant will be effective without such participant’s written consent until one year after its adoption, and (ii) termination of the Severance Plan will not be effective until one year following Compensation Committee or other corporate action authorizing termination of the Severance Plan.

In addition to the Severance Plan, upon a change of control (as defined in our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan) all unvested RSUs that have been held by each of Mr. Renaud and Mr. Daly for at least six months will fully vest under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

The following table provides the quantitative disclosure of the severance and change of control payments that would be made to our named executive officers assuming the applicable payment event occurred on January 31, 2017:

Fiscal 2017 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control


Named Executive Officer⁽¹⁾	Benefit	Voluntary Termination for Good Reason ($)⁽⁵⁾1/31/17		Involuntary Not for Cause Termination ($)⁽⁵⁾ 1/31/17		Normal Retirement ($) 1/31/17		Change in Control with Voluntary Termination for Good Reasons ($)⁽⁶⁾1/31/17		Change in Control with Involuntary Not for Cause Termination ($)⁽⁶⁾ 1/31/17		Change in Control without Termination ($) 1/31/17		Death or Disability ($) 1/31/17
Norman L. Miller	In-the-Money Stock Options		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Restricted Stock Units	$	1,042,062	$	1,042,062		—	$	1,460,784	$	1,460,784		—		—
	Performance-Based RSUs⁽²⁾	$	418,722	$	418,722		—	$	837,443	$	837,443		—		—
	Cash Severance	$	1,750,000	$	1,750,000		—	$	2,625,000	$	2,625,000		—		—
	Welfare Benefits⁽³⁾	$	57,868	$	57,868		—	$	57,868	$	57,868		—		—
	Total	$	3,268,652	$	3,268,652		—	$	4,981,095	$	4,981,095		—		—
Lee A. Wright	In-the-Money Stock Options		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Restricted Stock Units	$	330,369	$	330,369		—	$	660,738	$	660,738		—		—
	Performance-Based RSUs⁽²⁾		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Cash Severance	$	720,000	$	720,000		—	$	1,440,000	$	1,440,000		—		—
	Welfare Benefits⁽³⁾	$	43,401	$	43,401		—	$	43,401	$	43,401		—		—
	Total	$	1,093,770	$	1,093,770		—	$	2,144,139	$	2,144,139		—		—
Thomas R. Moran⁽⁷⁾	In-the-Money Stock Options		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Restricted Stock Units	$	359,346	$	359,346		—	$	359,197	$	359,197		—		—
	Performance-Based RSUs⁽²⁾	$	143,560	$	143,560		—	$	215,340	$	215,340		—		—
	Cash Severance	$	675,000	$	675,000		—	$	1,350,000	$	1,350,000		—		—
	Welfare Benefits⁽³⁾	$	43,401	$	43,401		—	$	43,401	$	43,401		—		—
	Total	$	1,221,307	$	1,221,307		—	$	1,967,938	$	1,967,938		—		—
Michael J. Poppe	In-the-Money Stock Options	$	567,150	$	567,150		—	$	567,150	$	567,150		—		—
	Restricted Stock Units	$	867,496	$	867,496		—	$	1,222,821	$	1,222,821		—		—
	Performance-Based RSUs⁽²⁾	$	250,996	$	250,996		—	$	289,621	$	289,621		—		—
	Cash Severance	$	690,000	$	690,000		—	$	1,380,000	$	1,380,000		—		—
	Welfare Benefits⁽³⁾	$	43,401	$	43,401		—	$	43,401	$	43,401		—		—
	Total	$	2,419,043	$	2,419,043		—	$	3,502,993	$	3,502,993		—		—
Brian A. Daly	In-the-Money Stock Options		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Restricted Stock Units⁽⁴⁾		—		—		—	$	204,625	$	204,625		—		—
	Performance-Based RSUs⁽²⁾		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Cash Severance		—	$	150,000		—		—		—		—		—
	Welfare Benefits⁽³⁾		—	$	14,467		—		—	$	14,467		—		—
	Total		—	$	164,467		—	$	204,625	$	219,092		—		—
Todd F. Renaud	In-the-Money Stock Options		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Restricted Stock Units⁽⁴⁾		—		—		—	$	284,113	$	284,113		—		—
	Performance-Based RSUs⁽²⁾		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Cash Severance		—	$	150,000		—		—		—		—		—
	Welfare Benefits⁽³⁾		—	$	14,467		—		—	$	14,467		—		—
	Total		—	$	164,467		—	$	284,113	$	298,580		—		—

(1)	If a named executive officer is terminated for “cause” (as defined under the applicable agreement/plan/program), all such executive’s rights to payment would be automatically forfeited.

(2)	Assumes for purposes of change-in-control with termination that payout for the performance-based RSUs will be at target.

(3)

Amount reported reflects the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) premium for family coverage under our group health plans for the following benefit continuation periods with respect to: (i) Mr. Miller, 24 months, (ii) Messrs. Wright, Moran, and Poppe, 18 months, and (iii) Mr. Daly and Mr. Renaud, six months. Amount does not include the value of the continuation coverage available under our life, disability and other welfare benefit plans.

(4)

This amount assumes accelerated vesting of Mr. Daly’s and Mr. Renaud’s unvested RSUs (i) assuming a change of control (as defined in our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan) occurred on January 31, 2017, and (ii) only with respect to their respective RSUs which would have been outstanding for at least six months as of January 31, 2017. The amount is calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on January 31, 2017.

(5)

As described above under “Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements – Executive Severance Agreements,” in connection with a “Voluntary Termination for Good Reason” or an “Involuntary Not for Cause Termination,” such amounts reflect those benefits which Mr. Miller, Mr. Wright, and Mr. Poppe would have been entitled to had such event occurred on January 31, 2017, including (i) 18 months base salary (in the case of Mr. Miller, 24 months), (ii) continuation under the Company’s medical, dental, life, disability and other welfare benefit during such applicable severance period, and (iii) continued vesting of equity awards during the applicable severance period.

(6)	The amounts reported are the maximum amounts and do not reflect any potential cutbacks triggered by application of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code under the terms of the applicable agreement/plan/program.

(7)

As described above under “Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements - Executive Severance Agreements,” in connection with a “Voluntary Termination for Good Reason” or an “Involuntary Not for Cause Termination,” such amounts reflect those benefits which Mr. Moran would have been entitled to had such event occurred on January 31, 2017, including (i) 18 months base salary, (ii) continuation under the Company’s medical, dental, life, disability and other welfare benefit during such applicable severance period, and (iii) continued vesting of equity awards during the applicable severance period.

Indemnification Arrangements

As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, we have adopted provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws that provide for the indemnification of our directors and certain executive officers, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. These provisions, among other things, provide for the indemnification of each of our directors and certain officers for certain expenses, including judgments, fines and amounts paid in settling or otherwise disposing of actions or threatened actions, incurred by reason of the fact that such person was a director or officer of the Company or of any other corporation which such person served in any capacity at the request of the Company.

In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors pursuant to which we will indemnify them against judgments, claims, damages, losses and expenses incurred as a result of the fact that any director, in his capacity as a director, is made or threatened to be made a party to any suit or proceeding. The indemnification agreements also provide for the advancement of certain expenses (such as attorney’s fees, witness fees, damages, judgments, fines and settlement costs) to our directors in connection with any such suit or proceeding.

We maintain a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy to insure our directors and officers against certain losses resulting from acts committed by them in their capacities as our directors and officers, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures

The Company believes that sound corporate governance practices are essential to maintain the trust of our stockholders, customers, employees and other stakeholders. We believe we operate under governance practices that are transparent, up-to-date and appropriate for our industry. The following materials are related to our corporate governance and related matters:

•

Audit Committee Charter

•

Compensation Committee Charter

•

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter

•

Credit Risk and Compliance Committee Charter

•

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Employees

•

Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, President and Senior Financial Professionals

•

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors

•

Whistle Blower Policy

•

Corporate Governance Guidelines

•

Amended and Restated Insider Trading Policy

Each of the aforementioned is available on the Company’s website at ir.conns.com. There were no amendments to, or waivers from, any of our Codes of Business Conduct for any of our named executive officers during fiscal 2017.

Lead Independent Director

Our Board of Directors determined at its meeting held in August 2012 that our interests would be better served by the designation and appointment of a lead independent director, and appointed Bob L. Martin to serve in that capacity until his successor is appointed. The lead independent director is responsible for coordinating the activities of the independent directors of the Board of Directors, and shall perform such other duties and assume such other responsibilities as the Board may determine. Certain of the specific responsibilities of the lead independent director are to:

•

Act as the principal liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman of the Board;

•

Develop the agenda for and preside at executive sessions of the independent directors;

•

Approve with the Chairman of the Board the agenda for Board and committee meetings and the need for special meetings of the Board;

•

Advise the Chairman of the Board as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the information submitted by the Company’s management that is necessary or appropriate for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties;

•

Recommend to the Board the retention of advisors and consultants who report directly to the Board;

•

Interview, along with the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, all Board candidates and make recommendations to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;

•

Assist the Board and Company officers in better ensuring compliance with and implementation of the Corporate Governance Guidelines;

•

Serve as Chairman of the Board when the Chairman is not present; and

•

Serve as a liaison for consultation and communication with stockholders.

In March 2017, the independent members of the Board re-appointed Mr. Bob Martin as the Lead Independent Director. Mr. Martin has significant Board experience and has served on the Company’s Board since 2003 and on other public company boards, as well as serving as the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Chair of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Martin serves as a liaison between Mr. Miller and the other independent directors, and his longevity on the Board enhances this leadership role and provides for continuity among the non-employee directors.

Separation of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

The Board has determined that the most appropriate form of leadership for the Board of Directors currently is for the CEO, who is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Company, to serve as Chairman, with strong and independent oversight by the Lead Independent Director and the other non-management directors. The Board of Directors appointed Mr. Miller to succeed Mr. Theo Wright as Chairman of the Board upon the completion of Mr. Theo Wright’s term in May 2016. As discussed above under the section “Corporate Governance – Lead Independent Director,” the independent directors have re-appointed Mr. Martin as the Lead Independent Director.

The Board believes that the combined role promotes a unified direction and leadership for the Board and gives a single, clear focus for the chain of command for our organization, strategy and business plans. In addition, the Board believes that the combined position enables decisive leadership, ensures clear accountability, and enhances our ability to communicate our message and strategy clearly and consistently to our stockholders, employees and customers. However, the Board does not have a fixed policy regarding the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer and believes that it should maintain the flexibility to select the Chairman of the Board and its Board leadership structure, from time to time, based on the criteria that it deems to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Risk Oversight

The Board is actively involved in oversight of risks that could affect the Company. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks we face, while the Board, as a whole and through its committees, including its Audit Committee and its Credit Risk and Compliance Committee, has the responsibility for oversight of risk management. The Audit Committee is charged by its charter with the responsibility to review and discuss the Company’s policies and practices with respect to risk assessment and risk management at each of its regularly scheduled meetings, and to report to the Board of Directors various areas of risk, including technology, regulatory, liquidity and operational, that should receive further attention and discussions among the Board of Directors and Company management. The Credit Risk and Compliance Committee provides oversight of the Company’s credit risk and underwriting policies and practices. Our management presents specifically to the Audit Committee, the Credit Risk and Compliance Committee, and the Board of Directors, as requested, with respect to various areas of risk concerns and management practices relative thereto, including enterprise risk management, which is the subject of oversight by the Audit Committee. Additionally, at various regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings, our management presents on and discusses a particular area of risk, either independently as a result of its assessment of materiality or at the request of the Audit Committee, in addition to its standard general discussion of enterprise risk management. The Audit Committee works regularly with management in assessing and addressing Company policies’ strengths and weaknesses. The full Board of Directors receives at each regularly scheduled meeting, and more often as necessary, a presentation from management on our operations, including presentations regarding liquidity and credit reports and risks. Upon request by the Board of Directors, representatives of management commit to and do subsequently or simultaneously provide to the Board of Directors additional information, revisions and explanations pertaining to their respective areas of management.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

The Company’s Board of Directors has a process for stockholders and other interested parties to send communications to the Board. Communications should be addressed to the intended recipient or recipients and sent by mail to:

Lead Independent Director

c/o Corporate Secretary

Conn’s, Inc.,

4055 Technology Forest Blvd, Suite 210, The Woodlands, Texas 77381

generalcounsel@conns.com

Our General Counsel reviews all communications directed to the Audit Committee and the Chairman of the Audit Committee is promptly notified of any significant communications relating to accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing matters or other significant communication. Communications addressed to a named director are promptly sent to the director. Communications directed to the non-management directors are promptly sent to the Lead Independent Director. All communications submitted to the Board or any committee of the Board will be compiled by the Secretary and submitted to the Lead Independent Director on a periodic basis.

All communications received as described above and intended for the Board of Directors, a committee of the Board of Directors, an individual director, or the non-management directors as a group will be relayed to the appropriate directors.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Biographical Information

The Board elects our executive officers at its meeting immediately following our annual meeting of stockholders. Our executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board and until their successors are elected and qualified or until the earlier of their death, resignation or removal.

The following sets forth certain biographical information regarding our executive officers. For our executive officers who are also directors, you may find their biographies under “Board of Directors – Board of Director Nominees for 2017 – 2018” above.


Name	Age		Position	Length of Service
Norman L. Miller		56	President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board	1 year 7 months
Lee A. Wright		45	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	11 months
Michael J. Poppe		49	President and Chief Operating Officer – Credit and Collections	13 years
Coleman R. Gaines		51	President and Chief Operating Officer – Retail	4 months
George L. Bchara		33	Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer	6 months
Brian A. Daly		46	Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer	1 year 5 months
Todd F. Renaud		46	Vice President and Chief Information Officer	2 years 8 months
Jamie L. Pierce		32	Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer	3 years 3 months
Mark L. Prior		49	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	10 months

Biographical information about Norman L Miller is included above under the caption “Board of Directors – Board of Director Nominees for 2017 – 2018.”

Lee A. Wright was appointed as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Wright served as CEO of Professional Directional Enterprises, Inc., a directional drilling services company, since 2015 and served as its President from 2012 into 2015. Prior to joining Professional Directional Enterprises, he was a Senior Managing Director at the private equity firm of Diamond Castle from 2005 to 2012. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Wright was a Director at DLJ Merchant Banking Partners, a private equity firm. From 1996 to 2000, Mr. Wright was a VP and Associate in CSFB’s Private Equity division and was an analyst from 1994 to 1996 in CSFB’s Investment Banking division. Mr. Wright holds a B.S., magna cum laude, from Washington & Lee University.

Michael J. Poppe was appointed by our Board of Directors as President and Chief Operating Officer, Credit and Collections, on June 2016. Previously, Mr. Poppe was an Executive Vice President and our Chief Operating Officer from April 2012 until June 2016. From February 2008 until April 2012, Mr. Poppe served as our Chief Financial Officer. He served as our Controller and Assistant Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Treasurer between September 2004 and February 2008. In the 14 years prior to his joining us, Mr. Poppe served in various accounting and finance management positions in public accounting at Arthur Andersen LLP and in automotive retail companies, most recently as Vice President and Corporate Controller of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. From January 1997 until May 2004, Mr. Poppe worked at Group 1, a New York Stock Exchange listed Fortune 500 company. and was a member of the founding management team. Mr. Poppe is a certified public accountant and obtained his B.B.A. in accounting and finance from Texas A&M University.

Coleman R. Gaines was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer, Retail, in February 2017. Previously, Mr. Gaines served as Executive Vice President (“EVP”) of TMX Finance (“TMX”), a consumer finance company based in Savannah, Georgia, from January 2016 to January 2017. During his employment with TMX starting in 2010, Mr. Gaines was promoted to roles of increasing responsibility, and by 2016, as EVP of Store Operations, he was responsible for leading 1,300 TMX retail stores in 18 states. Prior to TMX, Mr. Gaines worked for the Tractor Supply Company (“TSC”), a leading publicly traded U.S. retailer offering products for home improvements, agriculture, farm, lawn and garden maintenance, and livestock care, from 2002 to 2010. At TSC, Mr. Gaines’ various responsibilities as a Divisional Vice President included operating 470 TSC stores. Prior to TSC, Mr. Gaines was employed with Scotty’s Home Centers, from 1989 to 2002, starting as an assistant manager and rising to Vice President of Hardware Stores responsible for 70 regional hardware stores. Mr. Gaines holds a B.A. in Theology from Freed Hardeman University.

George L. Bchara joined the Company as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in December 2016. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of BankUnited, based in Miami Lakes, Florida, from March 2013 to December 2016, and served as Vice President and Loan Controller from June 2011 to February 2013. Prior to BankUnited, Mr. Bchara was a Manager with the global professional services firm, PwC, where he worked from January 2007 until May 2011. Mr. Bchara holds an M.B.A. in Finance and Entrepreneurial Management from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in Accounting and Finance from Florida State University. Mr. Bchara is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in the State of New York and a Chartered Financial Analyst charterholder.

Brian A. Daly was appointed Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer in November 2015. Prior to joining the Company, from June 2007 until November 2015, Mr. Daly served in several positions with DFC Global Corp, a global alternative financial services company, including as Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer. Prior to DFC Global, he worked in human resources and operational leadership roles at Marsh & McLennan, from 2006 to 2007, ARAMARK Corporation from 2000 to 2005, and Florida, Power & Light from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Daly has a B.S. in Management from the University of Richmond and an M.B.A. – Human Resources and Finance from the University of Florida.

Todd F. Renaud joined the Company as Vice President and Chief Information Officer in August of 2014 with over 20 years of technology experience across multiple industries. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Renaud served as Vice President, Management Information Systems for Security Service Federal Credit Union. Prior to joining SSFCU in 2002, he worked as Director of Technology for Enron Corporation. Mr. Renaud is a graduate of Texas A&M University where he earned a BBA in Management Information Systems.

Jamie L. Pierce joined the Company as Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer in January 2014 and has over 10 years of retail marketing experience. From May 2010 to January 2014, Ms. Pierce served as Senior Director of Marketing and Communication for Tempur Sealy International, Inc. From June 2007 through May 2010, Ms. Pierce held several positions at the Whirlpool Corporation in both Sales and Marketing, including Senior Sales Manager. From March 2004 through June 2007, Ms. Pierce worked for DURA Automotive Systems, Inc., where she held several positions of increasing responsibility, including Marketing Manager. Ms. Pierce holds an M.B.A. from Michigan State University.

Mark L. Prior was appointed the Company’s Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in July 2016. Previously, from March 2007 to July 2016, Mr. Prior was employed by DFC Global Corp as General Counsel and Deputy General Counsel, Senior Vice President and Secretary. Previously, he was Corporate Counsel for the Philadelphia Stock Exchange from August 2005 to March 2007 and firm partner with Rubin Fortunato, P.C., from September 1998 to July 2005. Mr. Prior holds a B.A. from Dickinson College, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, and a J.D. from Penn State University – Dickinson Law. Mr. Prior is licensed in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS

Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan

In February 2003, we adopted our Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan, and amended the plan in both June 2004 and May 2006. The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. Our employees and employees of our subsidiaries, subject to certain exclusions, are eligible to participate in the plan. Option grants have been made at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, for such terms as the Compensation Committee may determine, but not for terms greater than ten years from the date of grant. The maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under this plan is 3,859,767 shares, subject to adjustment. All options issued vest equally over a five-year term or less, as determined in connection with each grant. At January 31, 2017, there were options to purchase 832,812 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding under the plan. No further grants will be made under the Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan.

2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan

In May 2011, our stockholders approved our 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. Our employees and employees of our subsidiaries, subject to certain exclusions, are eligible to participate in the plan. The maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under this plan is 1,200,000 shares, subject to adjustment and a cap of 300,000 to any one participant in any one taxable year. RSUs that have been issued under the plan vest on various time horizons, depending on the recipient and the criteria of measurement for performance-based RSUs, but none longer than five years. At January 31, 2017, there were time-based RSUs issued that are convertible to 253,247 shares of our Common Stock. No further grants will be made under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In February 2003, we adopted our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The ESPP was amended on November 30, 2011 to permit highly compensated employees to participate. The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. Our employees and employees of our subsidiaries, subject to certain exclusions, are eligible to participate in the plan. Eligible employees are able to purchase shares of our Common Stock without brokerage commissions and at a discount from market prices. The maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under this plan is 1,267,085 shares, subject to adjustment. At January 31, 2017, there were 402,504 shares issued and 864,581 shares available for future issuance under the plan.

2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan

In February 2003, we adopted the 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. The maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under this plan is 600,000 shares, subject to adjustment. All options issued to a director when he or she becomes a director currently vest equally over a three-year term, while those issued to a director on his fourth anniversary date and those issued immediately following each annual stockholders’ meeting upon the director’s election by the stockholders as a director, vest on the first anniversary date of the grant. As a result of the approval by the stockholders of the 2011 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, discussed below, the Compensation Committee has determined at this time to issue no further options under this 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. At January 31, 2017, there were options to purchase 110,000 shares of our Common Stock under this plan and 90,000 shares remaining for future issuance under the plan.

2011 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan

In May 2011 our stockholders approved our 2011 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan. The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. Only our non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the plan. The maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under this plan is 300,000 shares. Only restricted stock and RSUs may be awarded under the Plan. RSUs that have been issued under the Plan have one-year vesting periods. At January 31, 2017, there were RSUs issued to purchase 46,543 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding under the plan and 143,603 shares remaining for future issuance under the plan.

2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Our Board, in March 2016, and our stockholders, in May 2016, approved our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee and replaces our 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan and our Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan. The maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under this plan, as initially adopted, is 1,200,000 shares. All options issued vest equally over a five-year term or less, as determined in connection with each grant. At January 31, 2017, there were options to purchase 100,000 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding under the plan. Additionally, at January 31, 2017, there were PSUs issued that are convertible into a minimum of 0 shares and a maximum of 197,639 shares of our Common Stock, determinable by the performance of our Company over a stated period of time ending January 31, 2016. At January 31, 2017, there were RSUs issued that are convertible into 610,384 shares of our Common Stock and 809,052 shares remaining for future issuance under the plan. This includes 347,285 shares that remain available for grant under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan as a result of awards forfeited under previous plans. As of April 1, 2017, the Company had ~~368,324~~ 70,539 shares remaining that are available to grant under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

The table below provides information regarding the number of shares of our Common Stock that may be issued on exercise of outstanding stock options and will be issued under RSU awards under our existing equity compensation plans as of January 31, 2017. These plans are as follows:

•

the Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan;

•

the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan;

•

the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan;

•

the 2011 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan;

•

the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and

•

the Employee Stock Purchase Program.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

Plan Category

Number of
Securities to be
Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(a)

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)

Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future
Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans
(Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column (a))

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders

1,447,000

12.69

⁽¹⁾

1,907,236

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders

—

Total

1,447,000

12.69

1,907,236

⁽²⁾

(1)

Weighted average remaining life for options outstanding at January 31, 2017 – 3.4 years for 2003 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1.7 for Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, with overall weighted average remaining life for all options outstanding at January 31, 2017 being 4.3 years. Weighted average remaining life for RSU awards outstanding at January 31, 2017 – 0.3 years for Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, 3.5 years for Omnibus Incentive Plan, with overall weighted average remaining life for all RSU awards outstanding at January 31, 2017 being 3.4 years.

(2)

The total of 1,907,236 includes 864,581 shares available under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. As of January 31, 2017, there were RSUs issued that are convertible into 610,384 shares of our Common Stock and 809,052 shares remaining for future issuance under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. This includes 347,285 shares that remain available for grant under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan as a result of awards forfeited under previous plans. As of April 1, 2017, the Company had ~~368,324~~ 70,539 shares remaining that are available to grant under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock for each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our voting securities, for each director and named executive officer, and for all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, each person named below has sole voting and investment power over the shares indicated. For purposes of this table, a person is deemed to be the “beneficial owner” of the number of shares of Common Stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of April 5, 2017 through the exercise of any option, warrant or right, through the conversion of any security, through the power to revoke a trust, discretionary account, or similar arrangement, or through the automatic termination of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement. The percentage of total common shares beneficially owned is based on 30,980,096 common shares outstanding as of April 5, 2017, which is the record date for the annual meeting.


Name	Shares of Common Beneficially Owned		Percent of Common
Warren A. Stephens⁽¹⁾		6,565,709		21.21	%
The Stephens Group, LLC and its affiliates⁽²⁾		4,817,109		15.56	%
Anchorage Capital Group, L.L.C.⁽³⁾		4,553,958		14.71	%
PAR Capital Management, Inc.⁽⁴⁾		1,891,142		6.11	%
Morgan Stanley⁽⁵⁾		1,678,848		5.42	%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP⁽⁶⁾		1,621,682		5.24	%
Norman L. Miller		361,498		1.17	%
Lee A. Wright		~~121,335~~201,259		*
Thomas R. Moran		3,123		*
Michael J. Poppe⁽⁷⁾		273,167		*
David W. Trahan		0		*
Brian A. Daly		~~39,361~~65,252		*
Todd F. Renaud		~~49,529~~75,420		*
Bob L. Martin⁽⁸⁾		53,881		*
Douglas H. Martin⁽⁹⁾		102,012		*
William (David) Schofman		18,549		*
William E. Saunders, Jr.		20,027		*
Oded Shein		7,392		*
James H. Haworth		7,392		*
Kelly Malson		19,638		*
All Directors and Executive Officers, as a group (14 persons)		~~1,076,904~~1,208,610		~~3.48%~~3.90	%

*	Represents less than 1% of the outstanding Common Stock.

⁽¹⁾

The address of Warren A. Stephens is 111 Center Street, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72201. Includes 2,727,920 shares owned by Stephens Investments Holdings LLC as to which Mr. Stephens, as Manager of the LLC, may be deemed to have sole voting power and sole dispositive power. Also includes 82,430 shares owned by Stephens Inc. as to which Mr. Stephens, as President of Stephens Inc., may be deemed to have sole voting power and sole dispositive power, and 203,486 shares held in discretionary trading accounts on behalf of clients of Stephens Inc. as to which Mr. Stephens, as President of Stephens Inc., may be deemed to have shared voting power and shared dispositive power. Also includes 6,352 shares owned by each of Warren Miles Amerine Stephens Trust, John Calhoun Stephens Trust, and Laura Whitaker Stephens Trust, as to which Mr. Stephens, as sole Trustee of the trusts, has sole voting power and sole dispositive power. Also includes 183,283 shares owned by Harriet C. Stephens Trust, 385,350 shares owned by Warren A. Stephens Grantor Trust, 206,116 shares owned by WAS Conn’s Annuity Trust One, and 56,633 shares owned by each of Warren M. A. Stephens 95 Trust, John Calhoun Stephens 95 Trust, and Laura Whitaker Stephens 95 Trust, as to which Harriet C. Stephens is Trustee and as to which Mr. Stephens may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power with Ms. Stephens. Also includes 931,038 shares owned by Warren & Harriet Stephens Childrens Trust, Harriet C. Stephens, Co-Trustee, as to which Mr. Stephens may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power with Ms. Stephens. Also includes 430,000 shares owned by WAS Family Trust One, Harriet C. Stephens, Trustee, as to which Mr. Stephens may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power with Ms. Stephens. Also includes 500,000 shares owned by Paula W. and John P. Calhoun Family Trust UID 6-29-2016, as to which Mr. Stephens, as Trustee, may be deemed to have shared voting power and shared dispositive power with Ms. Stephens. Also includes 11,000 shares owned by Harriet and Warren Stephens Family Foundation as to which Mr. Stephens, as co-trustee, may be deemed to have shared voting power and shared dispositive power with Ms. Stephens. Also includes 22,619 shares owned by Warren Miles Amerine Stephens 2012 Trust, Harriet C. Stephens, Trustee, as to which Mr. Stephens may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power with Ms. Stephens. Also includes 50,000 shares owned by Martin Family 2016 Trust UID 6-14-2016, and 43,730 shares owned by Douglas H. Martin Trust UID 4-18-2014, as to which Mr. Martin, as sole Trustee of the trusts, has sole voting power and sole dispositive power. Also includes 1,633 shares owned directly as to which Mr. Martin has sole voting power and sole dispositive power. Also includes 800 shares owned by Douglas Martin Custodian for Haven Celeste Martin as to which Mr. Martin

has sole voting power and sole dispositive power, and 1,600 shares owned by Mr. Martin’s children as to which Mr. Martin has shared voting and dispositive power pursuant to powers of attorney. Also includes 26,827 shares owned through Roth IRA accounts as to which Mr. Martin has sole voting and dispositive power, and includes 4,250 shares owned through IRA accounts as to which Mr. Martin has sole voting and dispositive power. Also includes 3,100 shares owned by Mr. Martin’s spouse as custodian for a minor child, as to which Mr. Martin may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power. Also includes 1,600 shares owned by a charitable foundation of which Mr. Martin is a co-trustee, as to which Mr. Martin has shared voting and dispositive power. Also includes 40,000 shares which Mr. Martin has the right to receive upon the exercise of options, and as to which Mr. Martin would have sole voting power and sole dispositive power. Also includes 234,972 shares owned by Curtis F. Bradbury, Jr. The information with respect to Warren A. Stephens is based on the Schedule 13D/A filed by such entities and person with the SEC on September 26, 2016.

⁽²⁾

The Stephens Group, LLC and its affiliates address is 100 Morgan Keegan Drive, Suite 500, Little Rock, AR 72202. The beneficial ownership described above includes 4,305,343 shares owned by SG-1890, LLC, for which The Stephens Group, LLC is the manager. Wilton R. Stephens, Jr. and Elizabeth Stephens Campbell have shared power to vote and dispose of such shares as members of the Executive Committee of The Stephens Group, LLC. It also includes 54,163 shares held by Snow Lake Holdings, Inc., 50,755 shares held by the Arden Jewell Stephens 2012 Trust, 50,755 shares held by the W. R. Stephens III 2012 Trust, 373 shares held by the Arden Jewell Stephens Trust dtd 10/20/99, 373 shares held by the W. R. Stephens III Trust dtd 7/2/01, 49,655 shares held by the Elizabeth Chisum Campbell 2012 Trust, 49,655 shares held by the Susan Stephens Campbell 2012 Trust, 49,655 shares held by the Craig Dobbs Campbell, Jr. 2012 Trust, 12,720 shares held by Carol M. Stephens, 140,645 shares owned directly by the W.R. Stephens, Jr. Revocable Trust, to which Mr. Stephens, as sole trustee, has sole power to vote and dispose, 53,017 shares held by the Elizabeth S. Campbell Trust A, to which Mrs. Campbell, as co-trustee, has shared power to vote and dispose All of the above are members of a group with The Stephens Group, LLC. The information with respect to The Stephens Group, LLC are based on the Schedule 13D/A filed by such entities and person with the SEC on July 15, 2015.

⁽³⁾

The shares of Common Stock are held for the account of Anchorage Capital Master Offshore, Ltd., a Cayman Island exempted company (“ACMO”). Anchorage Advisors Management, L.L.C. (“Anchorage Management”) is the sole managing member of Anchorage Capital Group, L.L.C. (“Anchorage Capital Group”), which is the investment advisor to ACMO Kevin M. Ulrich is the Chief Executive Officer of Anchorage Capital Group and the senior managing member of Anchorage Management. The mailing address of ACMO is 610 Broadway, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10012. The information with respect to the ACMO is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed jointly by ACMO, Anchorage Capital Group, Kevin M. Ulrich and Anchorage Management on February 14, 2017.

⁽⁴⁾

PAR Investment Partners, L.P. (“PAR Investment Partners”) holds sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 1,891,142 shares of Common Stock. PAR Group, L.P. (“PAR Group”) is the sole general partner of PAR Investment Partners, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the 1,891,142 shares owned directly by PAR Investment Partners. PAR Capital Management, Inc. (“PAR Capital Management”) is the sole general partner of PAR Group, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the 1,891,142 shares held beneficially by PAR Group. The information with respect to PAR Investment Partners, PAR Group and PAR Capital Management comes from the Schedule 13G filed by such entities with the SEC on February 6, 2017. The mailing address of PAR Capital Management is 200 Clarendon Street, FL 48, Boston, MA 02116.

⁽⁵⁾

Morgan Stanley reported on a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2017, that it held 1,678,848 shares of Common Stock as of December 31, 2016. Morgan Stanley reported that it had sole voting power over 1,646,642 shares, shared voting power over 31,206 shares, and shared dispositive power over all 1,678,848 shares. The address for Morgan Stanley is 1585 Broadway, New York, NY 10036.

⁽⁶⁾

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, a Delaware limited partnership and an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (“Dimensional Fund Advisors”), beneficially owns 1,621,682 shares of Common Stock of which it has sole voting power over 1,601,129 shares. Dimensional Fund Advisors furnishes investment advice to four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manager or sub-adviser to certain other commingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts (such investment companies, trusts and accounts, collectively referred to as the “Dimensional Funds”). In certain cases, subsidiaries of Dimensional Fund Advisors may act as an adviser or sub-adviser to certain Dimensional Funds. In its role as investment advisor, sub-adviser and/or manager, Dimensional Fund Advisors or its subsidiaries (collectively, “Dimensional”) may possess voting and/or investment power over the shares of Common Stock that are owned by the Dimensional Funds, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares held by the Dimensional Funds. However, all shares are owned by the Dimensional Funds. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. The Dimensional Funds have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of the shares held in their respective accounts. Dimensional Fund Advisors disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities. The information with respect to Dimensional Fund Advisors is based on the Schedule 13G filed by the reporting person with the SEC on February 9, 2016.

⁽⁷⁾	Includes options to purchase 115,000 shares of Common Stock.

⁽⁸⁾	Includes options to purchase 40,000 shares of Common Stock.

⁽⁹⁾	Includes options to purchase 40,000 shares of Common Stock.

To our knowledge, except as noted above, no person or entity is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the voting power of Common Stock.

PROPOSAL FIVE:

APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

We are asking our stockholders to approve an amendment to the Conn’s, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”). Our Board of Directors approved the 2016 Plan on March 23, 2016, and our stockholders approved the 2016 Plan at the Annual Meeting on May 25, 2016. The 2016 Plan, as amended, is summarized below and the full text of the amended 2016 Plan (the “Amended 2016 Plan”) is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A.

We are asking our stockholders to approve the Amended 2016 Plan to:

•

increase the number of shares of our common stock available for future awards to be granted under the Amended 2016 Plan by 1,400,000 shares (i.e., from 1,200,000 shares to 2,600,000 shares);

•

increase the maximum number of shares of our common stock with respect to which equity-based awards may be granted to any participant in any calendar year from 300,000 shares to 600,000 shares (which limit is multiplied by two in the year a participant commences employment); and

•

increase the maximum amount that may be payable with respect to performance cash awards granted to any participant in any calendar year from $3,000,000 to $6,000,000 (which limit is multiplied by two in the year a participant commences employment).

If the Amended 2016 Plan is approved by our stockholders, the Company will have an additional 1,400,000 shares of common stock available for future equity awards. If the Amended 2016 Plan is not approved by our stockholders, we will not have sufficient shares remaining under the 2016 Plan to provide for equity-based compensation. As of April 1, 2017, the Company had ~~368,324~~ 70,539 shares remaining and available to grant under the 2016 Plan. As a result, the Company would be required to increase significantly the cash component of our executive compensation program in order to remain competitive and adequately recruit, retain and reward our key executives and employees. Such a significant change in our long-term incentive program could cause significant misalignment between executive and stockholder interests.

We believe that equity-based incentive awards are critical to attracting, retaining and engaging highly qualified employees and to aligning their financial interests with the financial interests of our stockholders. In 2016, we proposed and our stockholders approved the 2016 Plan, which reserved 1,200,000 shares of our common stock for awards to be granted under the 2016 Plan. Since that date, most of the shares reserved in 2016 have been needed for grants to key employees, including:

•

grants to several key executives and employees who were hired in 2016 and 2017; and

•

special retention-based awards granted in February 2017 that were intended to cover prospective equity grants that certain executives and key employees would have received in fiscal years 2018, 2019, and 2020.

In addition, our long-term incentive practice is to grant equity-based compensation awards that have a target value equal to a dollar amount that the Compensation Committee determines is competitive with the target value of long-term incentive awards granted by our peers, thereby allowing us to compete for critical talent, and to retain and drive the performance of our executives and key employees. Because our share value has declined since March 2016, a larger number of shares have been, and in the immediate future will be, needed to grant awards that correspond with these target values. Our Board recommends that stockholders approve the Amended 2016 Plan to allow us to continue to provide the incentives needed to drive Company growth.

Stockholder approval of the Amended 2016 Plan will also constitute approval of the material terms of the performance goals under the Amended 2016 Plan, including the per person limits that apply to awards under the Amended 2016 Plan, for purposes of satisfying the stockholder approval requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code and the rules and regulations thereunder, so that the Compensation Committee will continue to have the discretion to grant equity- and cash-based awards that meet the requirements of “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m). Stockholder approval of the Amended 2016 Plan will also constitute approval of the number of shares that may be subject to options granted as incentive stock options (“ISOs”) under Section 422 of the Code.

Overhang

The following table provides information regarding our equity incentive program overhang as of January 31, 2017.


	As of January 31, 2017
Total number of common shares subject to outstanding stock options		509,000
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options	$	14.62
Weighted-average remaining term of outstanding stock options		4.3 years
Total number of common shares subject to outstanding full value awards		938,000
Total number of common shares available for future grants under the 2016 Plan		809,052
Total number of common shares available for future grants under other equity incentive plans (excluding the ESPP)		233,603
Total number of shares of common shares outstanding		30,658,022

Burn Rate

The following table provides detailed information regarding the activity related to our equity incentive plans for fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017.


	Fiscal Year 2017			Fiscal Year 2016			Fiscal Year 2015
Total number of shares of common stock subject to stock options granted		100,000			0			0
Total number of shares of common stock subject to full value awards granted		755,000			389,000			182,000
Weighted-average basic number of common shares outstanding		30,776,000			35,084,000			36,232,000
Share Usage Rate		2.78	%		1.11	%		0.50	%

Key Plan Features

The Board believes that the Amended 2016 Plan has been and will continue to be effective in attracting and retaining highly qualified employees and has provided incentives designed to align the economic interests of participants with our shareholders.


	2016 Plan	Amended 2016 Plan
Authorized Shares	1,200,000	2,600,000
Maximum Number of Shares Per Participant (annually), doubled in first year of employment	300,000	600,000
Maximum Amount Payable under Performance Cash Awards Per Participant (annually), doubled in first year of employment	$3,000,000	$6,000,000
Share Counting Provisions	Shares withheld or tendered as payment for an award or taxes are not added to the number of shares available for grant	Same


Repricing of Options and SARs	Prohibited with respect to options and SARs	Same
Minimum Vesting Requirement	Contains one-year minimum vesting requirement	Same
Dividends; Dividend Equivalents	Not available for stock options or SARs	Not available for stock options or SARs; Dividends and dividend equivalents on other awards are subject to same vesting conditions as underlying award
Clawbacks	All awards will be subject to any clawback policy	Same
Vesting Upon a Change in Control	Double trigger; no automatic vesting of awards	Same
Evergreen Provisions	No “evergreen” feature pursuant to which the shares authorized for issuance under the 2016 Plan can be increased automatically without stockholder approval	Same

Number of Shares Requested

In determining the additional number of shares to make available under the Amended 2016 Plan, the Compensation Committee considered the key historical stock usage data under the Company’s equity compensation plans, including the number of shares subject to awards that have been granted contingent on stockholder approval, as described below, the current fair market value of the Company’s common stock, the advice of F.W. Cook, its independent compensation consultant, and the estimated cost and dilution of the Amended 2016 Plan. The Compensation Committee also considered many factors that affect the number of shares required for long-term incentive equity awards, such as changes in stock price over the life of the plan, the number of participants in the program and the size of awards to each participant. Considering all of these factors, the Compensation Committee determined that 1,400,000 additional shares is a prudent amount to satisfy the long-term incentive goals of the Amended 2016 Plan and also meet the expectations of the stockholders for minimal levels of dilution.

Our average share usage rate, sometimes referred to as our burn rate, over the three years ended January 31, 2017 (calculated as equity-based awards granted under our equity compensation plans for the relevant year, divided by the average basic common shares outstanding for that year) is approximately 1.46%. The potential dilution resulting from issuing all shares available for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan, including the 1,400,000 additional shares requested to be authorized, and taking into account outstanding awards, would be 12.6% of common shares outstanding as of the Record Date.

Stock options granted under the Amended 2016 Plan may be either incentive stock options or non-statutory (also known as “non-qualified”) stock options. Subject to early termination provisions, options may have a term of up to 10 years from the date of grant, provided, however, an incentive stock option granted to an employee who owns stock representing more than 10% of the voting power of our stock on the date of the grant may not have a term greater than five years. Each option would be exercisable at such time as may be determined by the Compensation Committee, including upon the achievement of specified performance criteria and/or employment or service with the Company for a specified period of time. However, the vesting may accelerate under certain conditions. The exercise price for the stock options will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion at the time of the award and set forth in the award agreement, but cannot be less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of the grant (if an incentive stock option is being granted to an employee who, at the date of grant, owns more than 10% of our voting power, the exercise price cannot be less than 110% of the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant). The Compensation

Committee will determine the methods and form of payment for the exercise price of an option, including, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, payment in Company common stock. The holder of an option will not be entitled to receive dividend equivalents with respect to the number of shares subject to such option.

A restricted stock award is a grant of shares of Company common stock subject to a risk of forfeiture, restrictions on transferability, and any other restrictions imposed by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. Restrictions may lapse at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Compensation Committee (including satisfaction of specified performance criteria or the participant’s continuing employment or service with the Company for a specified period of time). Restricted stock awards will have the same voting, dividend (other than extraordinary dividends), liquidation and other rights as unrestricted shares of the Company’s common stock, except that any dividends will be subject to the same restrictions that apply to the related shares subject to the award. The Compensation Committee may require a legend to be placed on the stock certificates evidencing the restricted stock award, or noted in a certificateless book-entry stock account, referring to these restrictions until such shares vest.

A restricted stock unit award or RSU, represents a right to receive Company common stock upon vesting, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may impose any vesting conditions, not inconsistent with the Amended 2016 Plan, including the achievement of certain performance criteria and/or employment or service with the Company for a specified period of time. A holder of RSUs has no voting, dividend, liquidation or other rights with respect to shares of common stock underlying the award prior to the participant’s receipt of the Company common stock underlying the award. The applicable award agreement will specify whether the holder of RSUs will be entitled to receive dividend equivalents and whether any such dividend equivalents will be credited with interest or deemed to have been reinvested as additional RSUs. However, any dividend equivalents will be subject to the same restrictions that apply to the related RSUs.

Performance stock awards may be issued under the Amended 2016 Plan, and the issuance of shares of Company common stock pursuant to such performance stock awards will be subject to terms and conditions as determined by the Compensation Committee which are not inconsistent with the requirements of the Amended 2016 Plan, including the achievement of certain performance criteria. The applicable award agreement will specify whether the holder of a performance stock award will be entitled to receive dividend equivalents and whether any such dividend equivalents will be credited with interest or deemed to have been reinvested as additional shares subject to such award. Any dividend equivalents on a performance stock award will be subject to the same restrictions as the shares of common stock subject to such award.

Subject to the minimum vesting requirements described below, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, grant awards of Company common stock free of any restrictions to any employee, officer or independent contractor of the Company.

An SAR is the right to receive an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of one share of Company common stock on the date of exercise or settlement over the grant price of the SAR, as determined by the Compensation Committee and set forth in the award agreement, but which may not be less than fair market value of the Company common stock on the date of grant. SARs will be exercisable or settled as the Compensation Committee determines. The term of an SAR will be for a period determined by the Compensation Committee but will not exceed ten years. SARs may be paid in cash, Company common stock or a combination of cash and stock, as the Compensation Committee provides in the award agreement. The holder of an SAR will not be entitled to receive dividend equivalents with respect to the number of shares subject to such SAR.

Performance cash awards may be granted under the Amended 2016 Plan. The amount payable under a performance cash award will be determined by the Compensation Committee and be subject to such terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, including the achievement of one or more of the performance criteria described below and the rights of the participant upon termination of employment or other service.

Generally, stock-based awards granted under the Amended 2016 Plan will not become fully vested or exercisable prior to the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, except that this restriction will not apply to awards to the extent the aggregate number of shares subject to such awards do not exceed 5% of the total number of shares initially available under the Amended 2016 Plan. This restriction also does not apply to the acceleration of vesting or exercisability upon or after a change in control of the Company or the right of the Compensation Committee to accelerate vesting or exercisability upon a participant’s termination of employment or service. Under the Amended 2016 Plan, (i) in the case of termination due to death or disability, stock options will generally be exercisable for 12 months, and (ii) in the case of termination for any reason other than death or disability, stock options will generally be exercisable for three months after termination. Any unvested restricted stock awards and performance stock awards will be forfeited as of the termination of employment (including as a result of death or disability).

Except in the case of adjustments relating to changes in capitalization or a change in control, the Compensation Committee may not, without stockholder approval, reduce the exercise price or base price of an option or SAR, cancel a previously granted option or SAR in exchange for another option or SAR with a lower exercise price or base price or cancel a previously granted option or SAR in exchange for a cash payment or another award if the fair market value of the stock subject to the option or SAR is less than the exercise price or base price.

Awards made under the Amended 2016 Plan may not be sold, pledged, assigned, or otherwise disposed of other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution. However, the Compensation Committee may permit a participant to transfer of all or a portion of a non-statutory stock option or SAR, other than for value, to certain of the participant’s relatives.

Awards granted under the Amended 2016 Plan are subject to any clawback or recoupment policy that the Company may adopt from time to time, including for the purpose of complying with the SEC rules to be issued in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

The Amended 2016 Plan provides for 1,400,000 additional shares of Company common stock to be available for issuance, all of which may be subject to incentive stock options. Shares subject to an award granted under either the 2016 Plan or one of our prior equity compensation plans that lapses, expires, is forfeited or terminated, or is settled in cash will again become available for future grant under the Amended 2016 Plan. Shares will not become available for future grant under the Amended 2016 Plan if the shares are delivered or withheld to pay withholding taxes or the exercise price of an option or are shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of an option exercise.

No participant may receive in any calendar year equity-based awards covering more than 600,000 shares of Company common stock, and the aggregate amount payable with respect to performance cash awards granted to any participant in any calendar year will not exceed $6,000,000, except that in the year in which an employee commences employment with the Company these limits will be multiplied by two.

In the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Amended 2016 Plan, the board may cause some or all outstanding awards to become fully or partially vested, either upon the change in control or upon a subsequent termination of employment or service, and may provide that any applicable performance criteria will be deemed satisfied at the target or any other level. The board may also cause outstanding awards to terminate in exchange for a cash or stock payment or to be substituted or assumed by the surviving corporation.

If this proposal is approved, we intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 to cover the registration of the additional shares of Company common stock reserved under the Amended 2016 Plan.

Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CONN.” On April 5, 2017, the closing sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $11.50 per share.

Eligible Participants

As of April 1, 2017, approximately 55 employees and 0 non-employee directors would be eligible to participate in the Plan.

Performance-Based Awards.

In order to preserve the deductibility of an award under Section 162(m) of the Code, as discussed below, the Compensation Committee may determine that any award granted to the Chief Executive Officer or any of the three most highly paid executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer will be conditioned on performance goals that are based on criteria allowed under Section 162(m), including any of the following:

•

Net income measures: earnings, net earnings, operating earnings, earnings before taxes, EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes), EBITA (earnings before interest, taxes, and amortization) EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), EBITDAR (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent) and earnings per share;

•

Stock price measures: growth measures and total stockholder return (stock price plus reinvested dividends) relative to a defined comparison group or target and price-earnings multiples;

•

Cash flow measures: net cash flow, net cash flow before financing activities, economic value added (or equivalent metric), debt reduction, debt to equity ratio, or establishment or material modification of a credit facility;

•

Return measures: return on equity, return on average assets, return on capital, risk-adjusted return on capital, return on investors’ capital and return on average equity;

•

Operating measures: operating income, cash from operations, after- tax operating income, sales volumes, same store sales, production volumes, credit portfolio delinquency rate, credit portfolio net charge-off rate, gross margins and production efficiency;

•

Expense measures: overhead cost and general and administrative expense;

•

Asset measures: specified target, or target growth in sales, stores or credit portfolio, market capitalization or market value, proceeds from dispositions, strategic acquisitions, or raising capital;

•

Corporate values measures: ethics, employee or customer satisfaction, legal, enterprise risk management, regulatory, and safety; or

•

Any combination of the above.

The Compensation Committee may select one criterion or multiple criteria for measuring performance, and the measurement may be based upon Company, segment, subsidiary, division, business unit or subunit or asset group performance, or the individual performance of the participant, either absolute or by relative comparison to other companies, other participants or any other external measure of the selected criteria. The applicable performance goals may be applied on a pre- or post-tax basis and may be adjusted in accordance with Section 162(m) to include or exclude objectively determinable components of any performance measure, including foreign exchange gains and losses, asset write downs, acquisitions and divestitures, change in fiscal year, unbudgeted capital expenditures, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, infrequently occurring, nonrecurring or one-time events affecting the Company or its financial statements or changes in law or accounting principles.

If an award is made on this basis, the Compensation Committee will establish goals not later than 90 days after the commencement of the period of services to which the performance criteria relate or, if earlier, within the first quarter of such period. The Compensation Committee has the right for any reason to reduce (but not increase) the award, notwithstanding the achievement of a specified goal. Any payment of an award will be conditioned on the written certification of the Compensation Committee in each case that the performance criteria and any other material conditions were satisfied.

Administration of the Amended 2016 Plan

The Compensation Committee of the Board administers the Amended 2016 Plan. Except as provided in the NASDAQ exemptions, the members of the Compensation Committee must be “non-employee directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, “outside directors” as required under Section 162(m) of the Code and independent directors under the NASDAQ listing rules. Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Bob Martin, Mr. Schofman and Mr. Haworth, each of whom has been determined to be an independent director by our Board of Directors. Subject to applicable law, the Compensation Committee may delegate its authority under the plan to an officer of the Company, except that delegated authority may not apply to awards granted to executive officers.

The Compensation Committee has discretion in determining the type of award, and the terms, restrictions and conditions of each award granted under the Amended 2016 Plan. The Compensation Committee is permitted, in its discretion, to change and/or rescind the terms of any award granted under the Amended 2016 Plan as long as such change or rescission does not adversely affect the rights of the award recipient as stated in the applicable award agreement.

Amendment of the 2016 Plan

The Amended 2016 Plan may be amended or terminated by the board at any time. However, no amendment may adversely affect a participant’s rights under an outstanding award without the participant’s consent. In addition, our stockholders must approve any amendment to increase the number of authorized shares under the Amended 2016 Plan, to extend the term of the Amended 2016 Plan or to adopt any amendment which otherwise requires stockholder approval under the Code or NASDAQ rules, including the repricing of options or SARs.

If any change is made to the Company’s capitalization, such as a stock split, stock combination, stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend, exchange of shares or other recapitalization, merger or otherwise, appropriate adjustments will be made by the Compensation Committee in the number and kind of shares or property available for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan, the number and kind of shares subject to an outstanding awards under the Amended 2016 Plan and the exercise or base price of outstanding options or SARs.

Awards Granted Under 2016 Plan

The following table sets forth the number of RSUs and PSUs granted over the lifetime of the 2016 Plan to the individuals and groups indicated as of April 5, 2017.


Name and Position	Stock Options		Time-Based RSUs		Performance-Based RSUs (PSUs)
Norman L. Miller President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board		100,000		75,107		275,107
Lee Wright Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		—		~~59,259~~1303,259		~~62,076~~71,000
Thomas R. Moran Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		—		19,313		19,313
Michael J. Poppe President and Chief Operating Officer, Credit and Collections		—		74,991		19,742
David W. Trahan President – Retail (retired January 1, 2017)		—		17,597		17,597
Brian Daly Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer		—		~~13,393~~36,393		~~20,109~~23,000
Todd F. Renaud Vice President and Chief Information Officer		—		~~13,393~~36,393		~~20,109~~23,000
Executive Officers Listed Above (7 persons)		100,000		~~273,053~~390,053		~~434,053~~448,759
All employees (other than current Named Executive Officers) (approximately 53 persons)		—		~~251,018~~498,682		~~304,180~~112,000

The closing price of our Common Stock on April 5, 2017 was $11.50.

Federal Tax Effects of Participation in the Amended 2016 Plan

The following discussion is for general information only and is intended to summarize briefly the U.S. federal tax consequences to participants arising from participation in the Amended 2016 Plan. This description is based on current law, which is subject to change (possibly retroactively). The tax treatment of a participant in the Amended 2016 Plan may vary depending on his particular situation and may, therefore, be subject to special rules not discussed below. No attempt has been made to discuss any potential foreign, state, or local tax consequences.

Nonstatutory Stock Options; SARs

Incentive Stock Options. Participants will not realize taxable income upon the grant of a nonstatutory stock option or SAR. Upon the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option or SAR, a participant will recognize ordinary compensation income (subject to withholding by the Company) in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the amount of cash and the fair market value of the common stock received, over (ii) the exercise price (if any) paid. A participant will generally have a tax basis in any shares of common stock received pursuant to the exercise of an SAR, or pursuant to the cash exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, that equals the fair market value of such shares on the date of exercise. The Company will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes that corresponds as to timing and amount with the compensation income recognized by a participant under the foregoing rules.

Participants eligible to receive an incentive stock option will not recognize taxable income on the grant of an incentive stock option. Upon the exercise of an incentive stock option, a participant will not recognize taxable income, although the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock received upon exercise of the incentive stock option or, ISO Stock, over the exercise price will increase the alternative minimum taxable income of the participant, which may cause such participant to incur alternative minimum tax. The payment of any alternative minimum tax attributable to the exercise of an incentive stock option would be allowed as a credit against the participant’s regular tax liability in a later year to the extent the participant’s regular tax liability is in excess of the alternative minimum tax for that year.

Upon the disposition of ISO Stock that has been held for the requisite holding period (at least two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise of the incentive stock option), a participant will recognize capital gain (or loss) equal to the excess (or shortfall) of the amount received in the disposition over the exercise price paid by the participant for the ISO Stock. However, if a participant disposes of ISO Stock that has not been held for the requisite holding period (a “disqualifying disposition”), the participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in the year of the disqualifying disposition in an amount equal to the amount by which the fair market value of the ISO Stock at the time of exercise of the incentive stock option (or, if less, the amount realized in the case of an arm’s length disposition to an unrelated party) exceeds the exercise price paid by the participant for such ISO Stock. A participant would also recognize capital gain to the extent the amount realized in the disqualifying disposition exceeds the fair market value of the ISO Stock on the exercise date. If the exercise price paid for the ISO Stock exceeds the amount realized (in the case of an arm’s-length disposition to an unrelated party), such excess would ordinarily constitute a capital loss.

The Company will not be entitled to any federal income tax deduction upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option, unless the participant makes a disqualifying disposition of the ISO Stock. If the participant makes a disqualifying disposition, the Company will then be entitled to a tax deduction that corresponds as to timing and amount with the compensation income recognized by a participant under the rules described in the preceding paragraph.

Restricted Stock Awards; RSUs; Performance Stock; Common Stock; Performance Cash. A participant will recognize ordinary compensation income as a result of the receipt of common stock or cash pursuant to a restricted stock award, RSU, performance stock award, bonus stock award or performance cash award in an amount equal to the fair market value of the common stock when such stock is received or the amount of cash received, as the case may be; provided, however, that if the stock is not transferable and is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture when received (as in the case of a restricted stock award or performance stock award), a participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the common stock when the common stock first becomes transferable or is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture in cases where a participant (i) does not make a valid election under section 83(b) of the Code or (ii) when the common stock is received in cases where a participant makes a valid election under section 83(b) of the Code.

A participant will be subject to withholding for federal, and generally for state and local, income taxes at the time he recognizes income under the rules described above with respect to common stock received. Dividends that are received by a participant prior to the time that the common stock is taxed to the participant under the rules described in the preceding paragraph are taxed as additional compensation, not as dividend income. The tax basis in the common stock received by a participant will equal the amount recognized by him as compensation income under the rules described in the preceding paragraph, and the participant’s capital gains holding period in those shares will commence on the later of the day after the date the shares are received or the date the restrictions with respect to the shares lapse.

Subject to the discussion below, the Company will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes that corresponds as to timing and amount with the compensation income recognized by a participant under the foregoing rules.

Tax Code Limitations on Deductibility. In order for the amounts described above to be deductible by the Company, such amounts must constitute reasonable compensation for services rendered or to be rendered and must be ordinary and necessary business expenses.

The ability of the Company to obtain a deduction for future payments under the Amended 2016 Plan could also be limited by the golden parachute payment rules of Section 280G of the Code, which prevent the deductibility of certain excess parachute payments made in connection with a change in control of an employer-corporation.

Finally, the ability of the Company to obtain a deduction for amounts paid under the Amended 2016 Plan could be limited by Section 162(m) of the Code, which limits the deductibility, for federal income tax purposes, of compensation paid to certain executive

officers of a publicly traded corporation to $1,000,000 with respect to any such officer during any taxable year of the corporation. However, an exception applies to this limitation in the case of certain performance-based compensation. In order to exempt performance-based compensation from the $1,000,000 deductibility limitation, the grant or vesting of the award relating to the compensation must be based on the satisfaction of one or more performance goals as selected by the Compensation Committee. Although the Amended 2016 Plan has been drafted to satisfy the requirements for the performance-based compensation exception, the Company may determine that it is in its best interests not to satisfy the requirements for the exception.

Special Equity Awards in Fiscal 2018

On February 23, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved, and the Board ratified, special equity awards (the “Special Equity Awards”) to Messrs. Miller, Wright, Daly and Renaud, consisting of RSUs and PSUs and, contingent upon stockholder approval of the Amended 2016 Plan, additional PSUs and RSUs. The number of PSUs, RSUs, contingent PSUs and contingent RSUs awarded to each of Messrs. Miller, Wright, Daly and Renaud is reflected in the following table:

Special Equity Awards

Name and Position

Number of Non-
Contingent
Performance Based
RSUs (PSUs)⁽¹⁾

Number of Non-
Contingent
Time-Based
RSUs⁽²⁾

Number of Contingent
Performance-Based
RSUs⁽²³⁾

Number of
Contingent Time-
Based RSUs⁽³⁴⁾

Norman L. Miller

(President and Chief Executive Officer)

200,000

58,000

258,000

Lee Wright

(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)

~~62,076~~71,000

71,000

~~8,924~~—0

~~71,000~~—0

Michael A. Poppe

(President and Chief Operating Officer, Credit and Collections)

Brian A. Daly

Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

~~20,109~~23,000

23,000

~~2,891~~—0

~~23,000~~—0

Todd F. Renaud

Vice President and Chief Information Officer

~~20,109~~23,000

23,000

~~2,891~~—0

~~23,000~~—0

Executive Group

~~302,294~~317,000

117,000

~~72,706~~58,000

~~375,000~~258,000

Non-Executive Director Group

Non-Executive Officer Employee Group

~~97,921~~112,000

152,000

~~14,079~~—0

~~152,000~~—0

(1)

Represents the amount that could be received by the recipients pursuant to the performance-based restricted stock unit awards assuming performance at the target level are met. The actual payouts under the performance-based RSUs can range from 0% to 150% of the target level, depending on whether the threshold, target, or maximum performance levels are achieved. No payments will be made if the threshold performance level is not met.

(2)

Represents the amount of restricted share stock unit awards, subject to three year ratable vesting schedule based upon date of grant. that could be received by the recipients pursuant to the performance-based restricted stock unit awards, subject to stockholder approval of Proposal 5, assuming performance at the target level are met. The actual payouts under the performance-based RSUs can range from 0% to 150% of the target level, depending on whether the threshold, target, or maximum performance levels are achieved. No payments will be made if the threshold performance level is not met.

(3)

~~(3)~~Represents the amount that could be received by the recipients pursuant to the performance-based restricted share stock unit awards, subject to shareholder approval of Proposal 5, assuming performance at the target level are met. The actual payouts under the performance-based RSUs can range from 0% to 150% of the target level, depending on whether the threshold, target, or maximum performance levels are achieved. No payments will be made if the threshold performance level is not met.

(4)	Represents the amount that could be received by the recipients pursuant to the restricted share stock unit awards, subject to shareholder approval of Proposal 5.

If the stockholders do not approve the Amended 2016 Plan, the foregoing contingent PSU and RSU awards shall not be granted and the Compensation Committee will consider what course of action to follow with respect to future compensation. Contingent upon stockholder approval of the Amended 2016 Plan, the Special Equity Awards are intended to cover the prospective annual equity grants that the recipients would have received in fiscal 2018, fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020.

Other than with respect to the RSUs and performance-based RSUs set forth above, all other awards under the Amended 2016 Plan will be made in the future at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and therefore are not determinable.

We Recommend That You Vote FOR Approval Of

The Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions

The Board has adopted a written statement of policy with respect to all relationships and transactions in which our Company and our directors and executive officers or their immediate family members are participants. The Audit Committee reviews all related party relationships and transactions to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest, and if so, if the transactions are at arm’s length and are acceptable to the Board of Directors. Each related party transaction must be entered into on terms that are comparable to those that could be obtained as a result of arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party to be approved and accepted by the Board of Directors. As required under SEC rules, transactions that are reportable under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K are disclosed in our proxy statement. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews any related person transaction that is required to be disclosed as set forth in the preceding sentence. In the course of its review of these relationships, the Audit Committee observes how each relates to a potential conflict of interest with the Company:

•

the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction;

•

the material terms of the transaction, including, without limitation, the amount and type of transaction, and the timing of the entering of such transaction;

•

the importance of the transaction to the related person;

•

the importance of the transaction to the Company;

•

whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director or executive officer to act in our best interest; and

•

any other matters the committee deems appropriate.

Related Party Transactions

During fiscal 2017, Aaron Trahan, David W. Trahan’s son, was paid a base salary of $222,000 for his service as our Vice President-Merchandising and received 9,911 RSUs with a grant date of December 1, 2016, which vest ratably over 4 years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. His target annual cash bonus was 40% of his fiscal 2017 base salary. Aaron did not receive any discretionary bonus for his services during fiscal 2017. On December 9, 2016, David informed Mr. Miller of his intention to retire from the Company effective January 1, 2017. Aaron voluntarily resigned his position from the Company on December 26, 2016.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our directors, executive officers as well as other persons who own more than 10% of our outstanding Common Stock file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our Common Stock with the SEC. Officers, directors and other stockholders who own more than 10% of our outstanding Common Stock are required by the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. These reports are required to be submitted by specified deadlines, and the Company is required to report in this proxy statement any failure by directors, officers and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of its Common Stock to file such reports on a timely basis during the Company’s most recent fiscal year or, in the case of such a failure that has not previously been so disclosed, prior fiscal years.

To our knowledge, based solely on a review of reports and information furnished to us by those persons who were directors, executive officers and/or the beneficial holders of 10% or more of our Common Stock at any time during fiscal 2017 and upon representations from such persons, we believe that all stock ownership reports required to be filed under Section 16(a) by such reporting persons during fiscal 2017 were timely made, other than one Form 4 filing for Mr. Miller relating to options shares granted on January 2, 2017.

STOCKHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME LAST NAME AND ADDRESS

To reduce the expense of delivering duplicate proxy materials to stockholders who may have more than one account holding our Common Stock but who share the same address, we have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, certain stockholders of record who have the same address and last name, and who do not participate in electronic

delivery of proxy materials, will receive only one copy of our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are delivered until such time as one or more of these stockholders notifies us that they want to receive separate copies. This procedure reduces duplicate mailings and saves printing costs and postage fees, as well as natural resources. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to have access to and utilize separate proxy voting instructions.

If you receive a single set of proxy materials as a result of householding, and you would like to have separate copies of our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, annual report, or proxy statement mailed to you, please submit a request or notice, as applicable, to our Corporate Secretary at 4055 Technology Forest Blvd., Suite 210, The Woodlands, Texas 77381, or call our Investor Relations department at (936) 230-5899, and we will promptly send you what you have requested. However, please note that if you want to receive a paper proxy or voting instruction form or other proxy materials for purposes of this year’s annual meeting, follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that was sent to you. You can also contact our Investor Relations department at the phone number or address set forth above if you received multiple copies of the annual meeting materials and would prefer to receive a single copy in the future, or if you would like to opt out of householding for future mailings.

Conn’s, Inc.

2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

May 31, 2017

FORM OF PROXY

YOU CAN VOTE OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE

QUICK * EASY * IMMEDIATE * AVAILABLE * 24 HOURS A DAY * 7 DAYS A WEEK

Conn’s, Inc. encourages you to take advantage of convenient ways to vote. If voting by proxy, you may vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote in the same manner as if you marked, signed, and returned your proxy card. To vote over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail, please read the accompanying proxy statement and then follow these easy steps:

VOTE BY INTERNET – www.proxyvote.com

Use the internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 PM Eastern Time on May 30, 2017. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

VOTE BY PHONE – (800) 690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 PM Eastern Time on May 30, 2017. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Conn’s, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in the future.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, or Conn’s Corporate Secretary, 4055 Technology Forest Blvd., Suite 210, The Woodlands, Texas 77381.

Important Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement, and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.conns.com and www.proxyvote.com. By my signature below, I revoke all previous proxies and appoint Mark L. Prior or Lee A. Wright as proxy, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to represent and to vote, as designated below, all shares of Common Stock of Conn’s, Inc. that I held of record as of the close of business on April 5, 2017, at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders to be held at The Westin at The Woodlands, 2 Waterway Square Place, Edgewater Ballroom B, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, on May 31, 2017, at 12:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time, or any postponements or adjournments thereof. The above named proxy is hereby instructed to vote as specified.

THIS PROXY IS BEING SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN THE BOXES BELOW USING DARK INK ONLY

Proposals:


	FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
1. To elect the eight directors listed below:
James H. Haworth	☐	☐	☐
Kelly M. Malson	☐	☐	☐
Bob L. Martin	☐	☐	☐
Douglas H. Martin	☐	☐	☐
Norman L. Miller	☐	☐	☐
William E. Saunders, Jr.	☐	☐	☐
William (David) Schofman	☐	☐	☐


Oded Shein	☐	☐	☐

	FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
2. To ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2018.	☐	☐	☐
3. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, named executive officers’ compensation.	☐	☐	☐
4. To vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for the frequency of advisory votes on named executive officers’ compensation.	☐ Every One Year ☐ Every Two Years ☐ Every Three Years ☐ Abstain
	FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
5. To approve the adoption of the Amended 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.	☐	☐	☐

IMPORTANT – This proxy must be signed and dated where provided on the reverse side.

If you execute and return this proxy it will be voted in the manner you have specified. If no specification is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” each of the director nominees in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposal 2, “FOR” Proposal 3, “FOR” the “Every One Year” option in Proposal 4 and “FOR” Proposal 5 and in the discretion of the above named person acting as proxy on such other matters that may properly come before the meeting.

Please sign exactly as your name appears on this proxy. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as a fiduciary, such as an attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, etc., please give your full title as such. Please return this form of proxy promptly in the enclosed envelope.

The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of 2017 annual meeting of stockholders and the Proxy Statement accompanying such Notice, each dated April 12, 2017.


Print Name				Print Name



Signature(s)				Signature(s)



Date				Date